ImageImage

CJ TRADE IDEAS

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

Matt800
Rookie
Posts: 1,131
And1: 317
Joined: Aug 01, 2014

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#201 » by Matt800 » Thu Aug 5, 2021 7:48 am

monopoman wrote:
Matt800 wrote:
Myth wrote:I’d even add a 1st.

I don't think anything with Siakam is a great idea, and it's even harder to like when adding more outgoing value in Nurkic. The main reason being that Siakam is injured and expected back 1-2 months after the season starts. Lillard wants to have help, and intentionally starting a season down a key guy is basically the opposite.


Siakam would be the type of player to flourish next to Dame though, as far as players available for CJ he is easily at the top of my list.

People keep talking bout Tobias Harris or something and I think that is a lateral move for CJ that doesn't make us better or worse. ****, Siakam might only be gettable right now due to injury concerns, if Siakam was fully healthy he would likely be outside of the CJ+pick price.


He would be a good fit, but I don't think it is realistic from both sides. Why would Toronto want CJ? And why would Portland want a guy who cant play for 1-2 months to start the season? Portland needs a good season and that really wouldn't help. But hey if Toronto wants to do it and Lillard wants to do it then it sounds good. If Lillard thinks Siakam can make them contenders in a year or two he might be up for it.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,861
And1: 10,505
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#202 » by Myth » Thu Aug 5, 2021 12:25 pm

Matt800 wrote:
monopoman wrote:
Matt800 wrote:I don't think anything with Siakam is a great idea, and it's even harder to like when adding more outgoing value in Nurkic. The main reason being that Siakam is injured and expected back 1-2 months after the season starts. Lillard wants to have help, and intentionally starting a season down a key guy is basically the opposite.


Siakam would be the type of player to flourish next to Dame though, as far as players available for CJ he is easily at the top of my list.

People keep talking bout Tobias Harris or something and I think that is a lateral move for CJ that doesn't make us better or worse. ****, Siakam might only be gettable right now due to injury concerns, if Siakam was fully healthy he would likely be outside of the CJ+pick price.


He would be a good fit, but I don't think it is realistic from both sides. Why would Toronto want CJ? And why would Portland want a guy who cant play for 1-2 months to start the season? Portland needs a good season and that really wouldn't help. But hey if Toronto wants to do it and Lillard wants to do it then it sounds good. If Lillard thinks Siakam can make them contenders in a year or two he might be up for it.



Being out 1-2 months wouldn’t stop me from adding a near perfect fit.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,206
And1: 3,144
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#203 » by PDXKnight » Thu Aug 5, 2021 1:13 pm

Myth wrote:
Matt800 wrote:
monopoman wrote:
Siakam would be the type of player to flourish next to Dame though, as far as players available for CJ he is easily at the top of my list.

People keep talking bout Tobias Harris or something and I think that is a lateral move for CJ that doesn't make us better or worse. ****, Siakam might only be gettable right now due to injury concerns, if Siakam was fully healthy he would likely be outside of the CJ+pick price.


He would be a good fit, but I don't think it is realistic from both sides. Why would Toronto want CJ? And why would Portland want a guy who cant play for 1-2 months to start the season? Portland needs a good season and that really wouldn't help. But hey if Toronto wants to do it and Lillard wants to do it then it sounds good. If Lillard thinks Siakam can make them contenders in a year or two he might be up for it.



Being out 1-2 months wouldn’t stop me from adding a near perfect fit.


Exactly and we are on the verge of losing lillard so i think this is the kind of move that we need in order to show dame we are serious about winning.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,426
And1: 9,977
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#204 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Aug 5, 2021 3:18 pm

Oden2 wrote:
Myth wrote:
Matt800 wrote:
He would be a good fit, but I don't think it is realistic from both sides. Why would Toronto want CJ? And why would Portland want a guy who cant play for 1-2 months to start the season? Portland needs a good season and that really wouldn't help. But hey if Toronto wants to do it and Lillard wants to do it then it sounds good. If Lillard thinks Siakam can make them contenders in a year or two he might be up for it.



Being out 1-2 months wouldn’t stop me from adding a near perfect fit.


Exactly and we are on the verge of losing lillard so i think this is the kind of move that we need in order to show dame we are serious about winning.


It seems pretty clear that Toronto is rebuilding. They have not made a single win-now signing, they drafted the more-raw Barnes over Suggs, facilitated a Lowry deal. With all this evidence of a rebuild, or retool at the least, why are they interested in CJ again?

I think a 3-way where Simmons ends up in TOR is the only possibility, but I dont think that works either unless they are confident trotting out 2 forwards that cant shoot in Ben and Barnes. Not to mention PHI still is asking for superstar value for Ben.
sisibilio
Head Coach
Posts: 7,318
And1: 1,435
Joined: Nov 18, 2009

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#205 » by sisibilio » Thu Aug 5, 2021 3:31 pm

Oden2 wrote:
Sinobas wrote:
ProcessDoctor wrote:Sixers fan in peace here. If I’m Morey, I do everything to pry Dame away from you guys. IF that doesn’t work, I’m all for acquiring CJ.

Simmons + Hill for McCollum + Covington + 2023 FRP + 2025 FRP


I'd take Simmons for McCollum. Swap Covington for DJJ and no 2025 FRP.

We could play Simmons at forward.


Personally i think i’d do it with both frp’s. Simmons would be considered a top 5 player if he could shoot but nonetheless his skillset is unique and worth ponying up for imo

If he could shoot a bit we wouldn't be talking about this.
Anyway that's the trade. I'd like to keep RoCo if possible and limit to one 1st or heavily protect the 2025 one (a lot of shiet can happen in 4 years) but it wouldn't be a deal breaker.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN

Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
sisibilio
Head Coach
Posts: 7,318
And1: 1,435
Joined: Nov 18, 2009

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#206 » by sisibilio » Thu Aug 5, 2021 3:33 pm

Siakam is a good player but he doesn't make Blazers real contenders even in the best case scenario IMO.
If you want to try to measure the elements of basketball that are supposedly unmeasurable, spend a game just watching Marc Gasol.
@MikePradaSBN

Wembanyama was created to end all LeBron vs Jordan debates
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,861
And1: 10,505
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#207 » by Myth » Thu Aug 5, 2021 4:40 pm

sisibilio wrote:Siakam is a good player but he doesn't make Blazers real contenders even in the best case scenario IMO.

He cuts the gap from where we are to championship in about half IMO. If we get on the verge, hopefully we could make one more big splashy trade and/or lure some better FA vets to put us over the top.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,853
And1: 1,617
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#208 » by Blazinaway » Thu Aug 5, 2021 5:00 pm

Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1423295930275491846%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fs9e.github.io%2Fiframe%2Ftwitter.min.html1423295930275491846

Looks like Simmons situation gettin worse and worse, keep waitin Morey and watch that value drop!
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,426
And1: 9,977
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#209 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Aug 5, 2021 5:09 pm

I think moving RoCo w/ CJ for Simmons defeats the purpose of making a move to help our chances in the PO's. You cant trot out Tony Snell or DJJ as a starter if you want to go even as far as the WCF.

It has to be CJ + picks for Simmons. We need to keep our other win now pieces.
skoharry
Junior
Posts: 342
And1: 20
Joined: Sep 14, 2006
Location: oregon
 

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#210 » by skoharry » Thu Aug 5, 2021 5:22 pm

I think this trade helps everyone and is fair for all involved
TOR incoming - Warren, Nurkic, & a 2nd
TOR outgoing - OG & Boucher

ORL incoming - M Turner
ORL outgoing - MCW, Bamba, & a 1st

IND incoming - CJ & Bamba
IND outgoing - Turner, Warren, & a 1st

POR incoming - MCW, OG, Boucher, & two 1st.
POR outgoing - CJ, Nurkic, & a 2nd

IDK it's probably a bad trade, but it seems good
Defense and rebounding wins games
User avatar
red_power
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,620
And1: 900
Joined: Feb 21, 2010
 

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#211 » by red_power » Thu Aug 5, 2021 6:23 pm

Blazinaway wrote:Looks like Simmons situation gettin worse and worse, keep waitin Morey and watch that value drop!

Yeah this dude is done at Philly.
He enjoyed a superstar treatment right from the start of his NBA career and now he's publicly been thrown into multiple trade talks..
I think this is exactly the point of no return.
Simmons won't be back at the 76ers on his own will, and he won't be playing at 100% even if he's forced to return there next season.
"Fly forward despite the fog" (c) Kobe Bryant 1978-2020
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,426
And1: 9,977
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#212 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Aug 5, 2021 6:30 pm

Report out today says Simmons doesnt want to go to TOR or PDX, wants to end up in CA.

Kid is a loser. Stops talking to his teammates and demands a trade only to CA after his embarrassing playoff run.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,479
And1: 2,215
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#213 » by Norm2953 » Thu Aug 5, 2021 6:56 pm

I do wonder how he would fit with the GSW for he would play the same role as Draymond Green. Could a 3 way be crafted where Dray ends up in Portland, Simmons in GSW and CJ in Philly?
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,853
And1: 1,617
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#214 » by Blazinaway » Thu Aug 5, 2021 6:57 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:Report out today says Simmons doesnt want to go to TOR or PDX, wants to end up in CA.

Kid is a loser. Stops talking to his teammates and demands a trade only to CA after his embarrassing playoff run.


I believe that came from a local bay area reporter of dubious belief on stuff like this, but Simmons does appears to have his "warts"
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,206
And1: 3,144
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#215 » by PDXKnight » Thu Aug 5, 2021 7:04 pm

Blazinaway wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:Report out today says Simmons doesnt want to go to TOR or PDX, wants to end up in CA.

Kid is a loser. Stops talking to his teammates and demands a trade only to CA after his embarrassing playoff run.


I believe that came from a local bay area reporter of dubious belief on stuff like this, but Simmons does appears to have his "warts"


Who cares what he wants? Yeah we try to keep him happy but honestly i wouldn’t let this stop me from trading for him as he’s locked up for a good amount of time
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,853
And1: 1,617
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#216 » by Blazinaway » Thu Aug 5, 2021 7:13 pm

Read on Twitter
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1423127605667106823%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fs9e.github.io%2Fiframe%2Ftwitter.min.html1423127605667106823

and we have this....
DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,626
And1: 6,624
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#217 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Thu Aug 5, 2021 7:41 pm

Oden2 wrote:
Blazinaway wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:Report out today says Simmons doesnt want to go to TOR or PDX, wants to end up in CA.

Kid is a loser. Stops talking to his teammates and demands a trade only to CA after his embarrassing playoff run.


I believe that came from a local bay area reporter of dubious belief on stuff like this, but Simmons does appears to have his "warts"


Who cares what he wants? Yeah we try to keep him happy but honestly i wouldn’t let this stop me from trading for him as he’s locked up for a good amount of time


Why? He will quit on us too at the drop of a hat. I agree, he doesn't have that tough-it-out mentality that is needed for winning IMO.
User avatar
monopoman
RealGM
Posts: 12,633
And1: 6,455
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
     

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#218 » by monopoman » Thu Aug 5, 2021 8:52 pm

Simmons refusing to play here makes us trading for him almost 0 even in a situation where Lillard demands out and only wants Philly which I think is completely unlikely anyways.

Every Sixer fan on the general board seems to think that Lillard becoming a Sixer is destiny or some ****.
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,214
And1: 4,273
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#219 » by JasonStern » Thu Aug 5, 2021 9:14 pm

Norm2953 wrote:I do wonder how he would fit with the GSW for he would play the same role as Draymond Green. Could a 3 way be crafted where Dray ends up in Portland, Simmons in GSW and CJ in Philly?


With Powell retained, that's a sneaky interesting trade proposal.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
BNM
Analyst
Posts: 3,565
And1: 4,305
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: CJ TRADE IDEAS 

Post#220 » by BNM » Thu Aug 5, 2021 9:28 pm

Matt800 wrote:He would be a good fit, but I don't think it is realistic from both sides. Why would Toronto want CJ? And why would Portland want a guy who cant play for 1-2 months to start the season? Portland needs a good season and that really wouldn't help.


Because Damian Lillard cares much more about the playoffs than the first month, or two, of the regular season. Last year, we saw Dame absolutely carry a team of scrubs on his back for two months while both CJ and Nurk were out. Even with Siakam out, you start the season with a healthy Nurk and Norm. Add RoCo at the 4 and run the 3 by committee with DJJ, Little and Snell until Siakam is healthy. Then start Siakam at the 4 and move RoCo to starting 3.

That would easily be the best pair of starting forwards POR would have had since Aldridge and Batum - and against some match ups, it would be better. Just look at who will be making the playoffs in the West. If you hope to compete. you need big forwards that can defend. Siakam and RoCo would give POR that.

Throughout his career, Dame has shown the ability to carry a weak roster to the playoffs. Even with Siakam missing the first month, or two, this team would be way better than the post Aldridge team and the Hezonja/Tolliver/Bazemore squad. (i.e. way more than good enough to win plenty of regular season games until Siakam is fully health). Plus, sitting out a month or two will mean less wear and tear on Siakam entering the playoffs

And ultimately, it comes down to the playoffs. I don't think winning it all is the only way to placate Dame. I just think he wants to be competitive in the playoffs - at the very least get past the first round and be highly competitive, perhaps even win, the 2nd round. I think losing badly in the 1st round to a very undermanned DEN team was very hard for him to take. He played insanely well in that series (34.3 ppg, 10.2 apg, PER = 30.4, TS% = .660, AST% = 41.3, WS/48 = .286, BPM = +12.2), but didn't have enough talent around him to avoid losing to a injury depleted DEN squad. Anything close to that again, and he's gone (and I wouldn't blame him).

A starting 5 of:

Dame
Norm
RoCo
Siakam
Nurk

Is very balanced and offers a good blend of offense and defense. Plus, POR would no longer be undersized against every other team in the league.

Why would TOR want CJ? I don't think they would. I think there would need to be a third team involved.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers