QingJames wrote:CptCrunch wrote:Barnes plays well, the ROY chants start. He has a few crap games, whisper silent.
What is Barnes' case for ROY? Like a few fractions higher in counting stats at worse efficiency. Let's just ignore defense and the fact that Mobley has a legitimate case for all-NBA defensive team.
His case is essentially that he's a much better offensive player than Mobley, which is true. I don't personally think it outranks Mobley's defense, but that's the case for Barnes.
Barnes joined a team projected to win 37 games and they are under pace. Well under pace when he has played at 7-12.
They are a worse team when he’s on the court. That’s true of most rookies. His defense has become horrible. He was -22 last night, double the next closest guy. I don’t place a lot in +/- in any one game, but he was the worst last game, and they’re certainly sacrificing winning playing him so much as his defense dropped off a cliff.
When OG comes back, they need to make a choice between playing him 16 minutes a game and trying to win or tank by playing him starter minutes. He might be less a liability on defense with less minutes.
Mobley joined a team that was projected to win 25.5 games when it opened, lost their leading scorer, and is 10-6 when he plays. He’s a complete positive on the court. He’s the difference between winning and losing.
He’s the first or second best player on the team .
This isn’t close. It’s a matter of can Mobley stay healthy, and if so, they aren’t in the same conversation for those who value winning.
One is detracting from his team to be on the court. The other team is dependent on a rookie to win.