sfernald wrote:dkb964 wrote:sfernald wrote:
In CA? And reportedly she was 14. Add another user to the rape brigade list!
Another poster just said she is 18. You are trying to stir the pot.
That’s not a good argument for him, so don’t expect it to go that way. As another poster said, his best hope is to pay off the girl and then she denies that they had sex. That is doable. They can’t pretend she’s younger. Her age will be known and is a simple irrefutable fact unless you are an international NBA player apparently

Actually considering this maybe Giddey’s best argument is that he’s only 17. I’m sure Australia would take care of that for him.
Does he NEED a good argument, but? What actually happened? When? And where? You've gone with the worst possible "facts", on every count. Maybe she's 18/was 17 when it happened, maybe she's 15/was 14 when it happened? Maybe it happened in a state where the legal age is 16, maybe it happened in a state where it is 18. A couple of photos and a salacious caption aren't the be all/end all needed for a conviction. Let's not act like this would be the first girl/family who COULD have stitched someone up with fake "facts". Again, my interpretation may be NO MORE probable/plausible than yours, but it's also not neccessarily LESS plausible, either.