Fantasy Trade Thread

[Unbreakable99]

why?

LOL come on man. You want to trade the 3rd pick to move all the way back to number 10, for a swap possibility? That may or may not happen?

You need to be banned from this thread.

For a chance to get a first from a team that will be playing nearly all rookies in sophomores, and are primed for a bottom 3 record? In a class featuring a guy as skilled and potentially transcendent as Luka Doncic? When the alternative is choosing guys like Josh Jackson who don't fit on the roster or Malik Monk/Jonathan Isaac who don't have the pedigree to go #3 in a respectable draft class? What is at all unreasonable about that?

It would be dumb to trade all the way back to 10. If anything I want more top 10 picks in this draft, not fewer.

[JoJoEmbiid]

Trade 3 for 5 and swap rights. Then flip 5, Ok4, and seconds for PG13. We get Paul George for at least(hopefully more) a year and another good pick next year.

[Ericb5]

Would you guys do #7 for the better of your/LALs pick next year?

I would do that if we top 3 protected the pick, but I would assume that that would be a deal breaker.

The Knicks have a good pick this year and will be able to get a good player at 7. Smith would be perfect for you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AllHype3]

Trade 3 to Phoenix for Bledsoe and swap rights to Suns 2018 pick.

Why? Still so many unanswered questions on the roster. Embiid health? Simmons shooting and PG abilities? TLC continue improvements? Korkmaz on roster ? So many more.

Sixers dont have stability at off guard or secondary ball handler. Bledsoe, a near all star level player, would bring vet leadership on a cheap contract.

Possibly 2 very high picks next year with Lakers and Suns pick.

Continuing the search for the next superstar!!!!

[OFWGKTA]

Would you guys do #7 for the better of your/LALs pick next year?

I would do that if we top 3 protected the pick, but I would assume that that would be a deal breaker.

The Knicks have a good pick this year and will be able to get a good player at 7. Smith would be perfect for you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm actually a Celtics fan trying work out the logistics of a deal with Minnesota (they have #7, NYK has #8). Basically Crowder/Bradley/Celtics 2018 pick for Dieng/#7. Celtics are signing Gordon Hayward in this scenario, and the salary of #7 wouldn't allow us to offer the full max. So I figured I'd try to flip the pick for a similarly valuable 2018 pick. I'm not against top 3 protection, I just wouldn't want to end up with your non lotto pick if you guys end up making the playoffs, which I see happening if Embiid can get through the whole season.

[Foshan]

Would you guys do #7 for the better of your/LALs pick next year?

I would do that if we top 3 protected the pick, but I would assume that that would be a deal breaker.

The Knicks have a good pick this year and will be able to get a good player at 7. Smith would be perfect for you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm actually a Celtics fan trying work out the logistics of a deal with Minnesota (they have #7, NYK has #8). Basically Crowder/Bradley/Celtics 2018 pick for Dieng/#7. Celtics are signing Gordon Hayward in this scenario, and the salary of #7 wouldn't allow us to offer the full max. So I figured I'd try to flip the pick for a similarly valuable 2018 pick. I'm not against top 3 protection, I just wouldn't want to end up with your non lotto pick if you guys end up making the playoffs, which I see happening if Embiid can get through the whole season.

With top 3 protection I would be all over this type of deal.

we take jackson or Issac at 3, and get a guard at 7 (one of them would have to still be there). A healthy Embiid could probably drag them into the playoffs which would be great experience for such a young group. i think it would be a tough sell to boston. delayed gratification doesn't go over well, especially on fan forums

[the_process]

Okafor to POR
3 and 20 to SAC
Leonard, 5, and 10 to PHI

[the_process]

Holmes, 2019 SAC 1st, and 3 to BOS for 1

[smittybanton]

Would you guys do #7 for the better of your/LALs pick next year?

My initial thought is no, although its a fair deal. I like having a probably lottery pick in next year's draft.

Then, we have our own pick, four second round picks, and $50M in capspace, along with Ben Simmons and possibly Furkan Korkmaz. We don't really need to spend a future asset for another rookie. Yes, I would trade the #3 for #5 and #10. But that's only because I believe it is the smart thing to do, value-wise, despite the trouble of having so much youth.

Now if we had no pick, I would be more likely to do it.

Matter of fact, if we take Josh Jackson with #3 and Dennis Smith Jr is sitting there at #7, call me!!!

[Chris76]

Trade 3 to Phoenix for Bledsoe and swap rights to Suns 2018 pick.

Why? Still so many unanswered questions on the roster. Embiid health? Simmons shooting and PG abilities? TLC continue improvements? Korkmaz on roster ? So many more.

Sixers dont have stability at off guard or secondary ball handler. Bledsoe, a near all star level player, would bring vet leadership on a cheap contract.

Possibly 2 very high picks next year with Lakers and Suns pick.

Continuing the search for the next superstar!!!!

Didn't Bledsoe insult the Sixers? "A college team, Kentucky would beat the sixers". Funny, if he has to play for such a bad team.

[BigSleep333]

Trade 3 to Phoenix for Bledsoe and swap rights to Suns 2018 pick.

Why? Still so many unanswered questions on the roster. Embiid health? Simmons shooting and PG abilities? TLC continue improvements? Korkmaz on roster ? So many more.

Sixers dont have stability at off guard or secondary ball handler. Bledsoe, a near all star level player, would bring vet leadership on a cheap contract.

Possibly 2 very high picks next year with Lakers and Suns pick.

Continuing the search for the next superstar!!!!

Didn't Bledsoe insult the Sixers? "A college team, Kentucky would beat the sixers". Funny, if he has to play for such a bad team.

to be fair...we lost 72 games by that time, right?`that team was a dleague group..

[Chris76]

Trade 3 to Phoenix for Bledsoe and swap rights to Suns 2018 pick.

Why? Still so many unanswered questions on the roster. Embiid health? Simmons shooting and PG abilities? TLC continue improvements? Korkmaz on roster ? So many more.

Sixers dont have stability at off guard or secondary ball handler. Bledsoe, a near all star level player, would bring vet leadership on a cheap contract.

Possibly 2 very high picks next year with Lakers and Suns pick.

Continuing the search for the next superstar!!!!

Didn't Bledsoe insult the Sixers? "A college team, Kentucky would beat the sixers". Funny, if he has to play for such a bad team.

to be fair...we lost 72 games by that time, right?`that team was a dleague group..

Your right. However, i think we could of beat Kentucky best of 3.

[Negrodamus]

Didn't Bledsoe insult the Sixers? "A college team, Kentucky would beat the sixers". Funny, if he has to play for such a bad team.

to be fair...we lost 72 games by that time, right?`that team was a dleague group..

Your right. However, i think we could of beat Kentucky best of 3.

The Sixers would have annihilated the Wildcats.

[Ericb5]

Would you guys do #7 for the better of your/LALs pick next year?

I would do that if we top 3 protected the pick, but I would assume that that would be a deal breaker.

The Knicks have a good pick this year and will be able to get a good player at 7. Smith would be perfect for you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm actually a Celtics fan trying work out the logistics of a deal with Minnesota (they have #7, NYK has #8). Basically Crowder/Bradley/Celtics 2018 pick for Dieng/#7. Celtics are signing Gordon Hayward in this scenario, and the salary of #7 wouldn't allow us to offer the full max. So I figured I'd try to flip the pick for a similarly valuable 2018 pick. I'm not against top 3 protection, I just wouldn't want to end up with your non lotto pick if you guys end up making the playoffs, which I see happening if Embiid can get through the whole season.

That makes sense. I would think that we would be all over that. At 7 we could possibly get Smith or Monk, and next year we still would have the home run shot available.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[PhillySixers22]

With all the recent talk about the Lakers being torn between Ball and Jackson, I would look into a deal built around #3 for Russell. The value is pretty even imo and what Russell brings would fit great with Embiid and Simmons without a trade off in potential. I would wait until draft night to make the move in case LA or Boston actually drafts Jackson, in which case I would go with Ball or Fultz. In the end I'll be satisfied if we walk away from draft night with Jackson, but the more I think about it the more I'm inclined to go D'Lo over Jackson.

[the_process]

Holmes, 2019 SAC 1st, and 3 to BOS for 1

Wonder how close this will be to correct if the deal Woj just reported gets done?

[Chris76]

Holmes, 2019 SAC 1st, and 3 to BOS for 1

Wonder how close this will be to correct if the deal Woj just reported gets done?

That's a good deal for Boston, if they really like Jackson/Isaac at 3. Unfortunately, I think it's going to be more to move up. I read it's just picks and not players.
2018 Lakers 1st, 2019 Sac 1st, and 3 to Boston for 1

[the_process]

Holmes, 2019 SAC 1st, and 3 to BOS for 1

Wonder how close this will be to correct if the deal Woj just reported gets done?

That's a good deal for Boston, if they really like Jackson/Isaac at 3. Unfortunately, I think it's going to be more to move up. I read it's just picks and not players.
2018 Lakers 1st, 2019 Sac 1st, and 3 to Boston for 1

If that's where Ainge draws his line, BC better tell him to pound sand.

[timLH]

IMO, staying at #3 is the best option. If BC wants to pull the trigger this year, what can we get with #36, #39, our own 2018, 2018 LAL and 2019 SAC pick?

[Chris76]

IMO, staying at #3 is the best option. If BC wants to pull the trigger this year, what can we get with #36, #39, our own 2018, 2018 LAL and 2019 SAC pick?

An opportunity to get a player that is BPA and a great fit with Simmons and Embiid should be done. Boston has the leverage on the sixers, but Fultz and IT would be a less fit than IT and Jimmy Butler. Both teams can improve their team chemistry with this deal. An overpay for the Sixers is justified, but Boston shouldn't risk the chance to get another star being too greedy.