Optms wrote:And Russell wins us what exactly?
D'Angelo, even if all went well with his development, would be relegated to carrying Old-man-Lebron's bags around. A declining Lebron is still better than 96% of every player who have played in the history of the game. As it turns out, Russell's maturity, or lack there of, will likely prevent him from even reaching his full potential. As so he shouldn't even be allowed within 20 yards of a declining Lebron.
And you're concerned we let go of what exactly? A young kid, while admittedly talented, is as athletic as battery operated barbie Ken doll with a Nick Young personality?
No thanks.
Yet again, what's your point? I want us fielding a good team and competing for championships. This trade made our team worse. At least you know better than to argue about that.
I don't care how good a declining Lebron is. Is he winning a championship here? The answer, obviously, is no. We just gave up one of the pieces we had that could've made a nice third player to put with a Lebron and Paul George for nothing.
Are you implying that D'lo would've been a bad influence on grown ass Lebron James?

That's maybe the most ridiculous thing I've literally ever heard on the internet.
I'm concerned we're getting rid of the 2015 #2 pick for scraps.
You guys can whine about Russell and hate all you want, but what we're getting in return is far worse no matter how much you want to delude yourself and you all know it.