DroseReturnChi wrote:WindyCityBorn wrote:chrispatrick wrote:
LaVine's teammates sucking next season shouldn't prevent us from finding out whether the sucky team plays better with or without him.
And under the logic you stated that the money we spend the next 4 years doesn't matter, then we should be exclusively using our cap space for team to bury bad contracts at the cost of a draft pick. There is an opportunity cost to paying LaVine a mega contract more than he is worth.
I'd appreciate the vision if they planned to turn that cap space into draft picks (or valued a first round pick more than LaVine).
Not sure why you are in such a rush to get rid of a 21 year old SG with great offensive skills. He is young enough to fit in with the rebuild. Trying to flip him for a draft pick makes no sense a this point. Seems like you are trying to apply the same logic to Lavine as what used with Butler. If Butler was 21 he would still be here.
The Zach Levine made up problem.
He's just butthurt the team lost Butler.
It would be incredibly stupid to let go of Lavine who has already better offensive skills than Butler. 10x Way more stupid than giving up the 16th pick and the 38th pick or the 2nd round pick for Payne.
Every team needs to spend at least 90% of the entire cap space and would be penalized if they didnt. Even if Lavine doesnt pan out which I highly doubt, we can always trade him for a 1st round pick. 20 mil for a number 2 option is incredibly cheap for future seasons compared to Butler's 50 million and I doubt Butler is 2x better than Lavine.
You can call it butthurt, it's a logical argument that you don't like.
1.) You can say LaVine has better offensive skills than Butler, but that sure doesn't show up in on court team impact and sure doesn't show up in a efficiency advantage. LaVine is a much better shooter and more athletic than Butler, but he has far less in the way of skills.
2.) Your argument says "20 mil for a number 2 option". LaVine is too young to say he'll never be that, but #2 option on a good team is not at all his most likely path.
3.) If Butler got paid $50 million, it would only be because he kept improving up until his next contract. In fact, Butler's next contract will be less than $50 million, and if LaVine shows that he's healthy, his will likely be more than $20 million, so your numbers aren't really fair.
4.) Whether Butler is 2X better than LaVine years down the road is anyone's guess. Right now, he's infinitely better as you're comparing a guy with a +10.6 on/off impact to a guy sporting a -3.8 on/off impact. We obviously didn't make this trade for right now, but you clearly have more confidence than I do that LaVine will become a positive player and that Butler will drop to a non-impact player like he is now.
I guess if we can agree on one thing, it's hating Cameron Payne.