ImageImageImageImageImage

Battle for L.A. 2019-20

Moderators: og15, TrueLAfan

User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,161
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#221 » by esqtvd » Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:01 pm

clipperlover wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
clipperlover wrote:
That trade was the worst trade in the Doc era and spawned many bad future moves. We were coming off a post season where we definitely needed to have a backup and potential long term replacement behind DeAndre. Doc drafts Bullock over Gobert, so we enter free agency with a need at backup big, Rather than get the Suns to include Gortat in the trade, Doc listens to Gentry and gets Stay-Puft. Not only did Doc move Bledsoe without ever having him pay a game for Doc, he picked up Stay-Puft when we could have just moved Caron Butler to the Bucks ourselves for Redick (who was a career backup that Doc felt needed to be a starter). After the trade, the Suns moved Butler to the Bucks and ended up moving Gortat to the Wizards where he had several good years. The solution to our back-up big issue was Byron Mullens who never played another game in the NBA after us. From there, it was just a bunch of other bad moves to try to recover.

Had we drafted Gobert, received Gortat in the trade instead of Stay-Puft or just let Bledsoe play out the year and become a restricted FA or trade him mid-year, we stood a much better chance of making the NBA Finals.



Shoulda-wouldas are not very helpful. The Jazz got the Gobert pick in trade for garbage---a second-rounder and cash. In essence, the WHOLE LEAGUE passed on Gobert. He was a foreign longshot that came in. In that same draft, the same Jazz geniuses took Trey Burke at #9, and he was a bust. So it goes.

And I hate Dudley as much as the next guy and was a hater from the very first preseason game. Yes, his acquisition did start a snowball of unfortunate trades and deals, but he WAS hurt for the Clippers, and bravely played hurt while Barnes was out. When he got healthy the next year and the year after, he was pretty much the player Doc thought he was getting.

That said, I still hate him. I do think it was his mouth, not his play, that made it necessary to dump him. We had no Lee Jenkins at the time to warn us off him in the first place, LOL. The dude never shuts up.


Sorry, but we had a need for a back-up big man that could help us. We didn't do it in the 2013 draft. In the 2014 draft, we were already coming off the Mullens debacle and DeAndre was becoming a free agent the following summer, so we needed a big. We also had just lived through the horrible Stay_Puft debacle. So, logically we go out and draft C.J. Wilcox over the bigger Kyle Anderson which was questionable when it happened and it didn't solve our backup big issue. The next true big man available in that draft was Jokic. Jokic didn't come over that first year, but when he did come over he ended up starting nearly as many games his 1st season as Wilcox played in his entire 3 yr career.

This isn't a shoulda, woulda, coulda. The decisions made were poor and that poor decision making ultimately led to us not having the overall roster talent to make the NBA Finals and Doc losing that decision making role.

We experienced several years of bad decision making and never seeing the obvious holes in the roster (i.e. back up big, defense) addressed.


NOBODY knew whether Gobert could play. He was drafted on his physical measurements alone. Total pig in a poke, which is why the whole league passed on him. And people forget that Sterling's Clippers had the smallest and cheapest scouting staff in the league. There is no way they could have been up on some longshot in France. If Doc only acquired players he was familiar with--and he did--that's why. In fact, Doc was still PoBO when the entire scouting staff was fired and replaced under Ballmer in 2016.

As for missing out on the great Kyle Anderson, oh well, LOL. The whole league passed on him, too. And Doc had only been made PoBO on June 16. The draft was held June 26. You can hardly pin that one on Doc.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
Forte IV
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,379
And1: 6,500
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
   

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#222 » by Forte IV » Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:27 pm

I remember wanting Rudy Gobert really badly in that draft. But then we went with Bullock.
If the Clippers win the championship next year I'm getting banned from RealGM
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,161
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#223 » by esqtvd » Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:38 pm

Forte IV wrote:I remember wanting Rudy Gobert really badly in that draft. But then we went with Bullock.


Yeah, his agent set up draftrudygobert.com or something with these great graphics about his height and wingspan along with some grainy game footage of him destroying 6-foot Eurotrash. I was all over it too. ;-)
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
clipperlover
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,329
And1: 1,155
Joined: Sep 10, 2019

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#224 » by clipperlover » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:53 pm

esqtvd wrote:
clipperlover wrote:
esqtvd wrote:

Shoulda-wouldas are not very helpful. The Jazz got the Gobert pick in trade for garbage---a second-rounder and cash. In essence, the WHOLE LEAGUE passed on Gobert. He was a foreign longshot that came in. In that same draft, the same Jazz geniuses took Trey Burke at #9, and he was a bust. So it goes.

And I hate Dudley as much as the next guy and was a hater from the very first preseason game. Yes, his acquisition did start a snowball of unfortunate trades and deals, but he WAS hurt for the Clippers, and bravely played hurt while Barnes was out. When he got healthy the next year and the year after, he was pretty much the player Doc thought he was getting.

That said, I still hate him. I do think it was his mouth, not his play, that made it necessary to dump him. We had no Lee Jenkins at the time to warn us off him in the first place, LOL. The dude never shuts up.


Sorry, but we had a need for a back-up big man that could help us. We didn't do it in the 2013 draft. In the 2014 draft, we were already coming off the Mullens debacle and DeAndre was becoming a free agent the following summer, so we needed a big. We also had just lived through the horrible Stay_Puft debacle. So, logically we go out and draft C.J. Wilcox over the bigger Kyle Anderson which was questionable when it happened and it didn't solve our backup big issue. The next true big man available in that draft was Jokic. Jokic didn't come over that first year, but when he did come over he ended up starting nearly as many games his 1st season as Wilcox played in his entire 3 yr career.

This isn't a shoulda, woulda, coulda. The decisions made were poor and that poor decision making ultimately led to us not having the overall roster talent to make the NBA Finals and Doc losing that decision making role.

We experienced several years of bad decision making and never seeing the obvious holes in the roster (i.e. back up big, defense) addressed.


NOBODY knew whether Gobert could play. He was drafted on his physical measurements alone. Total pig in a poke, which is why the whole league passed on him. And people forget that Sterling's Clippers had the smallest and cheapest scouting staff in the league. There is no way they could have been up on some longshot in France. If Doc only acquired players he was familiar with--and he did--that's why. In fact, Doc was still PoBO when the entire scouting staff was fired and replaced under Ballmer in 2016.

As for missing out on the great Kyle Anderson, oh well, LOL. The whole league passed on him, too. And Doc had only been made PoBO on June 16. The draft was held June 26. You can hardly pin that one on Doc.



Come on now. Doc had been with the team as Senior VP of Basketball Operations for over a year and was promoted to President just before the draft. It wasn't like he was just hired by the team. As far as Anderson goes, why would it matter that the entire NBA passed over him? He was one of the options we could have chosen at the time. Anderson played more minutes in his rookie season on the defending NBA Champs than Wilcox played in his entire NBA career. I don't recall SG being as big a need at the time as a backup big, backup PG or getting better depth at SF. Redick and Crawford were going to lock down the SG minutes. We just came off a post season where Doc had lineups that consisted of Collison, Redick and Crawford on the floor together. He put Crawford at SF quite bit which made us undersized on the perimeter and horrendous defensively.
User avatar
Yogatti
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,428
And1: 2,195
Joined: Oct 29, 2018
 

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#225 » by Yogatti » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:42 pm

If we struggle to win games in November without Paul George, Doc Rivers should be on the hot seat.

I'm surprised Ballmer hasn't got rid of him after Doc handed out $30 million to his son
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,161
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#226 » by esqtvd » Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:54 pm

clipperlover wrote:
esqtvd wrote:
clipperlover wrote:
Sorry, but we had a need for a back-up big man that could help us. We didn't do it in the 2013 draft. In the 2014 draft, we were already coming off the Mullens debacle and DeAndre was becoming a free agent the following summer, so we needed a big. We also had just lived through the horrible Stay_Puft debacle. So, logically we go out and draft C.J. Wilcox over the bigger Kyle Anderson which was questionable when it happened and it didn't solve our backup big issue. The next true big man available in that draft was Jokic. Jokic didn't come over that first year, but when he did come over he ended up starting nearly as many games his 1st season as Wilcox played in his entire 3 yr career.

This isn't a shoulda, woulda, coulda. The decisions made were poor and that poor decision making ultimately led to us not having the overall roster talent to make the NBA Finals and Doc losing that decision making role.

We experienced several years of bad decision making and never seeing the obvious holes in the roster (i.e. back up big, defense) addressed.


NOBODY knew whether Gobert could play. He was drafted on his physical measurements alone. Total pig in a poke, which is why the whole league passed on him. And people forget that Sterling's Clippers had the smallest and cheapest scouting staff in the league. There is no way they could have been up on some longshot in France. If Doc only acquired players he was familiar with--and he did--that's why. In fact, Doc was still PoBO when the entire scouting staff was fired and replaced under Ballmer in 2016.

As for missing out on the great Kyle Anderson, oh well, LOL. The whole league passed on him, too. And Doc had only been made PoBO on June 16. The draft was held June 26. You can hardly pin that one on Doc.



Come on now. Doc had been with the team as Senior VP of Basketball Operations for over a year and was promoted to President just before the draft. It wasn't like he was just hired by the team. As far as Anderson goes, why would it matter that the entire NBA passed over him? He was one of the options we could have chosen at the time. Anderson played more minutes in his rookie season on the defending NBA Champs than Wilcox played in his entire NBA career. I don't recall SG being as big a need at the time as a backup big, backup PG or getting better depth at SF. Redick and Crawford were going to lock down the SG minutes. We just came off a post season where Doc had lineups that consisted of Collison, Redick and Crawford on the floor together. He put Crawford at SF quite bit which made us undersized on the perimeter and horrendous defensively.



Dude. Kyle Anderson. We're talking about Kyle Freaking Anderson here. :) Spent that year in G-League except 30 games with the Spurs where he averaged 2 points a game. Yes, Doc should have drafted him over Wilcox. But even if he had, it still wouldn't have moved the meter. Nothing worth keening about here.

Doc's value as GM in getting vets to choose us over other suitors and come play for minimum wage was underrated. That year he got Turko and Big Baby to join us, and they were far more productive than Kyle Anderson.

Hey, I'm glad Doc's not GM anymore. No coach has time to watch tape of 100s of 19-year-olds. But considering he had the worst scouting staff in the league under skinflint Sterling, his success at dumpster diving for vets was one reason we even managed to do as well as we did.
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,161
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#227 » by esqtvd » Fri Oct 18, 2019 7:52 pm

Hm.

Read on Twitter
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,161
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#228 » by esqtvd » Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:28 pm

just sayin'


Read on Twitter
Image Are We Having Fun Yet?
ejftw
RealGM
Posts: 11,609
And1: 5,664
Joined: Nov 30, 2008
Contact:
         

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#229 » by ejftw » Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:28 am

Feels like moments away!!
NippySudz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,922
And1: 1,460
Joined: Jul 08, 2019

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#230 » by NippySudz » Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:04 pm

I think the keys to the game will be to run the floor..Lakers are an older team so the clippers should play with faster pace.

The clips are likely.gping to be outrebounded but the Lakers so far have shown to give up threes. So we will see.
NippySudz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,922
And1: 1,460
Joined: Jul 08, 2019

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#231 » by NippySudz » Sat Oct 19, 2019 12:09 pm

Yogatti wrote:If we struggle to win games in November without Paul George, Doc Rivers should be on the hot seat.

I'm surprised Ballmer hasn't got rid of him after Doc handed out $30 million to his son


Are you serious?

Who's a better coach than doc that's on the market? You want tyron lue to be promoted to head coach? What are you saying right now?

QRich3 wrote:Man I remember I was the last one here trying to defend Jared Dudley after he had been doo doo all season long, and I was trying to be patient with him. Everything after that made me dislike the guy as few guys in the league, every time he opens his mouth he says something that irks me. Even when he was a bench scrub for middle of the road East teams, which should be something I shouldn't be caring about, he still found ways to be unlikable. Ugh



Even to this day, he still badmouths doc. Says doc forced him to play injured in one interview over the summer and in road trippin' he said that doc is a great coach but felt doc wasn't honest about his role and minutes and stuff like that.

Doc does seem like a politician at times and I can see how it can rub people the wrong way, but I do find it weird that jared dudley would always take potshots at doc when his name is brought up lol.
clipperlover
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,329
And1: 1,155
Joined: Sep 10, 2019

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#232 » by clipperlover » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:32 pm

I wasn't worried about the Lakers before, but after the #MingJames #QingJames comments of the week, there is going to be a constant cloud over the Lakers. Some of those teammates that don't have shoe endorsement deals probably find his comments hypocritical because his comments are now casting a cloud over the team.

TheNewEra
RealGM
Posts: 28,952
And1: 10,687
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Location: Lob City
       

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#233 » by TheNewEra » Sun Oct 20, 2019 3:58 pm

NippySudz wrote:
Yogatti wrote:If we struggle to win games in November without Paul George, Doc Rivers should be on the hot seat.

I'm surprised Ballmer hasn't got rid of him after Doc handed out $30 million to his son


Are you serious?

Who's a better coach than doc that's on the market? You want tyron lue to be promoted to head coach? What are you saying right now?

QRich3 wrote:Man I remember I was the last one here trying to defend Jared Dudley after he had been doo doo all season long, and I was trying to be patient with him. Everything after that made me dislike the guy as few guys in the league, every time he opens his mouth he says something that irks me. Even when he was a bench scrub for middle of the road East teams, which should be something I shouldn't be caring about, he still found ways to be unlikable. Ugh



Even to this day, he still badmouths doc. Says doc forced him to play injured in one interview over the summer and in road trippin' he said that doc is a great coach but felt doc wasn't honest about his role and minutes and stuff like that.

Doc does seem like a politician at times and I can see how it can rub people the wrong way, but I do find it weird that jared dudley would always take potshots at doc when his name is brought up lol.



One of the biggest issues of being GM and coach. Dudley wasn’t the only one because a GM can make promises that a coach doesn’t exactly have to fully follow
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#234 » by 50CalClips » Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:17 pm

LeLakers are the biggest threat. I previously thought it would be the Utah Jazz, but it's looking like L.A.'s other team will be the Clippers toughest matchup.
Young Sterling
Sophomore
Posts: 222
And1: 137
Joined: Jul 11, 2018
 

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#235 » by Young Sterling » Sun Oct 20, 2019 8:05 pm

50CalClips wrote:LeLakers are the biggest threat. I previously thought it would be the Utah Jazz, but it's looking like L.A.'s other team will be the Clippers toughest matchup.


I don't know, give it like 30 games into the season they may not even be a lock for playoffs. I honestly think they're great too, but if either AD or LeQing goes down, they're not going to win the game. They don't have our depth, and AD is injury prone for the same reason CP3 is. He's so good and tries to do every little thing, but it opens up the opportunities for getting banged up.

Without one, they're done. Fun guy and fun times ahead for us.
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#236 » by 50CalClips » Sun Oct 20, 2019 8:27 pm

Young Sterling wrote:
50CalClips wrote:LeLakers are the biggest threat. I previously thought it would be the Utah Jazz, but it's looking like L.A.'s other team will be the Clippers toughest matchup.


I don't know, give it like 30 games into the season they may not even be a lock for playoffs. I honestly think they're great too, but if either AD or LeQing goes down, they're not going to win the game. They don't have our depth, and AD is injury prone for the same reason CP3 is. He's so good and tries to do every little thing, but it opens up the opportunities for getting banged up.

Without one, they're done. Fun guy and fun times ahead for us.


We can talk depth but we can't count on injuries, ya know what I mean? Without Kawhi, the Clippers are done (the context being Championship or bust). If the Jazz lose Rudy Gobert, they wouldn't be much of a threat, etc.

In terms of matchups, the Lakers worry me.
nickhx2
RealGM
Posts: 10,576
And1: 6,476
Joined: Feb 13, 2014

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#237 » by nickhx2 » Sun Oct 20, 2019 8:43 pm

imo it's fine not to worry about a toxic org headlined by a toxic player
NippySudz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,922
And1: 1,460
Joined: Jul 08, 2019

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#238 » by NippySudz » Sun Oct 20, 2019 8:46 pm

50CalClips wrote:LeLakers are the biggest threat. I previously thought it would be the Utah Jazz, but it's looking like L.A.'s other team will be the Clippers toughest matchup.
The season hasn't even started yet.

Sent from my LM-Q710(FGN) using Tapatalk
User avatar
50CalClips
Rookie
Posts: 1,066
And1: 324
Joined: Jul 25, 2019
   

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#239 » by 50CalClips » Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:12 pm

Harkless, JaMychal, Patterson... what do we expect, how will they deal with Anthony Davis?

How much, if at all, will Kawhi match up against AD?
User avatar
esqtvd
RealGM
Posts: 12,161
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 24, 2017
Location: LA LA LA LAND
Contact:
     

Re: Battle for L.A. 2019-20 

Post#240 » by esqtvd » Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:22 pm

50CalClips wrote:Harkless, JaMychal, Patterson... what do we expect, how will they deal with Anthony Davis?

How much, if at all, will Kawhi match up against AD?



I would think Kawhi gets Bron.



Anthony Davis vs Paul George Full Duel Highlights NBA PS 2015.10.03 - 18 Pts each

Image Are We Having Fun Yet?

Return to Los Angeles Clippers