I didn't mean to say 17-0 happens all the time, but big early runs similar to that magnitude do. Especially when good teams play bad teams.coldfish wrote:Stratmaster wrote:Their shooting was stone cold. They had several wide open shots. The Celtics opened up scorching hot from 3.coldfish wrote:There is too much emphasis on the bullpucky and politics.
The Bulls absolutely laid an egg on the second night of a back to back, again. There is something seriously wrong with the players. Either they suck, they mentally think its OK to take games off or they are fantastically out of condition.
All of the crap that happened after being down 17-0 doesn't happen if the players simply show up for the game.
This isn't an excuse for Boylen or anyone else but the emphasis is a little too strong on the coaching. At least, on the current coach.
This happens all the time in the NBA. Missing shots in the first 6 minutes of a game is not being out of shape and they certainly weren't "not trying" to make them.
Im not saying Boylen didn't need to take action. But he took stupid action.
How can an NBA coach not be able to devise a single play over a 7 minute time frame to get an easy bucket? He had no clue what to do so instead he embarrassed the players for not making their jump shots.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app
I'm with you on multiple levels on the coaching. You need to call timeouts, run set plays, change up the defense to modify the pace of the game, etc. As a coach, there are countless things you do before you go to a 5 man sub.
I disagree on the 17-0 thing. 17-0 is an extremely rare score in the NBA.
I guess my point is that it doesn't have to be the coach's fault OR the player's fault. It can be both. IMO, it is and too much of the negativity is aimed at the coach.
I agree it is on the players when you get blown out early. However, everything that happened after that was all Boylen lunacy.
I was at the game. To everyone around me it was just really bad shooting by the Bulls and can't miss shooting by the Celtics. Boylen had no clue what to do so he pulled everyone.
That would have been fine had he held a meeting on the bench with them (he did but it was brief) and then brought them back in at the next stoppage. That makes some sense. Let them sit a minute, get their **** back together, and then go back at it. He simply left them out. Still, it sounds like the players weren't even upset about the first benching.
The second one was flat out lunacy. The trashing of the team after every loss and the smug approach after the one win probably aren't wearing well.
All of that to say I didn't take it that the bulls lacked effort at the beginning of the game. They were simply outmatched and stone cold shooting wise.
Sent from my SM-G965U using RealGM mobile app