Iverson vs Nash

Moderators: Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier

Higher on your all time list?

Allen Iverson
22
16%
Steve Nash
118
84%
 
Total votes: 140

elchengue20
Starter
Posts: 2,232
And1: 1,914
Joined: Aug 17, 2013

Re: Iverson vs Nash 

Post#281 » by elchengue20 » Fri Sep 25, 2020 11:12 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
elchengue20 wrote: but AI is getting ridicolous disrespect here.

The man was 6'0 at best and scored multiple layups and floaters on Shaq, for example. There is a reason he had an stretch where he was the NBA top scorer in like 3 of 4 seasons. Put that player in this era where everything is step up for his type of game and it would be insane.


This snippet really gets to the heart of this issue.

First the notion of "disrespect", which not compatible with adult conversation.

Then the attempt to use his too-small height like he should get a bonus for it.

Then the anecdotal points on Shaq, without any notion of efficiency.

Then the blanket assertion that AI was the best scorer in the league for years when he really was never close because, once again, efficiency matters and AI was largely yielding major negative TS Add's in an era where the standard was very low compared to today.

Sorry man, if you want to have conversations about who was actually the better, more effective basketball player, there's things you have to stop focusing on and there's other stuff you need to learn to incorporate into your analysis.

On the other hand, if you just want to rave about a dude with incredible moxie, you go right ahead. There's a lot to love about AI, but unfortunately closer analysis shows the warts in his approach that coaches and GMs have to take very seriously. Having the coolest dude in the NBA on your team is a nice thing, but it's not the priority.


Yeah, you right. Jamaal Murray is a better scorer than prime Allen Iverson. If saying that isn't disrespecting an all time great like Iverson, i don't know what it is. That is the level some RealGm posters get to, just by looking at some stats.

The 6'0 reference i said was to argue he was an better "shot maker" than Murray. Iverson scored ridicolous tough shots in tight spaces with players consistenly packing the paint, against much bigger players than him. If you have him today playing in 5 out basketball against smallball teams, he would absolutely crush them.

Also, playstyle today is designed to create offensive efficency. If you gave him that much space, push the tempo up, told him to shoot more 3's than long 2's, gave him better catch and shoot teamates, all his offensive numbers and efficiencty would go up considerably. You can't just look at numbers without context. But hey, if it makes you feel smarter, go ahead.
User avatar
Ryoga Hibiki
RealGM
Posts: 12,660
And1: 7,811
Joined: Nov 14, 2001
Location: Warszawa now, but from Northern Italy

Re: Iverson vs Nash 

Post#282 » by Ryoga Hibiki » Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:22 am

elchengue20 wrote:You are really arguing that Jamaal Murray is a better shot maker than Allen Iverson? Come on now. I know he was inefficient and sometimes played selfish/hero basketball, but AI is getting ridicolous disrespect here.

The man was 6'0 at best and scored multiple layups and floaters on Shaq, for example. There is a reason he had an stretch where he was the NBA top scorer in like 3 of 4 seasons. Put that player in this era where everything is step up for his type of game and it would be insane.

It is hard to properly evaluate what Murray is, as he never played at this level in his NBA career. So I am answering assuming the improvements we saw are there to stay and he won't regress to his old level.
Anyway, the point is that you must look at what was Iverson's game and how it would translate. As I mentioned, Iverson was more in Westbrook mold, he's going to attack the rim, keep pressure, and as a defense you would be happy to see him settle for a contested jumper, something he was never hitting with consistency.
He never showed the ability to stop on a dime a make those crazy jumpers guys like Murray, Lillard or Curry can hit.



Sent from my Nokia 3210 using RealGM mobile app
Слава Украине!
User avatar
Jaivl
Head Coach
Posts: 7,153
And1: 6,797
Joined: Jan 28, 2014
Location: A Coruña, Spain
Contact:
   

Re: Iverson vs Nash 

Post#283 » by Jaivl » Sat Sep 26, 2020 11:41 am

elchengue20 wrote:Yeah, you right. Jamaal Murray is a better scorer than prime Allen Iverson. If saying that isn't disrespecting an all time great like Iverson, i don't know what it is. That is the level some RealGm posters get to, just by looking at some stats.

If Bubble Murray is the real thing, yes he is.
If Bubble Murray is not the real thing, no he is not.

elchengue20 wrote:The 6'0 reference i said was to argue he was an better "shot maker" than Murray. Iverson scored ridicolous tough shots in tight spaces with players consistenly packing the paint, against much bigger players than him. If you have him today playing in 5 out basketball against smallball teams, he would absolutely crush them.

Most of that is self-imposed difficulty by virtue of being small and taking questionable shots, not really by facing tougher defenses, hence it doesn't really "give points" on comparing who's better.

elchengue20 wrote:Also, playstyle today is designed to create offensive efficency. If you gave him that much space, push the tempo up, told him to shoot more 3's than long 2's, gave him better catch and shoot teamates, all his offensive numbers and efficiencty would go up considerably. You can't just look at numbers without context. But hey, if it makes you feel smarter, go ahead.

Yes, if Iverson didn't play like Iverson he'd be a better player. But hell, under those kinds of hypotheticals KG might actually be the GOAT, he'd be basically Davis + Giannis. What we have is the actual impact they had on their actual eras.
This place is a cesspool of mindless ineptitude, mental decrepitude, and intellectual lassitude. I refuse to be sucked any deeper into this whirlpool of groupthink sewage. My opinions have been expressed. I'm going to go take a shower.
ReddoverKobe
Head Coach
Posts: 6,471
And1: 7,477
Joined: Feb 12, 2019
   

Re: Iverson vs Nash 

Post#284 » by ReddoverKobe » Sun Sep 27, 2020 1:29 am

I was kind of shocked nash was in the lead by a lot. Iverson is one of the most overrated players in league history and has a Jordan like cult following.
Camping Fan
Senior
Posts: 686
And1: 218
Joined: May 15, 2017
       

Re: Iverson vs Nash 

Post#285 » by Camping Fan » Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:48 am

70sFan wrote:Nash without thinking twice.

If Nash had stayed with Dallas, him and Dirk would have made some noise... Like you said, not even Close
Lakers 2020
Camping Fan
Senior
Posts: 686
And1: 218
Joined: May 15, 2017
       

Re: Iverson vs Nash 

Post#286 » by Camping Fan » Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:50 am

Ryoga Hibiki wrote:
elchengue20 wrote:You are really arguing that Jamaal Murray is a better shot maker than Allen Iverson? Come on now. I know he was inefficient and sometimes played selfish/hero basketball, but AI is getting ridicolous disrespect here.

The man was 6'0 at best and scored multiple layups and floaters on Shaq, for example. There is a reason he had an stretch where he was the NBA top scorer in like 3 of 4 seasons. Put that player in this era where everything is step up for his type of game and it would be insane.

It is hard to properly evaluate what Murray is, as he never played at this level in his NBA career. So I am answering assuming the improvements we saw are there to stay and he won't regress to his old level.
Anyway, the point is that you must look at what was Iverson's game and how it would translate. As I mentioned, Iverson was more in Westbrook mold, he's going to attack the rim, keep pressure, and as a defense you would be happy to see him settle for a contested jumper, something he was never hitting with consistency.
He never showed the ability to stop on a dime a make those crazy jumpers guys like Murray, Lillard or Curry can hit.



Sent from my Nokia 3210 using RealGM mobile app

Played like champion, but Lebron and Anthony Davis is the best duo in the N BA
Lakers 2020

Return to Player Comparisons