Adelheid wrote:Jim Dolan is at peak thirsty mode. Be prepared

"Leon, give them whatever they want for Donovan Carmelo Anthony Mitchell... right now!"
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Adelheid wrote:Jim Dolan is at peak thirsty mode. Be prepared

HarthorneWingo wrote:Knicksrule2k4 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Sit TF down Dolan and stay out of it
If he gets involved we’re giving up the house
Oh yeah.
HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HEZI wrote:People are underrating Mitchell at this point. He just had a season where he put up numbers as good if not better than Steph Curry who lead the Warriors to another title. Y’all talking about Ainge and the Celtics and Tatum and Brown like they just won the chip when in fact it was the 6’3” guard on the Warriors that destroyed them both. You can absolutely win with Mitchell, problem is Knicks didn’t put the right pieces in place for it. No he doesn’t need to be Luka or prime Lebron or Giannis. Jimmy Butler almost took out the Celtics on his own so get out of this mindset that the Celtics are some gold standard. Jazz didn’t build a team properly around Mitchell, Knicks could have an opportunity but changes will need to be made and pieces will need to be moved. This can’t / won’t be the group that gets it done. The problem is that the FO would believe that it is and that’s the main issue more than who Mitchell is as a player it’s the supporting cast around him that’s the issue
Ainge fleeced the Nets for Tatum and Brown, those were their picks, that should be enough of a warning sign on what we're about to do. Mitchell isn't Curry, there's only 1 Curry and people gotta stop comparing other players to him.
The Heat didn't trade Bam, Herro and 4 first rounders to get Jimmy, none of these other examples dumped everything they had into getting 1 guy. The only team that did that in recent history and won anything are the Lakers, AD shot 38% from three in the bubble, now they're looking hopeless, and we don't have a LeBron on our team to offset trading all those players & picks.
It's incredibly hard to trade that many players & picks and field a competitive team in the long term, it's why all these GMs want future picks when they trade their stars, because they're betting against your long term future.
He did so by dumping washed up dudes who had a one year window and it was downhill from there. Knicks am with Mitchell aren’t handing over a top 3 pick to the Jazz anytime soon. We will make the playoffs that’s for sure. Won’t get deep once there most likely but we won’t be in the lotto.
Yeah I’m aware Mitch isn’t Curry just like Im aware Tatum and Brown aren’t Luka or Lebron or Giannis. Mitch is very much in that same tier as both Tatum, Brown, Booker and others.
Giving up that many picks is crazy of course but what is our direction anyway? We are going into year 3 and Obi is still stuck behind Randle. Our other first round picks are stuck in bench roles. Besides RJ we don’t have a promising player who has been given an opportunity to thrive. Is that going to change? With the way we have been spending in free agency? It wasn’t happening and it’s why I was against the signings. The path we took was wrong. There is no turning back at this point. We fuqd up so might as well go all in now. They aren’t going to correct their mistakes and if they do attempt to it will come at a price. We saw it with Kemba. So what now? Trade more picks to dump Randle, Fournier and Mitch and Brunson? Basically would need to give up all those picks involved in the DMitch deal. This is the path they chose so it is what it is now.
Knicksrule2k4 wrote:
snadler wrote:aq_ua wrote:Whenever blockbuster trades take this long, it's not happening. And for the better - I would really really like to see how our young guys look alongside a real point guard.
This statement makes no sense, we often times have no idea how long negotiations last for, but when the Knicks are involved, every detail, rumor, negotiation is being reported, trades may take weeks to get done.
Sprewell4Three wrote:Ainge is going to try to screw the Knicks. If Ainge is asking for too much. Move on. Let Mitchell go to the Heat or w/e
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
knicksNOTslick wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HEZI wrote:People are underrating Mitchell at this point. He just had a season where he put up numbers as good if not better than Steph Curry who lead the Warriors to another title. Y’all talking about Ainge and the Celtics and Tatum and Brown like they just won the chip when in fact it was the 6’3” guard on the Warriors that destroyed them both. You can absolutely win with Mitchell, problem is Knicks didn’t put the right pieces in place for it. No he doesn’t need to be Luka or prime Lebron or Giannis. Jimmy Butler almost took out the Celtics on his own so get out of this mindset that the Celtics are some gold standard. Jazz didn’t build a team properly around Mitchell, Knicks could have an opportunity but changes will need to be made and pieces will need to be moved. This can’t / won’t be the group that gets it done. The problem is that the FO would believe that it is and that’s the main issue more than who Mitchell is as a player it’s the supporting cast around him that’s the issue
Ainge fleeced the Nets for Tatum and Brown, those were their picks, that should be enough of a warning sign on what we're about to do. Mitchell isn't Curry, there's only 1 Curry and people gotta stop comparing other players to him.
The Heat didn't trade Bam, Herro and 4 first rounders to get Jimmy, none of these other examples dumped everything they had into getting 1 guy. The only team that did that in recent history and won anything are the Lakers, AD shot 38% from three in the bubble, now they're looking hopeless, and we don't have a LeBron on our team to offset trading all those players & picks.
It's incredibly hard to trade that many players & picks and field a competitive team in the long term, it's why all these GMs want future picks when they trade their stars, because they're betting against your long term future.
The Nets traded unprotected picks for players way past their prime. What we would be getting is a soon to be 26 year old just about to hit his prime. It depends on the deal. If we get to keep most of our young players, that should be alright. Our FO tends to do better with later picks anyways.
Sprewell4Three wrote:Ainge is going to try to screw the Knicks. If Ainge is asking for too much. Move on. Let Mitchell go to the Heat or w/e
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
snadler wrote:Sprewell4Three wrote:Ainge is going to try to screw the Knicks. If Ainge is asking for too much. Move on. Let Mitchell go to the Heat or w/e
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So just to be clear you prefer Mitchell go to the heat for a much lesser package than the Knicks can offer which it would be just so you can feel better?
KnixtapeH20 wrote:snadler wrote:Sprewell4Three wrote:Ainge is going to try to screw the Knicks. If Ainge is asking for too much. Move on. Let Mitchell go to the Heat or w/e
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So just to be clear you prefer Mitchell go to the heat for a much lesser package than the Knicks can offer which it would be just so you can feel better?
No one gives AF about feeling better bro. It's very clear what he's saying. Do not let this **** screw us and leave us w.o all our picks and young players **** that. Move on like he said if ainge won't budge. We're not the ones that are desperate or NEED to make this move.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:knicksNOTslick wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Ainge fleeced the Nets for Tatum and Brown, those were their picks, that should be enough of a warning sign on what we're about to do. Mitchell isn't Curry, there's only 1 Curry and people gotta stop comparing other players to him.
The Heat didn't trade Bam, Herro and 4 first rounders to get Jimmy, none of these other examples dumped everything they had into getting 1 guy. The only team that did that in recent history and won anything are the Lakers, AD shot 38% from three in the bubble, now they're looking hopeless, and we don't have a LeBron on our team to offset trading all those players & picks.
It's incredibly hard to trade that many players & picks and field a competitive team in the long term, it's why all these GMs want future picks when they trade their stars, because they're betting against your long term future.
The Nets traded unprotected picks for players way past their prime. What we would be getting is a soon to be 26 year old just about to hit his prime. It depends on the deal. If we get to keep most of our young players, that should be alright. Our FO tends to do better with later picks anyways.
The Lakers did that, won a title, now their team looks like it's on welfare and the 26 yr old all-star they traded a kings ransom for isn't as good as they thought. The Nets also traded a lot for Harden, didn't work out.
I'm just not a fan of these kind of trade the farm for 1 guy type deals.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Ainge fleeced the Nets for Tatum and Brown, those were their picks, that should be enough of a warning sign on what we're about to do. Mitchell isn't Curry, there's only 1 Curry and people gotta stop comparing other players to him.
The Heat didn't trade Bam, Herro and 4 first rounders to get Jimmy, none of these other examples dumped everything they had into getting 1 guy. The only team that did that in recent history and won anything are the Lakers, AD shot 38% from three in the bubble, now they're looking hopeless, and we don't have a LeBron on our team to offset trading all those players & picks.
It's incredibly hard to trade that many players & picks and field a competitive team in the long term, it's why all these GMs want future picks when they trade their stars, because they're betting against your long term future.
He did so by dumping washed up dudes who had a one year window and it was downhill from there. Knicks am with Mitchell aren’t handing over a top 3 pick to the Jazz anytime soon. We will make the playoffs that’s for sure. Won’t get deep once there most likely but we won’t be in the lotto.
Yeah I’m aware Mitch isn’t Curry just like Im aware Tatum and Brown aren’t Luka or Lebron or Giannis. Mitch is very much in that same tier as both Tatum, Brown, Booker and others.
Giving up that many picks is crazy of course but what is our direction anyway? We are going into year 3 and Obi is still stuck behind Randle. Our other first round picks are stuck in bench roles. Besides RJ we don’t have a promising player who has been given an opportunity to thrive. Is that going to change? With the way we have been spending in free agency? It wasn’t happening and it’s why I was against the signings. The path we took was wrong. There is no turning back at this point. We fuqd up so might as well go all in now. They aren’t going to correct their mistakes and if they do attempt to it will come at a price. We saw it with Kemba. So what now? Trade more picks to dump Randle, Fournier and Mitch and Brunson? Basically would need to give up all those picks involved in the DMitch deal. This is the path they chose so it is what it is now.
They want a 2029 pick, they know that we won't be giving them any lottery picks right away, they're going to go after picks further out with less protections. The Mitchell thing will be cool for a year or two, then it'll be hard to build a team, because he's on a rookie max extension which means we can't trade for another 1 of those, and we'll have to rely on capspace which hasn't always gone our way, half the big names are locked up already.
The asking price is just too high for him, what is the harm in just going into the season and revisiting the trade at the deadline? If he's traded okay, there will be another one, who's to say SGA doesn't want out after another season where he gets mothballed to preserve the tank. I feel like we should just go into the season with what we have, let Grimes or Cam fight it out for the 2 guard spot, you aren't liking what you're seeing from Grimes right now? You and I actually agree on most of the Knicks moves, in terms of not being high on IQ, hating the Randle move, liking Obi and disliking Mitch. We're really not that far off from having a fun team that may be just as competitive with a brighter future, Randle is really the biggest dark cloud hanging over the team. If he's not there, and Obi is starting things look differently.
Clyde_Style wrote:I truly do not understand how Randle is going to work with Brunson and Mitchell. RJ needs touches too.
They really wanted Brunson, but in order to pair him with Mitchell? Really? I call BS
This is an ad hoc situation fueled by lust for a star, but none of this was planned. Sure, you can say we didn’t know Ainge was going into full rebuild mode in Utah, but our FO probably knew he was going that direction before the Gobert trade and before they signed Brunson.
The only clear plan was they wanted Brunson and they got him.
I’m not even opposed to trading for Mitchell, but how TF are you going to make Randle work in that line-up? YOU WON’T. He will be a disaster. But, yeah, ignore the issue and pretend our roster will be golden. It won’t. Mitchell might be great, but we have a serious roster construction problem with guys wanting touches and it is not resolvable. You can’t convince me Randle will willinglhy play a mostly off the ball game now and take a back seat to the backcourt. He’s going to pout and turn the locker room into a cesspool
Clyde_Style wrote:I truly do not understand how Randle is going to work with Brunson and Mitchell. RJ needs touches too.
They really wanted Brunson, but in order to pair him with Mitchell? Really? I call BS
This is an ad hoc situation fueled by lust for a star, but none of this was planned. Sure, you can say we didn’t know Ainge was going into full rebuild mode in Utah, but our FO probably knew he was going that direction before the Gobert trade and before they signed Brunson.
The only clear plan was they wanted Brunson and they got him.
I’m not even opposed to trading for Mitchell, but how TF are you going to make Randle work in that line-up? YOU WON’T. He will be a disaster. But, yeah, ignore the issue and pretend our roster will be golden. It won’t. Mitchell might be great, but we have a serious roster construction problem with guys wanting touches and it is not resolvable. You can’t convince me Randle will willinglhy play a mostly off the ball game now and take a back seat to the backcourt. He’s going to pout and turn the locker room into a cesspool