RealGM

MCoster wrote:You guys were losing Redick anyway. You got 2 free 2nds. Its unfair to compare this to the Harris deal.

this is the completion of the Harris deal!!!
you guys bitching about Dan giving Hammond's number, boo hoo. He deserves it.

paulpressey25 wrote:I'm trying to catch up. Did Dudley really net the Suns Bledsoe? And the Clips also get Redick as well?

I met Hammond early on in his tenure. I told you guys back then he was an incompetent. I didn't need to see five more offseasons of **** moves to know that. Could tell right away after five minutes of conversation this was a guy the sharks in the league would cut up bigtime.

from what I read
Bucks in: 2 2nds
PHX in:Butler Bledsoe
LAC in:JJ/Dudley

Don't know which team the seconds came from.

you know blowing up the guy's line with **** talking is not only immature but a pretty **** idea overall

Nycballa2k wrote:you know blowing up the guy's line with **** talking is not only immature but a pretty **** idea overall

agree

We didn't want to take Butler's salary.

Gotta keep the Dwight and Paul plan alive!

RogerMurdock wrote:Though I'm not ruling out this being the result of hypoxia caused by an unusually vigorous auto-erotic asphyxiation episode.

RogerMurdock wrote:Though I'm not ruling out this being the result of hypoxia caused by an unusually vigorous auto-erotic asphyxiation episode.

I don't know if its his real number but I texted him saying he'd receive many hateful texts and to hang in there.

Nycballa2k wrote:you know blowing up the guy's line with **** talking is not only immature but a pretty **** idea overall

Kids being kids.

RandyBreuer wrote:

MCoster wrote:You guys were losing Redick anyway. You got 2 free 2nds. Its unfair to compare this to the Harris deal.

this is the completion of the Harris deal!!!
you guys bitching about Dan giving Hammond's number, boo hoo. He deserves it.

I don't think a person deserves to be harassed by anonymous faces on the internet because they don't like his moves. I dislike his moves as much as the next guy but come on.

Also **** move on your part caving to the pressure Dano

Whoa, Dano gave it out? Now he's going to change his number.

I don't want to type out my text in post

Nobody is giving up a first for Redick.

Nycballa2k wrote:you know blowing up the guy's line with **** talking is not only immature but a pretty **** idea overall

Why does it matter? What has he done for us? He won't even read the messages anyway...and if he does, awesome for us.

RandyBreuer wrote:

MCoster wrote:You guys were losing Redick anyway. You got 2 free 2nds. Its unfair to compare this to the Harris deal.

this is the completion of the Harris deal!!!
you guys bitching about Dan giving Hammond's number, boo hoo. He deserves it.

Hammond deserves to be questioned by a competent media.
He does not deserved to be harassed by dumb fans.

emunney wrote:Dudley on his cheap deal is absolutely crucial to this deal. I don't know how we make a deal work for the Clippers as well as toys one does. Send a first or Henson to the Suns? We have the least leverage here because every other party had options. We don't participate, Redick can just sign someplace else.

We're all hot because being this close to getting a solid asset from the Tobes deal falls flat. Thus we are underrating Dudley as an asset (he's more valuable than Redick considering salaries)...but Trader John continues to show he can't get a good deal done with trades. I wouldn't have included Ersan to get the deal done and so I guess Udoh, Luc, etc weren't enough. Still Udoh and Luc are solid role players on decent deals and while they might not be as good as Dudley...it's just not out of the possibility if the Bucks had a competent GM they could of made it work (throw in Wolters/2nds). Cut out PHX and deal Udoh or Luc, etc. to another team that sent LAC a swingman...jesus anything but bending over and only taking 2 2nds...ahhhhhhhhhhhhh!

glenn wrote:

Almost-A-Yooper wrote:

trwi7 wrote:
If they want to trade Bledsoe straight up for Dudley, let them but you had leverage here to get something better than two **** 2nds and he blew it. Again.

What leverage did the Bucks have? Redick could've just signed with a different team and the Bucks wouldn't have gotten anything. The Clippers could've just traded Bledsoe somewhere else or have kept him.

Um, that IS the leverage. If they wanted Redick, they would have to play ball. Give it more than 24 hours before you quit and take two virtually useless picks.

I get that the leverage is the Clippers wanting Redick but I'm sure wasn't their only option for trading Bledsoe. Clippers could've quite literally have been the Bucks only option for getting anything for Redick.

I texted to please tank and just say no to BJ3 and the crop of SG's

I was just sitting at my desk thinking about what I've done, and I started to feel bad.

But then I thought about it. My team is a sinking ship that drives me crazy. I don't feel one bit bad. Like PP said, nobody knows what the **** they're doing.

floppymoose wrote:Nobody is giving up a first for Redick.

This man did.