NoDopeOnSundays wrote:knicksNOTslick wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
The Lakers did that, won a title, now their team looks like it's on welfare and the 26 yr old all-star they traded a kings ransom for isn't as good as they thought. The Nets also traded a lot for Harden, didn't work out.
I'm just not a fan of these kind of trade the farm for 1 guy type deals.
You wouldn't trade the farm for a title? Are you a Knicks fan. We haven't won since the 70s.
The Anthony Davis trade worked out since they got a ring out of it. Who cares if you're on welfare afterwards. Totally worth it. Bad example.
They traded for Harden past his prime. He was, what? 31? And the dude doesn't take care of his body, coming in to camp out of shape. Completely unprofessional. The red flags were apparent.
Do we have LeBron James on our team right now? You do this type of trade if you already have that guy on your team, you don't do this to get someone who isn't a top 10 player.
We don't but for the right price, Donovan Mitchell is the move to make. If we could keep some of our young players and give up at most 2 unprotected picks along with the other 1st rounders we can give, that's the move to make.
We were never gonna tank at this current rate. Our picks are gonna be in the 8th to 20th overall, not bad enough for a top 3, not good enough to be a contender.
We don't have a LeBron yet but if we have a solid squad, we can keep improving slowly, enjoy the ride to 2nd round or whatever, better our image and attract FAs to join up eventually maybe 3 to 4 years down the line and be actual contenders.
Currently we have too many young players that need time to shine. Let's consolidate and see what they can do with playing time, for those that are left here.