ImageImageImageImageImage

Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie

Moderator: JaysRule25

User avatar
Ong_dynasty
Head Coach
Posts: 6,393
And1: 361
Joined: May 28, 2003
Location: London
         

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#341 » by Ong_dynasty » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:19 pm

I actually like Marcum (and our "big 4").
But for all AA has done since he has become the manager, I have to trust him on this one.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,534
And1: 22,600
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#342 » by Randle McMurphy » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:28 pm

Avenger wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
Selling high only makes sense if you are getting good value. The Jays didn't.


that's what you said about Wallace and he went on to hit .222 with a 13:1 K/BB ratio

In how many AB?

Wallace's ceiling may be pretty low for a 1B, but let's not pretend like a sample size of that size means anything at all.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 41,534
And1: 22,600
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#343 » by Randle McMurphy » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:30 pm

flatjacket1 wrote:We traded Roy Halladay for a prospect and people are cool, we trade Marcum for a prospect and people aren't.

They was no real choice but to trade Halladay after he denied their request for a contract extension. Keeping him for one year wouldn't have served much purpose in 2010.

Marcum's situation is quite a bit different.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Strav
Rookie
Posts: 1,096
And1: 15
Joined: Oct 21, 2004

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#344 » by Strav » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:41 pm

I was a huge fan of Marcum pre major injury thinking he was good as Roy in many respects. However, with that injury happening and that little bit of flare up last season, I was basically resigned to him being traded at some point particularly after his recent success. If we're looking for a #1 pitcher in the starting rotation (Marcum wasn't that guy), and if it means Lawrie is an added trade piece (crossing my fingers we keep Drabek) to land Greinke, then I love, love this deal. Otherwise, meh.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,372
And1: 14,415
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#345 » by dagger » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:44 pm

Orioles not standing pat:

Buster_ESPN
Deal that sends Mark Reynolds to Orioles will have David Hernandez and Kam Mickolio headed to Arizona.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
LBJSeizedMyID
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,547
And1: 96
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#346 » by LBJSeizedMyID » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:52 pm

Imagine the D'Backs use Hernandez as a starter again, otherwise this trade makes even less sense. O's got a good deal without having to include Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta or Zach Britton.
User avatar
rarefind
RealGM
Posts: 12,574
And1: 10,458
Joined: May 25, 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#347 » by rarefind » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:56 pm

O's make out like bandits on that one.
User avatar
tempests_dawn
RealGM
Posts: 11,022
And1: 1,664
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
       

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#348 » by tempests_dawn » Mon Dec 6, 2010 4:57 pm

Question: When does Marcum become an FA?
User avatar
rarefind
RealGM
Posts: 12,574
And1: 10,458
Joined: May 25, 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#349 » by rarefind » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:09 pm

tempests_dawn wrote:Question: When does Marcum become an FA?


2 more years of arb.
Hoopstarr
RealGM
Posts: 22,477
And1: 10,393
Joined: Feb 21, 2006
     

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#350 » by Hoopstarr » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:12 pm

-MetA4- wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:We live in a world where Dan Uggla just got traded for Omar Infante and a reliever.


Doesn't that prove my point? An all-star type player getting traded and not bringing back a single stud, MLB-ready prospect.

LIke I said; the MLB-ready stud prospects are almost all off limits unless you are talking a trade for a true star player, which Marcum obviously isn't. Roy Oswalt brought back a backage headlined by Happ and Anthony Gose. Dan Haren Brought back Saunders, an A+ ball pitcher, and an A-ball pitcher. Victor Martinez got traded for Hagadone/Masterson.


Yes. Randle, please explain just what the hell you wanted back for Marcum, since you agreed also that Marcum should have been traded. Would some throw-in and have done it for you? Is that what these 24 pages are about?
User avatar
tempests_dawn
RealGM
Posts: 11,022
And1: 1,664
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
       

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#351 » by tempests_dawn » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:17 pm

rarefind wrote:
tempests_dawn wrote:Question: When does Marcum become an FA?


2 more years of arb.


Thanks.

So in 2 years time, what time of money would Marcum warrant on the FA market?

Ted Lilly/Gil Meche/Burnett money? Would the Jays be wise to give that type of contract to Marcum?

Not a rhetorical question here...

But I think the answer you give also shapes your view on this trade.
Komodo
Banned User
Posts: 12,002
And1: 795
Joined: May 07, 2007

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#352 » by Komodo » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:23 pm

Just finished reading through all 23 pages. So let me get this straight; it's a good trade if Lawrie can develop into a 30 HR player, but not it he turns out be a 20 HR player, due to his defensive shortcomings and basically being a guy without a position.

Definitely some risk.
Sister
Rookie
Posts: 1,070
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 17, 2001

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#353 » by Sister » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:25 pm

trwi7 wrote:
terryoh wrote:Do we know the full deal though? I'm reading the Blue Jays message board and I'll quote one of the posters:

we won't know for sure if it is just lawrie straight up because they can't say anything official until after friday's rule 5 draft...till then they are leaks or assumptions on it being only one player and who it is...though more than likely it is just lawrie, we are not sure if there is anybody else yet coming our way


http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/111363479.html

Not sure why they wouldn't be able to say anything official until after the Rule 5 draft.



Because Minor League rosters are frozen until after the Rule V draft (thus all the leaks and no official reports).
User avatar
torontoaces04
Analyst
Posts: 3,365
And1: 518
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Contact:
       

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#354 » by torontoaces04 » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:25 pm

dagger wrote:Orioles not standing pat:

Buster_ESPN
Deal that sends Mark Reynolds to Orioles will have David Hernandez and Kam Mickolio headed to Arizona.



I don't want anyone on my team (besides Pitchers of course) who hit in the low .200 consistantly, I don't care how many homers he can hit. I can't see his numbers getting any better either considering the strength of our division.
LBJSeizedMyID
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,547
And1: 96
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#355 » by LBJSeizedMyID » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:26 pm

komodo19 wrote:Just finished reading through all 23 pages. So let me get this straight; it's a good trade if Lawrie can develop into a 30 HR player, but not it he turns out be a 20 HR player, due to his defensive shortcomings and basically being a guy without a position.

Definitely some risk.


No, its' a good trade if the Jays are in rebuild mode, which we are. We're one year removed from Trading Roy Halladay and it doesn't take one year to rebuild a team. Ask any Leaf fan and they'll tell you the same thing. The Jays get a top prospect in return for Marcum.

The debate really is more at which direction the team is going then anything else.
Sister
Rookie
Posts: 1,070
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 17, 2001

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#356 » by Sister » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:26 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
flatjacket1 wrote:We traded Roy Halladay for a prospect and people are cool, we trade Marcum for a prospect and people aren't.

They was no real choice but to trade Halladay after he denied their request for a contract extension. Keeping him for one year wouldn't have served much purpose in 2010.

Marcum's situation is quite a bit different.


It's different, but not that much. AA asked Marcum's about signing an extension to buy out his first couple of years of free agency. Marcum decline indicating a desire to move closer to home (in the mid-west).
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,150
And1: 7,553
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#357 » by J-Roc » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:27 pm

dagger wrote:Orioles not standing pat:

Buster_ESPN
Deal that sends Mark Reynolds to Orioles will have David Hernandez and Kam Mickolio headed to Arizona.


That joker has the Jays on his no-trade list. We need to boo his assssss huge when he comes to town.
Sister
Rookie
Posts: 1,070
And1: 57
Joined: Jul 17, 2001

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#358 » by Sister » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:29 pm

rarefind wrote:O's make out like bandits on that one.


Not really. Pretty even trade in fact. Reynolds has struck out over 200 times in each of the last three years and had an OPS last year of 753. And now he is coming to the toughest division in baseball.

Good luck.
augustine
Senior
Posts: 505
And1: 29
Joined: Oct 17, 2006

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#359 » by augustine » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:40 pm

LBJSeizedMyID wrote:
No, its' a good trade if the Jays are in rebuild mode, which we are. We're one year removed from Trading Roy Halladay and it doesn't take one year to rebuild a team. Ask any Leaf fan and they'll tell you the same thing. The Jays get a top prospect in return for Marcum.

The debate really is more at which direction the team is going then anything else.


Indeed. So, if AA is willing to deal Marcum, at his peak, before his big raise, because he is too old to fit the core during contention, why won't he do the same with say, Bautista, who is also at peak value, is just before a big raise, and is older than Marcum. If we are really rebuilding, deal Bautista for a young OF prospect. I keep getting mixed messages from AA. He seems to be rebuiding, then he gives up our prospects for 30 year old Rajai Davis, or 28 year old Escobar.
User avatar
torontoaces04
Analyst
Posts: 3,365
And1: 518
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Contact:
       

Re: Shaun Marcum Traded to the Brewers for Brett Lawrie 

Post#360 » by torontoaces04 » Mon Dec 6, 2010 5:40 pm

Sister wrote:
rarefind wrote:O's make out like bandits on that one.


Not really. Pretty even trade in fact. Reynolds has struck out over 200 times in each of the last three years and had an OPS last year of 753. And now he is coming to the toughest division in baseball.

Good luck.


Sing it sista! :wink:

Return to Toronto Blue Jays