wafer88 wrote:
Granted, I'll completely agree that a lot of Laker fans are being repetitive and are failing to see your whole point...however, read what you just posted. Look at your first statement. You didn't say the Laker's got away with anything, but you did say "the NBA will not do anything too bad to the Lakers, they benefit more by the Lakers being good.". Those are your exact words, yet you never supported any evidence for that claim. That's why those arguing with you keep saying "tell me what the Lakers got away with", because that is what your statement is heavily implying.
If you're saying "The NBA will not do anything to bad to the Lakers, they benefit more by the Lakers being good.", and that is your argument, those arguing against you absoloutely have the right to say "wait, what is your evidence that supports this statement.".
Now since you are reiterating that you never said "the lakers got away with anything", which is true, then that implies that you have no evidence to support your claim, other than your opinion.
What the other side is arguing, though maybe not perfectly, is this simple:
"If the NBA won't do anything too bad to the Lakers because they benefit more by the Lakers good (your claim), then why is there no example of this ever happening in the past."
I'm not saying I 100% agree with that argument, or that I 100% think you're incorrect. I'm just saying it's a valid argument.
If I say the following as a laker fan : " Of course the league will come down hard on the lakers....all the owners are jealous of the lakers and their success" (certainly not something I slightly believe in or would ever say). Wouldn't you respond with " what have other owners ever done to make you think that?". Then I can of course say "I never said the other owners have ever done anything to make me think that, i never said that!". Then wouldn't you say, " Then where is the evidence to support your original claim...other than your possibly biased opinion?" ?
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not saying the others have done a great job arguing their point. I'm just saying, it's a valid thing to ask for someone to support a claim they made. It doesn't mean if they can't support the claim the claim isn't true, but it does certainly make the claim weaker when the person arguing for it can't bring up any past examples to support it, don't you think?
Well, as I said earlier, I think the NBA cares a lot about money and will do certain things to influence the way things go to ensure they make as much money as they can.
The NBA benefits more when the Lakers are successful. As I've said, its nothing to do with the Lakers, its my belief on the NBA.