ImageImageImage

Welcome Zhaire Smith

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, sixers hoops, Foshan

Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,485
And1: 22,251
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#341 » by Revived » Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:33 am

Read on Twitter
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#342 » by LloydFree » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:59 am

Revived wrote:
LloydFree wrote:Brett Brown learned well under Hinkie and watching Danny Ainge fleece teams.

His team itself got fleeced by Ainge last draft.

A learning point
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
Ben
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,806
And1: 2,941
Joined: Feb 09, 2006

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#343 » by Ben » Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:07 pm

LloydFree wrote:I don't think there has been more than one or two trade-ups in the Draft Lottery era, that have been beneficial to the team that traded up.


Portland trading up from #4 to #2 (with Chicago) for LaMarcus Aldridge AND a Bulls 2007 2nd round draft pick. Bulls got Tyrus Thomas and, for the boon of trading down two spots and giving up a 2007 2nd rounder they got... wait for it... the draft rights to Viktor Khryapa. Which weren't even worth the 2007 2nd rounder. :oops:
( was one of many who hated that move when it happened. Small wonder.)
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,704
And1: 17,329
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#344 » by Negrodamus » Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:08 pm

Revived wrote:
Read on Twitter


Holy cherrypicked stats.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#345 » by Sixerscan » Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:15 pm

Ben wrote:
LloydFree wrote:I don't think there has been more than one or two trade-ups in the Draft Lottery era, that have been beneficial to the team that traded up.


Portland trading up from #4 to #2 (with Chicago) for LaMarcus Aldridge AND a Bulls 2007 2nd round draft pick. Bulls got Tyrus Thomas and, for the boon of trading down two spots and giving up a 2007 2nd rounder they got... wait for it... the draft rights to Viktor Khryapa. Which weren't even worth the 2007 2nd rounder. :oops:
( was one of many who hated that move when it happened. Small wonder.)


The Jazz traded up for mitchell just last year...
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#346 » by LloydFree » Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:18 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
Revived wrote:
Read on Twitter


Holy cherrypicked stats.

Not really. Freshman Guards don't get 5 rebounds per game, and 71% FT shooting is very good for a Freshman. Drawing conclusions from scouting boxscores, is a different matter.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,712
And1: 18,968
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#347 » by Stanford » Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:31 pm

He wasn't a guard though. He played the 4.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#348 » by LloydFree » Wed Jun 27, 2018 12:48 pm

Stanford wrote:He wasn't a guard though. He played the 4.

That's why drawing conclusions from a boxscore in college game is a faulty way to assess prospects. The way coaches use a player in their system, has a huge impact on their numbers.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,704
And1: 17,329
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#349 » by Negrodamus » Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:05 pm

LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Revived wrote:
Read on Twitter


Holy cherrypicked stats.

Not really. Freshman Guards don't get 5 rebounds per game, and 71% FT shooting is very good for a Freshman. Drawing conclusions from scouting boxscores, is a different matter.


All of those stats are without context. If a prospect is playing 35+ minutes a game, 5 rpg, 1 spg, and 1 bpg isn't outrageous production.

If he's shooting 2 FT per game, 71% isn't great (I don't think it's very good for a freshman anyway). We know that all of the above isn't the case with Zhaire because we've been following him, but those stats mean nothing without context. In the same vein, those stats were not produced as a "G", so all of this is moot.

And if we're including the "F" in this statement, Jayson Tatum did it a year earlier. Does he not fit under the "F" in G/F?
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#350 » by Sixerscan » Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:09 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Holy cherrypicked stats.

Not really. Freshman Guards don't get 5 rebounds per game, and 71% FT shooting is very good for a Freshman. Drawing conclusions from scouting boxscores, is a different matter.


All of those stats are without context. If a prospect is playing 35+ minutes a game, 5 rpg, 1 spg, and 1 bpg isn't outrageous production.

If he's shooting 2 FT per game, 71% isn't great (I don't think it's very good for a freshman anyway). We know that all of the above isn't the case with Zhaire because we've been following him, but those stats mean nothing without context. In the same vein, those stats were not produced as a "G", so all of this is moot.

And if we're including the "F" in this statement, Jayson Tatum did it a year earlier. Does he not fit under the "F" in G/F?


Let's add 50+% shooting from the field then! :D

I assume they're using BBR's positional designations or whatever and Tatum is a straight F.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,704
And1: 17,329
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#351 » by Negrodamus » Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:15 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
LloydFree wrote:Not really. Freshman Guards don't get 5 rebounds per game, and 71% FT shooting is very good for a Freshman. Drawing conclusions from scouting boxscores, is a different matter.


All of those stats are without context. If a prospect is playing 35+ minutes a game, 5 rpg, 1 spg, and 1 bpg isn't outrageous production.

If he's shooting 2 FT per game, 71% isn't great (I don't think it's very good for a freshman anyway). We know that all of the above isn't the case with Zhaire because we've been following him, but those stats mean nothing without context. In the same vein, those stats were not produced as a "G", so all of this is moot.

And if we're including the "F" in this statement, Jayson Tatum did it a year earlier. Does he not fit under the "F" in G/F?


Let's add 50+% shooting from the field then! :D

I assume they're using BBR's positional designations or whatever and Tatum is a straight F.


Interesting, even less context. I'm going to need a list of every "G/F" of the past 10 years to interpret if this tweet was worth reading.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,328
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#352 » by Sixerscan » Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:16 pm

Negrodamus wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
All of those stats are without context. If a prospect is playing 35+ minutes a game, 5 rpg, 1 spg, and 1 bpg isn't outrageous production.

If he's shooting 2 FT per game, 71% isn't great (I don't think it's very good for a freshman anyway). We know that all of the above isn't the case with Zhaire because we've been following him, but those stats mean nothing without context. In the same vein, those stats were not produced as a "G", so all of this is moot.

And if we're including the "F" in this statement, Jayson Tatum did it a year earlier. Does he not fit under the "F" in G/F?


Let's add 50+% shooting from the field then! :D

I assume they're using BBR's positional designations or whatever and Tatum is a straight F.


Interesting, even less context. I'm going to need a list of every "G/F" of the past 10 years to interpret if this tweet was worth reading.


You have the technology.
Negrodamus
RealGM
Posts: 26,704
And1: 17,329
Joined: Aug 05, 2004

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#353 » by Negrodamus » Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:21 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
Negrodamus wrote:
Sixerscan wrote:
Let's add 50+% shooting from the field then! :D

I assume they're using BBR's positional designations or whatever and Tatum is a straight F.


Interesting, even less context. I'm going to need a list of every "G/F" of the past 10 years to interpret if this tweet was worth reading.


You have the technology.


I was saying that more facetiously. "G/F" isn't a thing in my book.
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#354 » by LloydFree » Wed Jun 27, 2018 1:24 pm

Ben wrote:
LloydFree wrote:I don't think there has been more than one or two trade-ups in the Draft Lottery era, that have been beneficial to the team that traded up.


Portland trading up from #4 to #2 (with Chicago) for LaMarcus Aldridge AND a Bulls 2007 2nd round draft pick. Bulls got Tyrus Thomas and, for the boon of trading down two spots and giving up a 2007 2nd rounder they got... wait for it... the draft rights to Viktor Khryapa. Which weren't even worth the 2007 2nd rounder. :oops:
( was one of many who hated that move when it happened. Small wonder.)

Yep. That's was a great one. The other that always comes to my mind is Utah going from 6 to 3, with Portland (Webster)

to get Deron Williams. But even then they messed that up, because they passed on Chris Paul at #4, to get Deron Williams.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
rzzzzz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,680
And1: 1,759
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
 

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#355 » by rzzzzz » Wed Jun 27, 2018 2:38 pm

Revived wrote:
rzzzzz wrote:considering the amount of improvement (allegedly) in his shot between the NCAAs and his draft workouts, i can't wait for summer league. while not a finished project, hopefully, that should give us some indication if he's as fast a learner as Brett says.

If he gets traded to the Spurs, imagine what Chip Engelland (aka shot doctor) will do with him! :o


yeah, there is a strong trade possibility, which i don't like to think about, 'cause this kid looks really special.
MambaJuice
Junior
Posts: 367
And1: 194
Joined: Jun 29, 2016
       

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#356 » by MambaJuice » Wed Jun 27, 2018 2:40 pm

https://www.libertyballers.com/2018/6/26/17504296/youth-experience-and-zhaire-smith

Interesting article. Basically posits that when it comes to prospects with similar stats you always take the younger guy. Uses baseball prospects for examples as apparently stats weren't readily available for basketball.

I'm still not expecting much from Zhaire this year outside of defense, highlight dunks and hitting some wide open, uncontested 3s. But it is important to remember how young he is. Hopefully the future is bright.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,005
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#357 » by Kobblehead » Wed Jun 27, 2018 3:16 pm

I wish these guys would stop getting compared. Bridges is an accomplished 3&D wing with PF length. Smith is a defensive specialist with SG length.
Wilfried
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,367
And1: 2,051
Joined: May 24, 2007

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#358 » by Wilfried » Wed Jun 27, 2018 3:19 pm

Am I wrong to view him as a Richard Jefferson type of player?
Bum Adebayo
General Manager
Posts: 7,711
And1: 4,075
Joined: Apr 28, 2016

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#359 » by Bum Adebayo » Wed Jun 27, 2018 3:24 pm

And one is 3 years older.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,844
And1: 20,005
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Welcome Zhaire Smith 

Post#360 » by Kobblehead » Wed Jun 27, 2018 3:53 pm

I wouldn't compare them even if they were the same age. They're just different players with different physical profiles.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers