Thunder Offseason Thread
Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
oreojenkins
- Sophomore
- Posts: 214
- And1: 140
- Joined: Jun 26, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Would this basic structure make sense for both sides?
Adams, Gallo, Ferguson for Brown, Hayward, Ojeleye
Boston's frontcourt could use a little help, we add Brown to our core, maybe rehab Hayward's value but also maybe not. Saves us $10 million this year. I could see us getting a weak 1st, but honestly I'd just be happy to add someone like Brown.
Adams, Gallo, Ferguson for Brown, Hayward, Ojeleye
Boston's frontcourt could use a little help, we add Brown to our core, maybe rehab Hayward's value but also maybe not. Saves us $10 million this year. I could see us getting a weak 1st, but honestly I'd just be happy to add someone like Brown.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
slick_watts
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 16,545
- And1: 6,802
- Joined: Jan 03, 2005
- Location: Miami, FL
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
oreojenkins wrote:Would this basic structure make sense for both sides?
Adams, Gallo, Ferguson for Brown, Hayward, Ojeleye
Boston's frontcourt could use a little help, we add Brown to our core, maybe rehab Hayward's value but also maybe not. Saves us $10 million this year. I could see us getting a weak 1st, but honestly I'd just be happy to add someone like Brown.
brown is going to be rfa next summer if he's not extended. i think we can get a 1st for gallinari whenever. doesn't save much in the way of future $. meh.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- jake_swivel
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,460
- And1: 1,079
- Joined: Jul 07, 2019
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
oreojenkins wrote:Would this basic structure make sense for both sides?
Adams, Gallo, Ferguson for Brown, Hayward, Ojeleye
Boston's frontcourt could use a little help, we add Brown to our core, maybe rehab Hayward's value but also maybe not. Saves us $10 million this year. I could see us getting a weak 1st, but honestly I'd just be happy to add someone like Brown.
I think the Thunder are 2 years away from adding pieces with long term salary (Heyward) or will be up for a new contract (Brown). Hard to gauge Brown's value, but considering Harrison Barnes just got 20 per, I'd say Brown will get more, especially considering he'll likely be one of the top free agents and he's restricted.
49
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,404
- And1: 7,539
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
I really like Brown but doesn't fit our timeline.
Don't know if we can get a first for Gallo given his salary (maybe at the deadline if the right team needs him)
Doesn't worth it
Don't know if we can get a first for Gallo given his salary (maybe at the deadline if the right team needs him)
Doesn't worth it
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
oreojenkins
- Sophomore
- Posts: 214
- And1: 140
- Joined: Jun 26, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
I can see why we wouldn't or they wouldn't honestly. I just like Brown and would prefer him to adding more draft picks. Celtics not paying Brown would possibly be a motivating factor, shifting that money to bolster their frontcourt. Having Adams would help given Philly's size. Robert Williams could just hit though and they have no reason to do it.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
oreojenkins
- Sophomore
- Posts: 214
- And1: 140
- Joined: Jun 26, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Dadouv47 wrote:I really like Brown but doesn't fit our timeline.
Don't know if we can get a first for Gallo given his salary (maybe at the deadline if the right team needs him)
Doesn't worth it
He's 23 next season and we're likely going to have ample room to extend him if it were to happen. Think 23 y/o Brown and 21 y/o SGA would be pretty much a dream start to a rebuild. I get not wanting to pay someone next season.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,404
- And1: 7,539
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
oreojenkins wrote:I can see why we wouldn't or they wouldn't honestly. I just like Brown and would prefer him to adding more draft picks. Celtics not paying Brown would possibly be a motivating factor, shifting that money to bolster their frontcourt. Having Adams would help given Philly's size. Robert Williams could just hit though and they have no reason to do it.
I really like Brown as well but doesn't fit our time line. We need to target younger guys like Musa (that's going to be expensive), Jonathan Isaac, Kennard etc
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,404
- And1: 7,539
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
I really wanted to start our rebuild with SGA + Herro but Miami didn't want to overpay for Westbrook 
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- jake_swivel
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,460
- And1: 1,079
- Joined: Jul 07, 2019
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
In my opinion the next year looks like:
Step 1: move Paul
Step 2: trade Galli and whatever expiring you get back from the Paul trade (likely Dragic) at the deadline for picks/youngish guys/solid vets. If you can get an expiring contract in exchange for Schroder's, do it.
Step 3: wait and see what you have with the young guys
Feels like any other moves would be minor during the upcoming season unless you get a godfather offer for Adams. Wait for next offseason or beyond to commit to any large contracts beyond 2021. Above all, aim for flexibility.
Step 1: move Paul
Step 2: trade Galli and whatever expiring you get back from the Paul trade (likely Dragic) at the deadline for picks/youngish guys/solid vets. If you can get an expiring contract in exchange for Schroder's, do it.
Step 3: wait and see what you have with the young guys
Feels like any other moves would be minor during the upcoming season unless you get a godfather offer for Adams. Wait for next offseason or beyond to commit to any large contracts beyond 2021. Above all, aim for flexibility.
49
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,362
- And1: 19,211
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
oreojenkins wrote:I can see why we wouldn't or they wouldn't honestly. I just like Brown and would prefer him to adding more draft picks. Celtics not paying Brown would possibly be a motivating factor, shifting that money to bolster their frontcourt. Having Adams would help given Philly's size. Robert Williams could just hit though and they have no reason to do it.
I’m with you on brown. I don’t think he’s a superstar but he’s a guy that could help us win games and accelerate a rebuild. I just can’t imagine getting any kind of a fair deal from Ainge.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- jake_swivel
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,460
- And1: 1,079
- Joined: Jul 07, 2019
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
ThunderBolt wrote:oreojenkins wrote:I can see why we wouldn't or they wouldn't honestly. I just like Brown and would prefer him to adding more draft picks. Celtics not paying Brown would possibly be a motivating factor, shifting that money to bolster their frontcourt. Having Adams would help given Philly's size. Robert Williams could just hit though and they have no reason to do it.
I’m with you on brown. I don’t think he’s a superstar but he’s a guy that could help us win games and accelerate a rebuild. I just can’t imagine getting any kind of a fair deal from Ainge.
I hear he likes draft picks
49
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,404
- And1: 7,539
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
jake_swivel wrote:In my opinion the next year looks like:
Step 1: move Paul
Step 2: trade Galli and whatever expiring you get back from the Paul trade (likely Dragic) at the deadline for picks/youngish guys/solid vets. If you can get an expiring contract in exchange for Schroder's, do it.
Step 3: wait and see what you have with the young guys
Feels like any other moves would be minor during the upcoming season unless you get a godfather offer for Adams. Wait for next offseason or beyond to commit to any large contracts beyond 2021.
Step 1 is going to happen soon. Step 2, hope we can trade Gallo for a pick or young guy. Who knows what can happen with Schroeder (not likely but a desperate team could trade an expiring and a 2nd for Schroeder). That would be awesome.
Step 3 : figuring out what to do with Adams next offseason. I don't know what he wants (or Presti) but he's still young so I would be happy to keep him for a smaller contract. Otherwise I think he will have some trade value next offseason.
(Then the classic step 4 : draft a bunch of very athletic young guys with a lot of length that can't shoot)
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Thunder Up
- Senior
- Posts: 616
- And1: 197
- Joined: Jun 26, 2017
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
I don't know how many times I need to say it... Herro is not a cornerstone piece of a rebuild, he is a decent 7th or 8th man at best
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,404
- And1: 7,539
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
ThunderBolt wrote:oreojenkins wrote:I can see why we wouldn't or they wouldn't honestly. I just like Brown and would prefer him to adding more draft picks. Celtics not paying Brown would possibly be a motivating factor, shifting that money to bolster their frontcourt. Having Adams would help given Philly's size. Robert Williams could just hit though and they have no reason to do it.
I’m with you on brown. I don’t think he’s a superstar but he’s a guy that could help us win games and accelerate a rebuild. I just can’t imagine getting any kind of a fair deal from Ainge.
That's why I don't want him. I love Brown but Boston will ask way too much for him. Not worth it.
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- jake_swivel
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,460
- And1: 1,079
- Joined: Jul 07, 2019
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Thunder Up wrote:I don't know how many times I need to say it... Herro is not a cornerstone piece of a rebuild, he is a decent 7th or 8th man at best
The Miami fascination with him is weird.
49
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Kizz Fastfists
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,437
- And1: 1,868
- Joined: Jun 05, 2014
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Thunder Up wrote:I don't know how many times I need to say it... Herro is not a cornerstone piece of a rebuild, he is a decent 7th or 8th man at best
I think he can be your 5th/6th best player on a contender. Either starting SG or 6th man his combo guard ability lends itself well to that role. He is not your all-star building block, but he should become a quality performer.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Kizz Fastfists
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,437
- And1: 1,868
- Joined: Jun 05, 2014
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
jake_swivel wrote:The Miami fascination with him is weird.
All they have is Butler, Winslow, Bam and Herro. I understand them wanting to believe Bam and Herro are going to be Shaq and Kobe. It is all they have to cling to for any chance at being good in the next few years.
"The secret to success is to offend the greatest number of people." -George Bernard Shaw
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- ThunderBolt
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 19,362
- And1: 19,211
- Joined: Dec 29, 2016
- Location: Lynnwood, WA
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
Here’s a boring take- maybe it’s way too early to know if he’ll be any good.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
-
Dadouv47
- Forum Mod - Thunder

- Posts: 13,404
- And1: 7,539
- Joined: Mar 22, 2015
-
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
ThunderBolt wrote:Here’s a boring take- maybe it’s way too early to know if he’ll be any good.
I was going to say this

Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
- jake_swivel
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,460
- And1: 1,079
- Joined: Jul 07, 2019
Re: Thunder Offseason Thread
ThunderBolt wrote:Here’s a boring take- maybe it’s way too early to know if he’ll be any good.
For sure. But projection is part of the game. Right now we know he has below average height for his position with a wingspan that is below average for his height. We know his best skill is his shooting and he shot a pretty average 35% from 3 in college (although he shot an elite 95% from the line) which suggests he will have problems creating his own shot. I don't see point guard skills and I don't see him being able to guard his position. Seems like a poor man's Malik Monk.
49
Return to Oklahoma City Thunder

