KGtabake wrote:Mephariel wrote:KGtabake wrote:
The fact that the US is the best at basketball cannot be doubted by anyone.
It would be insane not to be with a population of 330 millions though.
What should trouble you is how Serbia, a nation of 4 millions has the same amount of golds as you in world championships.
Safe to say that if Serbia had the same population as yours(which means a far greater pool to pick players) they would have been the far and away best.
But not the Olympic, when the best US players play. By your logic, India and China should have the best basketball players right? If Serbia has a population of 330 million, the country would have developed differently. Basketball may not even be that popular.
Also, countries like Serbia hides behind single-elimination tournaments. How many times is Serbia going to beat USA in a seven game series?
China and India don't have basketball tradition like US and Serbia. So why bring them up?
Secondly, what do you mean 7 game series?
The Olympics are also a single elimination tournament.
Do you want the Olympics and FIBA tournaments to be series? It cannot happen because it will take 2 months.
Serbia has beaten the US twice in world championships in the last 20 years and one of them was in the United States in 2002.
It ain't a small thing for such a new nation (created in 1991).
No one cares about the world championships. The best player we sent in 2002 was Paul Pierce lol. Raef LaFrentz and Antonio Davis were on the team. As if winning anything against that version of a U.S. team means anything.