ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: We survived 4-1

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,887
And1: 54,390
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#381 » by Deeeez Knicks » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:18 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:I'm just glad to root for wins and get them. Haven't been able to focus on the games with the passing of my girlfriend almost 3 weeks ago. Tonight I saw some slop at the end bt they were clearly the better team. 4-1 and looking like a solid playoff contender so far. Plenty of games to play and fix any issues. On to the next one.


Damn man. Very sorry to hear of your loss.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Adelheid
RealGM
Posts: 11,373
And1: 7,611
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
 

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#382 » by Adelheid » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:18 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Where is the path to upgrade the Knicks?

Which position should it happen at or which player?

Let's assume the Knicks are a middle of the pack playoff team right now. Might be a little generous, but just go with that.

Which position/piece/player takes them to the next level.

For instance, I'm a fan of SGA. Find myself hoping that OKC decides to move on from his money after all. Probably not. But other than age, his he THAT much of an upgrade over Rose/Kemba? I mean, next level upgrade?

I know the Knicks have to solve PG long term
RJ is the homegrown draft pick, but he's not a star, not now, maybe never.
Fournier is good, but not dominant.
Mitch is very good defensively but a role player offensively.
There's even an argument for moving Randle for the right guys.

SGA? KAT? Booker? Ignoring that these players are under contract.
I'll pass on Beal.
Dame is a great player but he's 31, gets paid a ton, will cost even more.

I'm going to assume the upgrade happens at the wing and sends Fournier or RJ to 6th man status.


Firstoff Knicks may seemingly need to trade Burks. Old but playstyle isnt that vetty that rookies can learn from.
User avatar
BadNewsBarnes
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,664
And1: 2,572
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
       

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#383 » by BadNewsBarnes » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:23 pm

I'll chalk up the end of the game to the Knicks still not in shape. I thought Kemba in PG interview eluded to this.

Like many of you posted, Thibs will need to rethink the final 3 minutes of ball management and strategies...this hasn't worked up to now...
“Enjoy watching them on TV.” - James Dolan
"When a coach loses a team … that's when a coach is kind of done." - James Dolan
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 79,961
And1: 92,585
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#384 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:28 pm

Adelheid wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:Where is the path to upgrade the Knicks?

Which position should it happen at or which player?

Let's assume the Knicks are a middle of the pack playoff team right now. Might be a little generous, but just go with that.

Which position/piece/player takes them to the next level.

For instance, I'm a fan of SGA. Find myself hoping that OKC decides to move on from his money after all. Probably not. But other than age, his he THAT much of an upgrade over Rose/Kemba? I mean, next level upgrade?

I know the Knicks have to solve PG long term
RJ is the homegrown draft pick, but he's not a star, not now, maybe never.
Fournier is good, but not dominant.
Mitch is very good defensively but a role player offensively.
There's even an argument for moving Randle for the right guys.

SGA? KAT? Booker? Ignoring that these players are under contract.
I'll pass on Beal.
Dame is a great player but he's 31, gets paid a ton, will cost even more.

I'm going to assume the upgrade happens at the wing and sends Fournier or RJ to 6th man status.


Firstoff Knicks may seemingly need to trade Burks. Old but playstyle isnt that vetty that rookies can learn from.


Actually, I think guys like IQ, Grimes and RJ can learn a lot from Burks.

I don't think Burks is great; he's ok. Ok to good. He's uneven. But when he plays well, which is like 2 out of every 3 games, he plays the right way. He'll attack the basket a little, makes his shots, playmakes some. He's actually a useful NBA player.
That's why when the Knicks bundle him with Noel, they'll be able to move them. Because they aren't long term contracts, especially next year, and they don't suck.
Image
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 79,961
And1: 92,585
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#385 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:35 pm

I got to watch the game early AM. Ok, I only got to mid 3rd. I know Randle stinks it up at the end.

But let's appreciate that Randle is a PF making dribble passes and cross court passes out of the post to open shooters.

Randle adjusted his selfishness and "trying to do too much" from Fizzle to 1st year Thibs, and I think he's adjusting to the reality of how Fournier and Kemba play.

I mean, last year, Bullocks rarely cut, he spotted up for 3's, and Randle found him. We know Elf. And know you have Fournier who can operate in the P&R, but so can RJ, but so should Kemba, and Kemba should be taking and making shots Elf shouldn't and didn't last year.

Now that the Knicks have 3 shooters around Randle, but Randle is also a shooter himself, there are different ways they can play 4 out and in this Bulls game I'm starting to notice different wrinkles in the offense. Maybe I just happened to notice and it's been there all year. I mean besides that Kemba and Fournier add a dimension the Knicks lacked.

I think Randle has to adjust. This offense is already legitimately good. It's no fluke they can score. Once they get things sorted a bit, they are going to look REALLY good.
Image
snadler
Head Coach
Posts: 7,469
And1: 8,287
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#386 » by snadler » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:42 pm

In reality, the knicks season which is so hopeful and exciting, can be crushed if Mitch gets hurt which seems to happen every game. Mitch is the difference between the knicks being a borderline playoff team to a top 4 seed in the east.
ag3
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,818
And1: 2,496
Joined: Mar 27, 2012
       

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#387 » by ag3 » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:50 pm

god shammgod wrote:good win. but randle doesn't have it in him to be a 1st option at the end of games. we've seen it a bunch of times. some of you don't want to but we're gonna have to make a trade eventually.


Walker is capable of being the end of game guy.
User avatar
Separatista
RealGM
Posts: 11,787
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jan 30, 2014

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#388 » by Separatista » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:52 pm

I’m getting anxious for Mitch every game now. If we had any coach other than Thibs, Mitch might have rest days. But knowing him, unless the bone is sticking out, thibs will play you. Someone give mitch one of those forest gump leg braces. He’ll walk funny but that leg/feet will be straight for sure.
User avatar
Synciere
General Manager
Posts: 8,424
And1: 5,528
Joined: Jun 08, 2004
     

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#389 » by Synciere » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:57 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Where is the path to upgrade the Knicks?

Which position should it happen at or which player?

Let's assume the Knicks are a middle of the pack playoff team right now. Might be a little generous, but just go with that.

Which position/piece/player takes them to the next level.

For instance, I'm a fan of SGA. Find myself hoping that OKC decides to move on from his money after all. Probably not. But other than age, his he THAT much of an upgrade over Rose/Kemba? I mean, next level upgrade?

I know the Knicks have to solve PG long term
RJ is the homegrown draft pick, but he's not a star, not now, maybe never.
Fournier is good, but not dominant.
Mitch is very good defensively but a role player offensively.
There's even an argument for moving Randle for the right guys.

SGA? KAT? Booker? Ignoring that these players are under contract.
I'll pass on Beal.
Dame is a great player but he's 31, gets paid a ton, will cost even more.

I'm going to assume the upgrade happens at the wing and sends Fournier or RJ to 6th man status.


It's someone we haven't even thought of yet. Like Sabonis or someone.

Maybe Donovan Mitchell if Utah doesn't break through. But you have to think they offer him a super max as soon as he hits an all nba team and he won't want to leave money on the table.
User avatar
NewEra
RealGM
Posts: 16,073
And1: 13,732
Joined: Oct 11, 2007

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#390 » by NewEra » Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:58 pm

Mood

Image
BAF- 2020 Champs | 2021 2k Champs
Image

C- Myies Turner | Luke Kornet
PF- Giannis Antetokounmpo | Jarred Vando
SF- Draymond Green | Cam Thomas
SG- Cody Martin | Terry Rozier
PG- Trae Young | Jose Alvarado
Jimmit79
Head Coach
Posts: 7,439
And1: 5,251
Joined: Mar 22, 2016
     

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#391 » by Jimmit79 » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:01 pm

god shammgod wrote:good win. but randle doesn't have it in him to be a 1st option at the end of games. we've seen it a bunch of times. some of you don't want to but we're gonna have to make a trade eventually.
We are committed to him now tough and don't think he will give up #1 option to anyone else who comes here

Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,500
And1: 34,873
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#392 » by Fat Kat » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:04 pm

Read on Twitter
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®

Idiocracy was a prophecy
Nbabrothers
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 203
Joined: Sep 17, 2019
 

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#393 » by Nbabrothers » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:04 pm

I callled it in another post! The game would end with one team shooting at the buzzer for the win and missing! Right on point boy! Thank God it was the Knicks winning. Scary to know we were up 104-91 and won 104-103.
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,887
And1: 54,390
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#394 » by Deeeez Knicks » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:04 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:Where is the path to upgrade the Knicks?

Which position should it happen at or which player?

Let's assume the Knicks are a middle of the pack playoff team right now. Might be a little generous, but just go with that.

Which position/piece/player takes them to the next level.

For instance, I'm a fan of SGA. Find myself hoping that OKC decides to move on from his money after all. Probably not. But other than age, his he THAT much of an upgrade over Rose/Kemba? I mean, next level upgrade?

I know the Knicks have to solve PG long term
RJ is the homegrown draft pick, but he's not a star, not now, maybe never.
Fournier is good, but not dominant.
Mitch is very good defensively but a role player offensively.
There's even an argument for moving Randle for the right guys.

SGA? KAT? Booker? Ignoring that these players are under contract.
I'll pass on Beal.
Dame is a great player but he's 31, gets paid a ton, will cost even more.

I'm going to assume the upgrade happens at the wing and sends Fournier or RJ to 6th man status.


There's always some exceptions but in general its tough to win it all without a top 5, or maybe top 10 player. Those guys obviously come at a premium cost and are tough to get.

Ideal position? Our PG play has actually been really good with Kemba/Rose...at least compared to what we are used to. Its weird how that position has turned into a strength, at least not a weakness anymore. If we are looking at this from an ideal standpoint (and not realistic) I would say Lebron, Giannis, KD, Kawhi, Luka, etc. Obviously those guys are not available though.

If we are being more realistic then I dont know if we can be so picky about position. Basically look for any legit superstar that can be a #1 scorer and close out games.

In terms of options available maybe Lilliard is the closest top 10ish guy. Any Lilliard trade would bring a lot of questions that would need to be answered. What are we giving up? What does the team look like after the trade? How much time does Dame have left? It really depends

SGA would be great, but I am not buying that he's available for anything we could give up. Mitchell would be another great fit but he's locked up for the next 5 years or so.

Altogether, there may not be any realistic moves to put us over the top right now. I am cool with being patient and waiting for the right time. We def need that #1 guy. If we keep progressing like this, good things will happen though and we can wait for the right move.

This team has been pretty fun to watch so I am enjoying it. Its ok if we dont win it all this year
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Spree2Houston
Head Coach
Posts: 7,279
And1: 8,646
Joined: Feb 21, 2015
     

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#395 » by Spree2Houston » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:04 pm

Kampuchea wrote:Bulls lose but are their fans more happy about this game than ours due to the last couple of minutes? Don’t forget we were handling them pretty easily even with foolish turnovers all game.


They’re in denial man lol they want to still believe their team is legitimate
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,887
And1: 54,390
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#396 » by Deeeez Knicks » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:07 pm

NewEra wrote:Mood

Image


Image
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Nbabrothers
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 203
Joined: Sep 17, 2019
 

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#397 » by Nbabrothers » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:08 pm

Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter

I love the fact that Randle didn’t have to score over twenty points for us to get the win. He rebounded and passed great. He’s not a one dimensional player. I say up for MVP
User avatar
Strick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,985
And1: 9,069
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#398 » by Strick » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:11 pm

Are We Ther Yet wrote:I'm just glad to root for wins and get them. Haven't been able to focus on the games with the passing of my girlfriend almost 3 weeks ago. Tonight I saw some slop at the end bt they were clearly the better team. 4-1 and looking like a solid playoff contender so far. Plenty of games to play and fix any issues. On to the next one.

I’m so sorry to hear this, man. If you ever need someone to talk to or anything please don’t hesitate to reach out!
RGM Knicks BAF- Minnesota Timberwolves
Image

PG: Coby|Ivey|McCain
SG: B Miller|Monk|NSJ
SF: Jalen J|Klay|Bruce B
PF: Paolo|Jabari W
C: SenGOON|Cling Kong
Nbabrothers
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 203
Joined: Sep 17, 2019
 

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#399 » by Nbabrothers » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:11 pm

No one can stop RJ one on one! When he misses layups it’s not because of the defense, it’s more mental and it’s scary to know he’s only going to get better at it. The sky is the limit with our 21 year old
Milk
Rookie
Posts: 1,008
And1: 2,329
Joined: Sep 27, 2014
 

Re: PG: We survived 4-1 

Post#400 » by Milk » Fri Oct 29, 2021 1:11 pm

Read on Twitter

Return to New York Knicks