Seinfeld wrote:
No strawman whatsoever,
OK, then, let's go over the number of times that you misrepresent my comments. Just so you are clear on what I am saying, this is the definition of a strawman:
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.htmlNumber 1:
you are the one who keeps claiming that the Bulls' medical staff sucks, and is the cause of all of these injuries.
I didn't say that they caused all the injuries. They didn't cause Noah to step on someone's foot. They didn't pull Rip's hamstring, break Deng's leg,. etc. I said they handled a fairly large number of injuries wrong in comparison to other teams.
Number 2:
There's no "1000's", you keep specifically mentioning 3 or 4 examples, not 1000's.
I never said there were 1000's of injuries. I used a short analogy to cancer deaths to explain my position. Either you don't understand what an analogy is or you intentionally just misrepresented what I said.
Number 3:
And that it is disgusting that they cleared guys to play who soon re-injured themselves.p
"First Rip was cleared to play and immediately re-injured himself and missed a ton of time."- Same as Palomalu, but I haven't seen anyone complaining about the Steelers' staff.
"Then Rose hurt his back and was cleared to play, after hobbling around on the court for a few minutes, Thibodeau pulled him and he missed more time."- Is that the Nowitzki example, or the Howard example?
People want to whine and bitch about the Bulls' medical staff, and their "clearing of players". Lots of people claimed there are no other examples of teams clearing "unhealthy" players.
You replied to me, then quoted me twice, then you went on to use the word "people" and said something I have never said, which is that I said "there are no other examples of teams clearing "unhealthy" players". Either you are misrepresenting my argument or you just don't know what you are arguing against at this point.
So, just in one post, you had three misrepresentations of what I have said.
And to reply to this:
That's their right, and it's my right to show how much this crap happens in the real world. If people don't like the fact that it proves the Bulls' medical staff isn't a bunch of incompetent boobs, I can't help that. Maybe they should have done a little research, and paid attention to the other ~120 professional sports teams in the US and Canada, before they just wildly started claiming "the Bulls doctors are idiots"??????????????
Imagine getting some facts straight before you post something. What a crazy idea, eh?
Again going back and forth with the "people" and "you". I'm not sure who you are talking to. I'm not sure you know who you are talking to. Is it me or the board in general?
Beyond that, you pointed two 2 cases in 120 teams. That's a ratio of 60:1. The entire point of this discussion is that the Bulls, by themselves, had 3 or 4 issues of this in 1 year. Using YOUR examples that means that Chicago was up to 240 times as many issues as the average team. That's my point. When someone or something is that much of an outlier to a normal process, it makes you ask "why"? If you can come up with multiple examples of teams having 3 to 4 problems like this a year, then you have refuted my point and will have proven that the Bulls just had a relatively normal season.
You haven't yet though but you have done a fantastic job supporting my position (when actually represented accurately).
I thank you for your support.