TheSuzerain wrote:Just a terrible post. Dripping with nostalgia instead of reality.
The ultra-soft Pacers were better defensively than the Bad Boy Pistons.
The talent pool is bigger than ever thanks to foreign BBall exploding.
Analytics are changing the game.
Medical advances are extending primes and saving careers.
There is more talent in the league today than ever before.
Pistons team had Joe Dumars who defended the goat Michael Jordan pretty well, they had a young Dennis Rodman, they also had Rick Mahorn and John Salley who all defended the rim pretty well. I don't see how you can say this Pacers team who is ultra soft and didn't do anything except push Miami to 7 games ONLY because they are on of the few teams who have a legit 7ft player who knows how to properly play the game. And for the record, Hibbert would've been destroyed had he played vs any of these big men. Ewing, Zo Mourning, Dikembe were all better big men and would average probably 20-30 points per had they played in this weak era.
And another thing, todays big men get drafted without properly learning the game so they go to who..a 80's/90's big man (Olajuwon) to teach them how to play. Most of the point guards today don't have the PG skill set that the PG's of the 90's had, these guys get by on more athleticism than skill and I know your not gonna say the players are better overall shooters than back in the day? The only thing the players may have today is athletic ability, but skills, shooting, toughness, basketball I.Q, the big men were all better in the 80's and 90's.