If so I might have to give it a look..

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Han Solo wrote:ProSportsDaily??Worst mods of any board on the internetE
PockyCandy wrote:
Is this forum better than insidehoops?
Han Solo wrote:ThaRegul8r wrote:RayBan-Sematra wrote:But really why are we even talking about another forum here?
There is no need for that.
Agreed. There's no need to stoop to that level. I'm a member of other (non-basketball) forums which don't even allow talking about other forums to prevent forum wars.
Usually a forum is going to say it's better than another to begin with (what, someone's going to say, "No, the other board is better"?). All one has to do is spend time on a board and see for himself which one he prefers.
ProSportsDaily??Worst mods of any board on the internet.. Ban you for even saying another forum's name.. That place is LAME
I remember your posts from the RPOY project, you consistently brought it. Please continue to do so, sir. This board needs guys like you to counteract ... worthless posters
Retirement isn’t the end of the road, but just a turn in the road. – Unknown
Doctor MJ wrote:So speaking as mod here, I'm find with a thread like this popping up every now and again because the alternative is to look like we have some agenda here. The last time this came up we were in the middle of the Top 100 project, and while I forget the specific numbers I said something along these lines:
If you compare the same project on the 3 major basketball boards being discuss, what you saw is that the other two looked very similar but RealGM looked very different. RealGM had far more posts discussing every spot in the project to that point, and the average length of each post was considerably longer.
I'd say in a nutshell that's the difference specifically between RealGM's PC board and other boards alone the same lines: The discussion here is more studious. More academic, more well researched, etc.
That doesn't necessarily make it better though. It all depends on what you personally want. We get posters here sometimes complaining about the nerd-iness, and I just wonder why they choose to come here given that there are plenty of places to go where you don't have to deal with that.
2 other notes:
1. More generally, I get the impression that moderation is more strict around here than on other sites. Again, that might not be something you like.
2. By no means am I implying that RealGM has a monopoly on badass researchers and other basketball intellects on the internet. In my experience, every major site has folks like that. I think there's a more supportive culture of this here though, and I think that's why you tend to see the top posters from other sites dip their toes in on RealGM too even if they don't want to abandon the site they made their reputation with, whereas the opposite I'd say is less true.
PockyCandy wrote:1: Stans. Especially Jordan stans. I despise all stans though.
MrKnox wrote:Plenty of 15 year old homers here too. How else do you explain people putting KG in the top 10 or listing Nash as the greatest offensive weapon ever or ranking Dirk above Larry Bird or seriously comparing Kobe and Lebron to Jordan?
oaklandwarriors wrote:This place used to be pretty good but I feel like the And-1 system took a toll on post quality. It's still the best forum but not as good as it used to be.
MrKnox wrote:Porzingis wrote:RealGM, not close. ISH are bunch of 15 yr old homers.
Plenty of 15 year old homers here too. How else do you explain people putting KG in the top 10 or listing Nash as the greatest offensive weapon ever or ranking Dirk above Larry Bird or seriously comparing Kobe and Lebron to Jordan?
Rangure wrote:oaklandwarriors wrote:This place used to be pretty good but I feel like the And-1 system took a toll on post quality. It's still the best forum but not as good as it used to be.
Every site that implements a karma/likes system is bound to lose quality. People get too hung up posting **** one line puns because they are easily digested, ending up with many votes. It's fine if the thread was silly or humorous from the beginning, but other than that it just worsens the overall quality of the board. I wish they would get rid of this system, even though I like to vote, but I'd prefer improved quality of discussion.
giordunk wrote:I think the most intelligent basketball discussion happens on APBR forums. They have a couple of real analytics guys, and I met the admin of that site by chance. He's been watching NBA since the 50s, and he told me there are a few NBA analytic hires that used to be APBR members. But that forum is a little too square and this one is kind of fun. Just my thoughts. I think RealGM is the best balance of the more active basketball forums.