PG Thread (OKC) - National TV huh? Welp cya later!

SKG · Post #41 » by **SKG** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:32 am

brogdon have back problems already?
Always thought he looked much older, could he be 32-35?

Baddy Chuck · Post #42 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:33 am

ReasonablySober wrote:Didn't watch the majority of it, but I feel comfortable saying that coaching isn't the problem when you get beat by 30.

THE problem? Nah. A problem? Certainly.

greekbuck34 · Post #43 » by **greekbuck34** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:35 am

SKG wrote:brogdon have back problems already?
Always thought he looked much older, could he be 32-35?

Thon and Terry don't have any back problems at 40 though.

Post #44 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:35 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:Didn't watch the majority of it, but I feel comfortable saying that coaching isn't the problem when you get beat by 30.

THE problem? Nah. A problem? Certainly.

I mean, maybe? But when the players are as **** as they were tonight who cares?

SKG · Post #45 » by **SKG** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:36 am

greekbuck34 wrote:
SKG wrote:brogdon have back problems already?
Always thought he looked much older, could he be 32-35?

Thon and Terry don't have any back problems at 40 though.

Thon doesnt have a back
Terry is a jet

MrHoneycutt · Post #46 » by **MrHoneycutt** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:38 am

Yikes. Had to stop watching after the first, sadly seems like that was the way to go.

Baddy Chuck · Post #47 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:45 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:Didn't watch the majority of it, but I feel comfortable saying that coaching isn't the problem when you get beat by 30.

THE problem? Nah. A problem? Certainly.

I mean, maybe? But when the players are as **** as they were tonight who cares?

I know you're the king of "who cares" "doesn't matter" s but yeah, when it's consistently a problem whether our guys play well or not, yeah, it's a problem.

ampd · Post #48 » by **ampd** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:48 am

We seem to lay down and just get wrecked in our losses lately. Outside of the mavs, our last losses were by 31, 15, 25, and 20, and in those we were basically never in the game and like tonight it wasn't even as close as the 20 points.

That said we're 14-5 in our last 19, and while the defense has taken a nosedive again in the last 4 games, the jury is still out on which team this really is.

Post #49 » by **paulpressey25** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:53 am

This team has no center and has no PG. That's been the problem for two years now.

For the past month we've gotten passable to sometimes good PG play from Brogdon who also turns Monroe into a passable 25mpg big man.

No Brogdon, no dice.

trwi7 · Post #50 » by **trwi7** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:53 am

Never really listened to Sparky for any length of time because he's stupid and he's confirming that thought with his hard-on for Beasley.

Post #51 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:55 am

Baddy Chuck wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
Baddy Chuck wrote:THE problem? Nah. A problem? Certainly.

I mean, maybe? But when the players are as **** as they were tonight who cares?

I know you're the king of "who cares" "doesn't matter" s but yeah, when it's consistently a problem whether our guys play well or not, yeah, it's a problem.

A couple nights ago they beat Boston in Boston on the 2nd night of a back to back and they had the league's best record last months.

**** happens.

Post #52 » by **paulpressey25** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 3:58 am

trwi7 wrote:Never really listened to Sparky for any length of time because he's stupid and he's confirming that thought with his hard-on for Beasley.

Like Sparky, respect Sparky, all the usual disclaimers.

But yeah, going on and on about how Kidd has to give Beasley big minutes and tell him to "take over" is not a good take.

Baddy Chuck · Post #53 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:00 am

ReasonablySober wrote:A couple nights ago they beat Boston in Boston on the 2nd night of a back to back and they had the league's best record last months.

**** happens.

And weeks before that you were calling us one of the 5 worst teams in the league.

**** sure does happen. A lot of the same, repeated ****. A lot of that **** dealing with Kidd's coaching.

sdn40 · Post #54 » by **sdn40** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:03 am

trwi7 wrote:Never really listened to Sparky for any length of time because he's stupid and he's confirming that thought with his hard-on for Beasley.

Well Giannis was -24, Middleton was -17, Thon was -12, Snell was -19, Delly was -15 and Beasley was -9. We know what that has to mean.

Actually, like it or not, Beasley was the only guy that didn't look overwhelmed.

DrWood · Post #55 » by **DrWood** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:05 am

I think maybe Brogdon is a kinda important.

dedned · Post #56 » by **dedned** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:06 am

Ron Swanson wrote:Middleton's been low-key trash for the better part of two and a half weeks now. When Giannis doesn't have a reliable 2nd option, you're gonna have a bad time.

Middleton has always been streaky.

BenLaw · Post #57 » by **BenLaw** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:06 am

paulpressey25 wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Never really listened to Sparky for any length of time because he's stupid and he's confirming that thought with his hard-on for Beasley.

Like Sparky, respect Sparky, all the usual disclaimers.

But yeah, going on and on about how Kidd has to give Beasley big minutes and tell him to "take over" is not a good take.

Yeah. It's such an awful, awful idea to give the ball to a player who can actually create his own shot and shoots over 54 percent... CRAZY!

Prickle · Post #58 » by **Prickle** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:15 am

There was not a single bright spot in tonight's game. Not a single Buck's player did anything right. Couldn't shoot, couldn't pass, couldn't defend, couldn't rebound, couldn't even f*cking dribble. Once again, Kidd didn't help, but he could've coached the game of his life and it wouldn't have mattered. Even Popovich couldn't have gotten the Bucks to within 25 tonight. Of course, the only guy who looked like he could've provided the spark offensively (Beasley) wasn't afforded sufficient playing time to do so. And then he ended up re-injuring his knee, fittingly. Lol.

These are still the Bucks, after all. Besides that slip up in 2001, they've done a pretty bang up job of never allowing their fan base to get too excited.

Post #59 » by **paulpressey25** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:18 am

Prickle wrote:There was not a single bright spot in tonight's game. Not a single Buck's player did anything right. Couldn't shoot, couldn't pass, couldn't defend, couldn't rebound, couldn't even f*cking dribble. Once again, Kidd didn't help, but he could've coached the game of his life and it wouldn't have mattered. Even Popovich couldn't have gotten the Bucks to within 25 tonight. Of course, the only guy who looked like he could've provided the spark offensively (Beasley) wasn't afforded sufficient playing time to do so. And then he ended up re-injuring his knee, fittingly. Lol.

These are still the Bucks, after all. Besides that slip up in 2001, they've done a pretty bang up job of never allowing their fan base to get too excited.

Really felt like they might punch through that magic "42-win" barrier for only the second time in 26 years. But now would take a split just to hit 42 wins.

Mags FTW · Post #60 » by **Mags FTW** » Wed Apr 5, 2017 4:21 am

Ron Swanson wrote:Middleton's been low-key trash for the better part of two and a half weeks now. When Giannis doesn't have a reliable 2nd option, you're gonna have a bad time.

Yup...

viewtopic.php?p=53902165#p53902165