Luguentz Dort

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#41 » by doordoor123 » Tue Mar 5, 2019 4:47 am

youngWizzy wrote:
clyde21 wrote:where is everyone on Dort now? great game tonight, and has now hit 40% from 3 in his last 6 games.

still don't know where I land on him tbh. insanely inconsistent, but goes thru stretches where he's an absolute menace attacking the rim and on defense.


A worse shooting Josh Okogie.

Physical standpoint: Okogie (6-4 207) vs Dort (6-4 215)

Stats:
    PTS TRB AST FG% FG3% FT%
    Okogie 16.9 5.8 2.0 43.7 38.2 77.7
    Dort 16.2 4.4 2.4 40.4 30.6 68.6


I wasn’t a big fan of Okogie, still not really, but I don’t really see the comparison in the way they play. Dort loves contact while Okogie didn’t. Dort is also a better defender with more advanced moves and a thicker body. He’s closer to a more advanced at a younger age David Nwaba for me.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,136
And1: 70,284
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#42 » by clyde21 » Tue Mar 5, 2019 5:03 am

he's like Rawle Alkins from last year, but better. high end potential is probably somewhere around Victor Oladipo if everything goes right for him.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,136
And1: 70,284
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#43 » by clyde21 » Thu Sep 3, 2020 4:24 am

bump...thoughts now? legit or no?
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#44 » by Stillwater » Thu Sep 3, 2020 5:02 am

Had him going 37th to Dallas in my final mock. Definitely was surprised he went udfa.
Definitely as nba ready physically as they come.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
MemphisX
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,829
And1: 3,751
Joined: Nov 10, 2011

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#45 » by MemphisX » Thu Sep 3, 2020 6:16 am

So many on this board liked him to varying degrees. Must have had some terrible interviews.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#46 » by nolang1 » Thu Sep 3, 2020 8:02 am

MemphisX wrote:So many on this board liked him to varying degrees. Must have had some terrible interviews.


It's not uncommon for players/agents to prefer going undrafted and having a choice of teams once they fall past a certain point where the guaranteed money isn't that huge. Terence Davis did this as well, and Bol Bol was trying to but the Nuggets gambled on him sight unseen.
King Ken
General Manager
Posts: 9,833
And1: 5,511
Joined: Jul 01, 2014
   

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#47 » by King Ken » Thu Sep 3, 2020 1:38 pm

nolang1 wrote:
MemphisX wrote:So many on this board liked him to varying degrees. Must have had some terrible interviews.


It's not uncommon for players/agents to prefer going undrafted and having a choice of teams once they fall past a certain point where the guaranteed money isn't that huge. Terence Davis did this as well, and Bol Bol was trying to but the Nuggets gambled on him sight unseen.

Dort and a number of these guys wanted guaranteed money even if they were seen as locks to be drafted. I wasn't high on him at all and didn't realize he was so damn good defensively but OKC is the perfect team for a player like him.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#48 » by Ruzious » Thu Sep 3, 2020 1:47 pm

clyde21 wrote:bump...thoughts now? legit or no?

I'll be honest - I don't see him as being all that intriguing. He's physically somewhat similar to Smart, but he's got an awfully long way to go to be that kind of player. Very good game last night, but that was primarily because he was an afterthought for the defense. Nice touch on his shot, but his form looks unworkable to me in the long run, and I don't see much skill in his game.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#49 » by doordoor123 » Thu Sep 3, 2020 1:49 pm

I still see Lance Stephenson
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,496
And1: 10,045
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#50 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Sep 3, 2020 2:21 pm

I still see Lance Stephenson


Lance was a better ballhandler, good enough to be a 2nd unit facilitator. and slightly above average defender I think Dort is going to be a better shooting Tony Allen. He plays with a fire and motor that isnt going to be an anomaly. This kid is a pitbull, the type any good team should want.

Allen finished his career with a DBPM of 1.9, just tremendous for a guard. Lance was 0.5, not bad but not a defensive stopper by any means. I think Dort is on that Tony Allen path, but with a passable 3PT shot (Allen's never averaged over 0.2 3PTM per game in a 13 year career, clearly a liability) . He is unquestionably one of the most exciting guys I have watched play in a long time.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,246
And1: 2,807
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#51 » by pcbothwel » Thu Sep 3, 2020 2:25 pm

Ruzious wrote:
clyde21 wrote:bump...thoughts now? legit or no?

I'll be honest - I don't see him as being all that intriguing. He's physically somewhat similar to Smart, but he's got an awfully long way to go to be that kind of player. Very good game last night, but that was primarily because he was an afterthought for the defense. Nice touch on his shot, but his form looks unworkable to me in the long run, and I don't see much skill in his game.


This... He appears to be a decent/above average defender, but... he cant score/shoot efficiently at all, he doesnt rebound, he doesnt pass/create, and his usage is under 15%....
Someone explain to me how this guy is worth even a discussion.
Lance Stephenson seems like a good comp, but Lance was a much better ball handler, creator, and rebounder.
I see Avery Bradley... mediocre defender that gets overrated and doesnt do anything else on the court particularly well.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#52 » by doordoor123 » Thu Sep 3, 2020 3:09 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
I still see Lance Stephenson


Lance was a better ballhandler, good enough to be a 2nd unit facilitator. and slightly above average defender I think Dort is going to be a better shooting Tony Allen. He plays with a fire and motor that isnt going to be an anomaly. This kid is a pitbull, the type any good team should want.

Allen finished his career with a DBPM of 1.9, just tremendous for a guard. Lance was 0.5, not bad but not a defensive stopper by any means. I think Dort is on that Tony Allen path, but with a passable 3PT shot (Allen's never averaged over 0.2 3PTM per game in a 13 year career, clearly a liability) . He is unquestionably one of the most exciting guys I have watched play in a long time.


Dort had some good handling moves in college. He just doesn’t have the confidence yet. That isn’t his role. And it was the same for Stephenson when he entered the league.
User avatar
ThunderBolt
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,368
And1: 19,234
Joined: Dec 29, 2016
Location: Lynnwood, WA
   

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#53 » by ThunderBolt » Thu Sep 3, 2020 5:25 pm

pcbothwel wrote:Someone explain to me how this guy is worth even a discussion.

Gee, i dont know. Maybe because players don’t peak at 21.
bisme37 wrote:If there were magnets in basketballs so strong they changed the path of the ball as it flew through the air, wouldn't the ball then stick magnetically to the rim when it got there?
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,246
And1: 2,807
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#54 » by pcbothwel » Thu Sep 3, 2020 5:42 pm

ThunderBolt wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:Someone explain to me how this guy is worth even a discussion.

Gee, i dont know. Maybe because players don’t peak at 21.


Umm...yeah...Im aware.
My question is... why is a mediocre prospect with average skills and subpar awareness, that was subpar in college as an older Freshman, went undrafted, and had a bad Rookie year being treated as "Missed Opportunity" prospect that NBA GM's just missed on?

Is it because he had a hot 6 game playoffs with a TS of 45%, more than twice as many turnovers as assist, and fouled 3 times as much as accrued STOCKS (Blocks + Steals)?

Please... explain.
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#55 » by Stillwater » Thu Sep 3, 2020 5:49 pm

pcbothwel wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:Someone explain to me how this guy is worth even a discussion.

Gee, i dont know. Maybe because players don’t peak at 21.


Umm...yeah...Im aware.
My question is... why is a mediocre prospect with average skills and subpar awareness, that was subpar in college as an older Freshman, went undrafted, and had a bad Rookie year being treated as "Missed Opportunity" prospect that NBA GM's just missed on?

Is it because he had a hot 6 game playoffs with a TS of 45%, more than twice as many turnovers as assist, and fouled 3 times as much as accrued STOCKS (Blocks + Steals)?

Please... explain.

I think the attn is because he cause a league MVP candidate to lay a terd
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 15,050
And1: 4,248
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#56 » by EvanZ » Thu Sep 3, 2020 6:23 pm

clyde21 wrote:bump...thoughts now? legit or no?


He's a legit defender. He clearly needs to keep working on the shot. In a re-draft my guess is he goes around 30 now.
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#57 » by nolang1 » Thu Sep 3, 2020 8:10 pm

Stillwater wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:Gee, i dont know. Maybe because players don’t peak at 21.


Umm...yeah...Im aware.
My question is... why is a mediocre prospect with average skills and subpar awareness, that was subpar in college as an older Freshman, went undrafted, and had a bad Rookie year being treated as "Missed Opportunity" prospect that NBA GM's just missed on?

Is it because he had a hot 6 game playoffs with a TS of 45%, more than twice as many turnovers as assist, and fouled 3 times as much as accrued STOCKS (Blocks + Steals)?

Please... explain.

I think the attn is because he cause a league MVP candidate to lay a terd


Except if you look at Harden’s playoff stats he’s more efficient than he’s been in the last few playoffs, so while you can say he’s better than the average rookie at perimeter defense and can get better, he doesn’t have some unique Harden-stopping ability.

I had him around 25th last year and didn’t see anything this season that would make me move him up. It’s still the same story where his shot and overall feel of the game are a long way from making him a less of a liability on offense than a positive on defense. Even this game 7 three-point barrage only brought him to 26% on the series and was the result of a strategy that clearly limited his teammates, who had to essentially play 4 on 5 when they had the ball.
BostonCouchGM
Head Coach
Posts: 6,714
And1: 4,859
Joined: Jun 07, 2018

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#58 » by BostonCouchGM » Thu Sep 3, 2020 10:10 pm

Being an afterthought, he was wide open many times and for one game got hot from three. He's what I thought he'd be, a try hard type every team should have coming off their bench or starting due to injuries. He's going to have a long career. He reminds me of PJ Tucker. I was shocked he didn't get drafted. Goes to show you how many inept front offices there are.
User avatar
EvanZ
RealGM
Posts: 15,050
And1: 4,248
Joined: Apr 06, 2011

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#59 » by EvanZ » Fri Sep 4, 2020 12:18 am

BostonCouchGM wrote:Being an afterthought, he was wide open many times and for one game got hot from three. He's what I thought he'd be, a try hard type every team should have coming off their bench or starting due to injuries. He's going to have a long career. He reminds me of PJ Tucker. I was shocked he didn't get drafted. Goes to show you how many inept front offices there are.


Dort’s agent, Chris Emens of Octagon, said entering Thursday two teams with late first-round picks and six with picks in the 30s had strong interest in Dort. In addition, he said they turned down four teams wanting to draft Dort in the mid-to-late second round because they either wanted to draft and stash him overseas or draft him and send him directly to the developmental G League.


As painful as it was, they decided that going undrafted and signing a full two-way contract — which means Dort will split time in the NBA (up to 45 days per season) and G League — was the best option, especially considering Oklahoma City’s reputation for player development.


https://theathletic.com/1040676/2019/06/21/head-scratching-how-did-asus-luguentz-dort-go-undrafted-thursday-night/
nolang1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,959
And1: 1,757
Joined: Aug 03, 2012

Re: Luguentz Dort 

Post#60 » by nolang1 » Fri Sep 4, 2020 12:45 am

EvanZ wrote:
BostonCouchGM wrote:Being an afterthought, he was wide open many times and for one game got hot from three. He's what I thought he'd be, a try hard type every team should have coming off their bench or starting due to injuries. He's going to have a long career. He reminds me of PJ Tucker. I was shocked he didn't get drafted. Goes to show you how many inept front offices there are.


Dort’s agent, Chris Emens of Octagon, said entering Thursday two teams with late first-round picks and six with picks in the 30s had strong interest in Dort. In addition, he said they turned down four teams wanting to draft Dort in the mid-to-late second round because they either wanted to draft and stash him overseas or draft him and send him directly to the developmental G League.


As painful as it was, they decided that going undrafted and signing a full two-way contract — which means Dort will split time in the NBA (up to 45 days per season) and G League — was the best option, especially considering Oklahoma City’s reputation for player development.


https://theathletic.com/1040676/2019/06/21/head-scratching-how-did-asus-luguentz-dort-go-undrafted-thursday-night/


nolang1 wrote:
MemphisX wrote:So many on this board liked him to varying degrees. Must have had some terrible interviews.


It's not uncommon for players/agents to prefer going undrafted and having a choice of teams once they fall past a certain point where the guaranteed money isn't that huge. Terence Davis did this as well, and Bol Bol was trying to but the Nuggets gambled on him sight unseen.


I hope people get a better understanding of this kind of stuff or else there’s going to be this exhausting “how did this guy go undrafted?!” kind of talk every single year.

The fact of the matter is the overall talent level is higher than ever before and there are many players in the G league or overseas who are more
or less capable of filling some minor role on an NBA team. Once you get out of the consensus top 20 or so in a draft, you’re looking mostly at borderline NBA players and the situation makes more of a difference.

Return to NBA Draft