djsunyc wrote:this dude is gonna be partying too much in LA.
That would be the main concern. He admitted he was "too lit for NY" and he ain't getting younger.
Moderators: infinite11285, Domejandro, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77, cupcakesnake
djsunyc wrote:this dude is gonna be partying too much in LA.
Capn'O wrote:djsunyc wrote:this dude is gonna be partying too much in LA.
That would be the main concern. He admitted he was "too lit for NY" and he ain't getting younger.
Yogatti wrote:GeorgeMarcus wrote:
We’ve come this far, so let me help you out.
“73 don’t mean ****” = regular season doesn’t matter
Now refer back to my previous statement: “Like I said, at worst you put 0 stock in the regular season, in which case ‘16 Curry is just like every other star that lost in the Finals. Idk how else to demonstrate that to you.”
We’re getting close. I believe in you
that's not the point of what he said. I see you have terrible reading comprehension, that's why I have to explain something so simple to you.
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:ImSlower wrote:If he is engaged with the system, he will be a great emotional leader, especially come playoffs. I'm happy if he signs with the Clips, I was not excited for him on the Lakers. Most Bulls fans will always love the guy.
If he can give 10-15 minutes a game of high energy and defensive effort+a few hard fouls, I'm happy. I realize that his impact on defense is way less than it used to be, but last year he showed some great flashes. He was a +1.5 RPM overall and +7 Net Rating on the season, so obviously he can still impact the game. One lowkey skillset the Clippers could really use from him is playmaking. He's an outstanding passer for a big and having him in a poor man's Marc Gasol type role (albeit in way less minutes) would be huge. He could basically run plays in a spot role from the post and just focus on protecting the rim. I'd most be excited about his IQ+experience+mentality to fit this team of scrappy junkyard dogs.
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:TheNewEra wrote:I can’t see him accepting not playing every game after the Knicks situation. Only way he will get consistent playing time is if Harrell and his jumper are improved enough that he can be the primary backup at PF. With Noah’s passing ability he won’t be forced to stay in the paint and clog it in case of Lou and Harrell pick and roll.
Beverly/Lou/Mann
George/Shamet/Robinson
Leonard/Harkless/McGruder/Coffey
Green/Harrell/Patterson/Motley
Zubac/Noah/Kabengele
The team should of never signed Patterson. Even more head scratching now. I'm pretty sure after Noah we would be at max roster spots and if they pursued 1 more like Iggy, they would need to cut someone (unless they trade for him).
GeorgeMarcus wrote:Wooo boy, you just keep digging yourself a bigger hole. I should have nipped this in the bud a while ago but self restraint isn’t my best quality. What do YOU believe he was insinuating with that comment? I want to hear you spell it out.
Yogatti wrote:GeorgeMarcus wrote:Wooo boy, you just keep digging yourself a bigger hole. I should have nipped this in the bud a while ago but self restraint isn’t my best quality. What do YOU believe he was insinuating with that comment? I want to hear you spell it out.
I really question your IQ if you really need to have that quote explained to you. I also explained that multiple times in that thread. Work on your reading comprehension and stop wasting everybody's time.
GeorgeMarcus wrote:Just as I suspected, you know you’re wrong and have too much pride to admit it. And you have the audacity to question my IQ lol
A simple poll would reveal that nobody agrees with you but luckily for you I’m not THAT petty. I’m like a 6/10 petty.
Yogatti wrote:GeorgeMarcus wrote:Just as I suspected, you know you’re wrong and have too much pride to admit it. And you have the audacity to question my IQ lol
A simple poll would reveal that nobody agrees with you but luckily for you I’m not THAT petty. I’m like a 6/10 petty.
I'm not wrong on anything in this thread. You're not even debating with me. You're acting like a (Please Use More Appropriate Word) not knowing what a simple quote means. I posted quotes from Jordan, Pippen and Joe Lacob that all agreed with all the points I made but you're too stupid to understand any of it.
You have absolutely nothing to say at this point. You're just embarrassing yourself. You just want that last reply in this thread just to save face. You're pathetic to be honest
GeorgeMarcus wrote:[
*takes a bow* Drive safe everyone you’ve been a great audience
Yogatti wrote:LipSkinMatter wrote:Yogatti wrote:
What does that have anything to do with my post? All I stated was Curry needed another MVP on his team after winning 73 win games. I didn't say Curry wasn't the reason for their 73 win season
"Needed"
^ There is the lie
How is that a lie?
Capn'O wrote:djsunyc wrote:this dude is gonna be partying too much in LA.
That would be the main concern. He admitted he was "too lit for NY" and he ain't getting younger.
Capn'O wrote:djsunyc wrote:this dude is gonna be partying too much in LA.
That would be the main concern. He admitted he was "too lit for NY" and he ain't getting younger.
Forte IV wrote:Capn'O wrote:djsunyc wrote:this dude is gonna be partying too much in LA.
That would be the main concern. He admitted he was "too lit for NY" and he ain't getting younger.
Eh Lou Will goes out all the time. In fact the team really goes out all the time, Lou and Pat keep them in check.
Capn'O wrote:Forte IV wrote:Capn'O wrote:
That would be the main concern. He admitted he was "too lit for NY" and he ain't getting younger.
Eh Lou Will goes out all the time. In fact the team really goes out all the time, Lou and Pat keep them in check.
They can't keep Noah in check.
He will have to exert some self control for it to work. I'm telling you, he was off the rails in NY.
LastNameEver wrote:This is the worst dialogue ive ever seen on RGM.
How do mods allow 2 users to derail a thread with completely unrelated convo for multiple pages ?