How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,840
And1: 12,708
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#41 » by Lockdown504090 » Fri Nov 5, 2021 5:45 am

GSWFan1994 wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:injuries really derailed him, sucks. he is a great guy as well. I dm'd him to ask a question about his shot and he just answered me and had a whole convo like a regular person.


That seems like a really cool story. Would you kindly tell us more about it?

I asked if anyone ever tried to change his shot in the nba and he said no, because he has great form and it shocked me he replied and that he thought he had great form. then i asked why he could shoot the 3 and demar cant and he basically said because demar takes it further and releases the ball later taking the power out. sure enough, he was spot on. redd released the ball as his feet left the floor to shoot and demar holds it a split second longer. I coach as well so i guess he wanted to help me out.
User avatar
Ito
General Manager
Posts: 9,535
And1: 988
Joined: Apr 13, 2002
Location: UPTOWN, NY

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#42 » by Ito » Fri Nov 5, 2021 7:03 am

Michael Redd not on Ray Allen’s level.. he’s more like maybe a Mobley or Middleton at best but not Allen..
Image
Golden Knight
Analyst
Posts: 3,329
And1: 4,965
Joined: Feb 27, 2017
   

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#43 » by Golden Knight » Fri Nov 5, 2021 10:19 am

I usually like shooters but Redd's game was too boring for me. Hated his shot release too.

Ray was not only the better all-around player he was also on another level as a shooter. Better percentages on nearly 3x the 3P attempts and nearly double the FT attempts.

Ray - 40% 3P and 89.4% FT
Redd - 38% 3P and 83.8% FT
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,722
And1: 9,242
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#44 » by JN61 » Fri Nov 5, 2021 10:29 am

Ray Allen saved Lebron's legacy.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
User avatar
GSWFan1994
General Manager
Posts: 8,049
And1: 16,684
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
 

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#45 » by GSWFan1994 » Fri Nov 5, 2021 1:20 pm

Lockdown504090 wrote:I asked if anyone ever tried to change his shot in the nba and he said no, because he has great form and it shocked me he replied and that he thought he had great form. then i asked why he could shoot the 3 and demar cant and he basically said because demar takes it further and releases the ball later taking the power out. sure enough, he was spot on. redd released the ball as his feet left the floor to shoot and demar holds it a split second longer. I coach as well so i guess he wanted to help me out.


Thanks for the reply, much appreciated. And good luck on your coaching job.

Cheers!
User avatar
Uncle Mxy
General Manager
Posts: 9,533
And1: 2,269
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Location: I plead the Fifth Dimension

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#46 » by Uncle Mxy » Fri Nov 5, 2021 1:54 pm

Why do people talk about Jesus more than one of his followers? Hmm...
Image
Danny1616
General Manager
Posts: 9,690
And1: 12,725
Joined: May 26, 2007

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#47 » by Danny1616 » Fri Nov 5, 2021 1:55 pm

Michael Redd had a short prime riddled with injuries while Allen was consistently a great player for like almost 20 seasons.
durka
Starter
Posts: 2,399
And1: 1,031
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#48 » by durka » Fri Nov 5, 2021 2:42 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
durka wrote:
oversteerdawg wrote:Same reason people talk about Kevin Garnett and not Chris Bosh.

I get the point youre trying to make here, but no need to disrespect Bosh like that.

Bosh just got inducted into the HoF and was a key part of one the most historically significant teams, Redd isn't even close to that level. Ray and KG are definitely a level above Bosh, but CB is probably 2 levels above Redd.


KG's on a completely other level than Ray too...KG is to Bosh as Ray is to Redd is completely fair. The first statement is easier for people to get because they understand a top at worst 15 guy in KG and a barely top 100 guy in bosh.

The difference between a top 20 and a top 50 player definitely isn't the same as the difference between an 11 time allstar who won 2 rings and a guy who made the allstar team once during a period of time when the eastern conference wasn't very good. David West would be a closer KG comparable IMO.

It feels like a lot of people here are forgetting that Ray Allen was really good on the Bucks and Sonics before going to the C's. It also feels like Redd is being WAY overrated here. He couldn't stay healthy and when he was, I'd still take peak Ray over him. If we want to compare a guy from that era who had a short prime, Brandon Roy would be way closer. Redd's game might have been closer to Allens stylistically, but in terms of level of player I think Roy was way closer. If you put Redd on a team with actual good players I don't think his stats would have looked close to as good as they did on a perpetually bad Bucks team, whereas Roy was leading the Blazers to the playoffs every year and putting up big numbers.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,242
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#49 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Nov 5, 2021 2:58 pm

durka wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
durka wrote:I get the point youre trying to make here, but no need to disrespect Bosh like that.

Bosh just got inducted into the HoF and was a key part of one the most historically significant teams, Redd isn't even close to that level. Ray and KG are definitely a level above Bosh, but CB is probably 2 levels above Redd.


KG's on a completely other level than Ray too...KG is to Bosh as Ray is to Redd is completely fair. The first statement is easier for people to get because they understand a top at worst 15 guy in KG and a barely top 100 guy in bosh.

The difference between a top 20 and a top 50 player definitely isn't the same as the difference between an 11 time allstar who won 2 rings and a guy who made the allstar team once during a period of time when the eastern conference wasn't very good. David West would be a closer KG comparable IMO.

It feels like a lot of people here are forgetting that Ray Allen was really good on the Bucks and Sonics before going to the C's. It also feels like Redd is being WAY overrated here. He couldn't stay healthy and when he was, I'd still take peak Ray over him. If we want to compare a guy from that era who had a short prime, Brandon Roy would be way closer. Redd's game might have been closer to Allens stylistically, but in terms of level of player I think Roy was way closer. If you put Redd on a team with actual good players I don't think his stats would have looked close to as good as they did on a perpetually bad Bucks team, whereas Roy was leading the Blazers to the playoffs every year and putting up big numbers.


Bosh isn't remotely close to as good as the 11x allstar apperances sounds and Redd was WAY better than 1x all star sounds. I assume we are evaluating these guys as players, not the stupid allstar game where the players are selected before the season even ends.

While I think OP is underrating Ray Allen, nobody else here seems to be doing that.

The last player comparison forum top 100 ranked KG at 11 and Bosh at 86. 77 spots apart. Allen was ranked 50th. I think it's fair to agree that the gap between 11th all time and 86th is FAR FAR bigger than the gap between 50th and say 127th. There are way more players who you'd cluster into say 100-150 in a much more interchangeable way and by then allstar appearances are not even a factor.

Now to how good Redd was, I think you're underrating him more than the OP is underrating Ray Allen. From 03-08 Redd missed 48 games total over 6 seasons. During that time he had a BPM of 2.6, VORP of 18.6, PER of 20.2, and a WS of 46.7. That' s legit 6 year run of low level but still allstar level production, being awarded to a team or not being inconsequential. He was a really good player and I think if you did a top 150 all time players list, you'd be very much looking at him for the last 10 or so spots. Which makes the analogy pretty reasonable. That is unless you think Bosh was anywhere closer to as good as Ray Allen and then...I can't help you there. WE just disagree on Bosh and that's for another time and another thread.
NirvanaFC
Veteran
Posts: 2,520
And1: 2,600
Joined: Mar 26, 2010

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#50 » by NirvanaFC » Fri Nov 5, 2021 4:16 pm

Golden Knight wrote:I usually like shooters but Redd's game was too boring for me. Hated his shot release too.

Ray was not only the better all-around player he was also on another level as a shooter. Better percentages on nearly 3x the 3P attempts and nearly double the FT attempts.

Ray - 40% 3P and 89.4% FT
Redd - 38% 3P and 83.8% FT

Am I the only one who likes his lefty sling shots?
jokeboy86
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 7,321
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: How come people talk about Ray Allen but not Michael Redd? 

Post#51 » by jokeboy86 » Fri Nov 5, 2021 5:11 pm

This thread shows how many people actually watched Redd play in his prime.

Return to The General Board