ImageImage

Sessions Update:Ramon signs T-Wolves OS (page 310 update)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

BucksRUS
Analyst
Posts: 3,159
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 16, 2009
Location: In the Snow.

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4181 » by BucksRUS » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:35 pm

msiris wrote:
I am sorry, but SL is nothing compared to the real deal.


For Jennings that is all we have. When the season starts Jennings can show us how good he is.

Just comparing last year's JA summer league appearances where he looked lost to Jennings' SL appearances where he actually showed some basketball talent. JA carried his looking lost from SL through the season last year.
Trade S. Jackson soon. NJ seems like a nice place for him.
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 11,048
And1: 2,300
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4182 » by msiris » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:41 pm

BucksRUS wrote:
msiris wrote:
I am sorry, but SL is nothing compared to the real deal.


For Jennings that is all we have. When the season starts Jennings can show us how good he is.

Just comparing last year's JA summer league appearances where he looked lost to Jennings' SL appearances where he actually showed some basketball talent. JA carried his looking lost from SL through the season last year.
I know he showed real promise, but being a Bucks fans since the coin toss I have seen a lot of players come and go. Thats why I wait until the real season is half over before I claim anything. :D
Ride the tank
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4183 » by worthlessBucks » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:59 pm

msiris wrote:I am sorry, but SL is nothing compared to the real deal.

I'm sure there's a box score out there with David Harrison owning Bogut during a regular season game.
Go Bucks!
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,414
And1: 28,046
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4184 » by trwi7 » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:05 pm

Harrison definitely has owned us before. :(

I don't recall this game, but it certainly looks like it was one of Bogut's "quit games."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=260215011
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
GrandAdmiralDan
RealGM
Posts: 15,165
And1: 1,457
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
Contact:
     

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4185 » by GrandAdmiralDan » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:32 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:
LukePliska wrote:How many rookies are dealt during the middle of their first season?

Jennings being moved is about as unrealistic as it comes.


Agreed. It is rare.

But Drew Gooden was dealt. And he was #4 overall IIRC.

And of course we've got the infamous Potsie/Sessions for Conley/pick trade that did not go through, but that somewhat supports your point.

Agree with BucksRUS last few posts.


And don't forget that Hammond tried to dump Ridnour with Alexander to New Jersey for expirings.
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4186 » by worthlessBucks » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:32 pm

trwi7 wrote:Harrison definitely has owned us before. :(

I don't recall this game, but it certainly looks like it was one of Bogut's "quit games."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=260215011

Thanks for doing the grunt work. I knew Harrison had done it when it counts against Bogut because I recall the 'simply summer league' argument being brought up at the time. February 15, 2006, Christ I need a life if I remember random discussion from that time.
Go Bucks!
BucksRUS
Analyst
Posts: 3,159
And1: 12
Joined: Jun 16, 2009
Location: In the Snow.

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4187 » by BucksRUS » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:41 pm

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:
And don't forget that Hammond tried to dump Ridnour with Alexander to New Jersey for expirings.


Do you think the rest of the league has caught on to how bad JA is now? If he doesn't show anything this year, do they even pick up his option for next year?
Trade S. Jackson soon. NJ seems like a nice place for him.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4188 » by thomchatt3rton » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:46 pm

i agree that jennings being moved this season is unlikely, but i do think its possible. what if we keep sessions- are we then going to have a sessions/jennings backcourt for the next couple of years? are they going to compete for playing time? what if we keep sessions, he has an absolutely amazing first half, and jennings shows promise but is kept on the bench by skiles for turn-overs or other rookie mistakes, and somebody offers us something awesome for brandon? something like a very good PF and/or draft picks in 2010 and/or eating gadz's contract and/or a huge expiring contract? etc etc
we'd have sessions already under contract (probably for a price that would be much higher any other year) he already has logged time with skiles and the team. Or say jennings and skiles rub each other the wrong way and brandon starts to dog it?
I wouldn't rule it out.
Wasn't it (and i dont remember for sure) hammond who used the term "roster flexibilty"? Isn't this kind of what he means (as we semi-rebuild)?
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4189 » by thomchatt3rton » Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:47 pm

DannoMac20 wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:
Nebula1 wrote:I'm not denying that, but it's a nice option to have. If Sessions continues his growth %, then the Bucks may want to trade Jennings down the line. It's possible, as is trading Sessions if Jennings becomes a supernova. Either way, it's an option I'd like to see the Bucks keep.

Personally, I want to see what they can do together. Both can get steals at a high rate and run transition. I'd like to see the press run with them both on the floor as I've already stated before.


bucks fans should at least be prepared for the very real possibility that jennings is traded by feb.


Green font?

What does "green font?" mean?
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4190 » by thomchatt3rton » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:10 pm

also, whats the point of drafting by the "best player available" theory if said player is untouchable? it would kind of defeat the purpose of drafting for value if you then refused to parlay that value into a real asset. i maintain that hammond might be playing this whole thing right- if sessions goes because somebody pays him too much, then we still have jennings. or if we keep sessions, we get a deal on him, and we have two cards to deal before feb, should the right deal come along, and after we've had a chance to see jennings play an actual NBA game.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4191 » by Bernman » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:14 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Agreed. Great point.

That is what I really like about Jennings. He actually made some superstar type plays in summer league. We haven't seen that in the past from prior draft picks like Bogut, Yi or Alexander in their summer league stints. Heck, the game recap below from 2005 probably foreshadowed something for us..... 8-)

Andrew Bogut Ejected From Summer League Game

07.19.2005 - Updated on 07.20.2005

Number one draft pick Andrew Bogut was ejected from Monday night’s game following an incident involving John Edwards of the Indiana Pacers. Edwards accidentally knocked the former Utah star down as he ran by, causing Bogut to leap to his feet and pursue him. Teammates intervened before any real altercation could develop, but both players were ejected nonetheless.

Bogut scored six points and collected four fouls in the game, while allowing his opposite number, David Harrison, to score fourteen in the first half.


So it foreshadowed that Bogut would be a bad man-to-man defender in the NBA because he allowed David Harrison to score 14 points against in limited action? If anything that event chips away at the relevancy of summer league results.

Having a pretty good (not great, DX didn't even award him 3rd team all-rookie honors, he was a 2nd teamer IMO) summer league is a positive indicator, but let's not get carried away at how it will translate to success. For example he hit outside shots at a rate he never has before (made me cringe about his shot selection about 25 times, literally) and played far more transition basketball than he'll ever see in the league due to undisciplined team defenses. Nobody questioned that the guy had talent. The major question about him was would it translate to a high # of wins ever. That question hasn't remotely been answered yet. I'm pretty sure every GM knew he could do "stuff". Yet 9 still neglected to take him.

thomchatt3rton wrote:What does "green font?" mean?


That some of us get too involved in internet culture.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,414
And1: 28,046
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4192 » by trwi7 » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:17 pm

Bernman wrote:That some of us get too involved in internet culture.


Bernman is trying to change the culture of the internet.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
blueedwards
Banned User
Posts: 1,790
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 20, 2008

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4193 » by blueedwards » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:31 pm

thomchatt3rton wrote:


Green font?
What does "green font?" mean?
Means they drank grape koolaid and pooping green now. :lol: True story. :wink:
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4194 » by Bernman » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:34 pm

thomchatt3rton wrote:also, whats the point of drafting by the "best player available" theory if said player is untouchable? it would kind of defeat the purpose of drafting for value if you then refused to parlay that value into a real asset.


In general that's very true.....but if people think that Hammond was drafting with a strict BPA philosophy in mind then they are kidding themselves. And I guess the exception would be if picking BPA also fills a need. Then you have your answer at that position long term and trading off your value pick isn't necessary.

trwi7 wrote:
Bernman wrote:That some of us get too involved in internet culture.


Bernman is trying to change the culture of the internet.


To one that's a little less geeky and pretentious.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,405
And1: 2,236
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4195 » by thomchatt3rton » Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:54 pm

blueedwards wrote:
thomchatt3rton wrote:


Green font?
What does "green font?" mean?
Means they drank grape koolaid and pooping green now. :lol: True story. :wink:

aha. just as i suspected.
thank you very much for confirming the "purple-koolaid-and-green-poop" explanation.
because that particular theory was the leading candidate amongst several other well thought-out theories, hypothesis, and speculations that i had been researching and experimenting.
and i'm happy- no, i am grateful- to see it finally confirmed as scientific fact. eureka.
etc.



:wink:
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,379
And1: 20,919
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4196 » by AussieBuck » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:02 am

BucksRUS wrote:
msiris wrote:
I am sorry, but SL is nothing compared to the real deal.


For Jennings that is all we have.

At least we have one honest Jennings fan. Jennings the superstar, Summer League told us so.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,439
And1: 1,481
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4197 » by Sigra » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:48 am

Wise1 wrote:Barring major injuries to any starter or key reserve, I see the Bucks winning 40-45 games. If they fail to do so, then I'd say it's time to trade Bogut if we can steal real value for him.


I agree. If Bogut can't lead this (healthy) team to 40 wins then he should be traded without any doubt.

Wise1 wrote:Bogut needs to be at least an Okafor level player to justify keeping him.


:lol: Bogut is so much better than Okafor that is not even funny
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,785
And1: 6,998
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4198 » by LUKE23 » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:57 am

This team isn't that talented. To expect 40 wins as a low point if healthy is comical beyond words. Look at the f'ing roster.
User avatar
Sigra
RealGM
Posts: 15,439
And1: 1,481
Joined: Sep 08, 2005
Location: Aug 02, 2002
     

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4199 » by Sigra » Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:04 am

LUKE23 wrote:This team isn't that talented. To expect 40 wins as a low point if healthy is comical beyond words. Look at the f'ing roster.


People say that I am Bogut fan more than anything. So isn't my position above fair enough? If Bogut can't lead this (healthy) team to 40 wins than I admit that I was wrong about him and that he is not nearly as good as I thought. Fair enough?
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,785
And1: 6,998
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Re: Sessions Update:Knicks a no-go per Hahn/Chubby (pg 250) 

Post#4200 » by LUKE23 » Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:07 am

No, because if we don't win 40 it won't be because of him, it will be because we weren't talented enough going in. Look at the roster Sigra. We don't have starting caliber players at SF or PF, and our PG's are Ridnour and a rookie.

I know everyone is expecting this team that works really hard and plays unselfish, but you need top end talent to win. If Jennings is a stud from the get go, then I hear you, but if he isn't, this will be a lottery team.

Every player we picked up this offseason other than Jennings is meant to be a bench player on a good team.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks