Official Speculation Thread (Pt XII, Mods Close)

Post #421 » by **eyriq** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:03 am

Hey, if we can get Nash without moving Nelson I'd be ecstatic.

BelgianMagic · Post #422 » by **BelgianMagic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:04 am

eyriq wrote:Hey, if we can get Nash without moving Nelson I'd be ecstatic.

Even if that means moving Anderson?

I'd rather move Nelson than Ryan .. Ryan should be untouchable if the player coming to Orlando isn't named Monta Ellis or Deron Williams

ADRajX · Post #423 » by **ADRajX** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:04 am

rcklsscognition wrote:
RT @MP2474: if ORL offer, JJ, Jameer, Ryan, Orten & pick, for Nash & Fyre, they do it?? Suns need to make a biz dec --> who sells more Tix?

HELL NO!

rcklsscognition · Post #424 » by **rcklsscognition** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:07 am

I was told "if" the Suns traded him, it would be to rid themselves of bad contracts... so who wants Josh Childress and Hakim Warrick.

rcklsscognition · Post #425 » by **rcklsscognition** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:09 am

DJRajX wrote:
rcklsscognition wrote:
RT @MP2474: if ORL offer, JJ, Jameer, Ryan, Orten & pick, for Nash & Fyre, they do it?? Suns need to make a biz dec --> who sells more Tix?

HELL NO!

Kyler must have 15 Nash tweets in the last 30 minutes. He's getting flooded. More than anything, I don't think anyone gives Suns players that will fill the seats, so it comes down to taking a bad contract back from the Suns.

Post #426 » by **eyriq** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:10 am

I've always like Childress.

Phantom418 · Post #427 » by **Phantom418** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:10 am

rcklsscognition wrote:I was told "if" the Suns traded him, it would be to rid themselves of bad contracts... so who wants Josh Childress and Hakim Warrick.

If we didn't had Glen, I wouldn't mind Warrick. Childress' contract looks really toxic, I don't think I could stomach that one even if it meant getting Nash.

rcklsscognition · Post #428 » by **rcklsscognition** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:11 am

Phantom418 wrote:
rcklsscognition wrote:I was told "if" the Suns traded him, it would be to rid themselves of bad contracts... so who wants Josh Childress and Hakim Warrick.

If we didn't had Glen, I wouldn't mind Warrick. Childress' contract looks really toxic, I don't think I could stomach that one even if it meant getting Nash.

We gotta have someone to hate on the team.

BelgianMagic · Post #429 » by **BelgianMagic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:12 am

I've always considered Warrick/Childress as solid role-players .. Wouldn't mind bringing in one of them

Would prefer Childress. Always considered him a little underrated

Blue_and_Whte · Post #430 » by **Blue_and_Whte** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:15 am

BelgianMagic wrote:
eyriq wrote:Hey, if we can get Nash without moving Nelson I'd be ecstatic.

Even if that means moving Anderson?

I'd rather move Nelson than Ryan .. Ryan should be untouchable if the player coming to Orlando isn't named Monta Ellis or Deron Williams

Well duh...Obviously not.

Reverse_Angle · Post #431 » by **Reverse_Angle** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:19 am

Phantom418 wrote:
rcklsscognition wrote:I was told "if" the Suns traded him, it would be to rid themselves of bad contracts... so who wants Josh Childress and Hakim Warrick.

If we didn't had Glen, I wouldn't mind Warrick. Childress' contract looks really toxic, I don't think I could stomach that one even if it meant getting Nash.

you should always mind hakim regardless of what we have and Childress did not fit to what gentry had in mind. Josh can play 2-4.

The Real Dalic · Post #432 » by **The Real Dalic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:19 am

eyriq wrote:I've always like Childress.

BelgianMagic · Post #433 » by **BelgianMagic** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:20 am

Blue_and_Whte wrote:
BelgianMagic wrote:
eyriq wrote:Hey, if we can get Nash without moving Nelson I'd be ecstatic.

Even if that means moving Anderson?

I'd rather move Nelson than Ryan .. Ryan should be untouchable if the player coming to Orlando isn't named Monta Ellis or Deron Williams

Well duh...Obviously not.

I know, that's why I used the word untouchable

But of course, we all know Otis & he'll probably give in to trading Anderson cause he's gonna be so desperate to trade for Nash

ADRajX · Post #434 » by **ADRajX** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:23 am

rcklsscognition wrote:
DJRajX wrote:HELL NO!

Kyler must have 15 Nash tweets in the last 30 minutes. He's getting flooded. More than anything, I don't think anyone gives Suns players that will fill the seats, so it comes down to taking a bad contract back from the Suns.

very true.. either Frye or Childress

thelead · Post #435 » by **thelead** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:23 am

If we take those long term contracts they have to take hedo or Duhon/QRich back... We'll lose Dwight next year anyways if we're stuck with a bunch of 4 and 5 year deals (being unable to go after Ellis in 2013).

rcklsscognition · Post #436 » by **rcklsscognition** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:25 am

thelead wrote:If we take those long term contracts they have to take hedo or Duhon/QRich back... We'll lose Dwight next year anyways if we're stuck with a bunch of 4 and 5 year deals (being unable to go after Ellis in 2013).

Does Nash give us a legitimate chance at a ring this year? If so, is it worth that chance for those contracts?

Nyce_1 · Post #437 » by **Nyce_1** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:25 am

What's the deal with Childress and why is he barely getting PT? Is he that bad?

thelead · Post #438 » by **thelead** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:32 am

Love this deal found on the PHX board (picks going to PHX):

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8y9jljl

rcklsscognition · Post #439 » by **rcklsscognition** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:41 am

thelead wrote:Love this deal found on the PHX board (picks going to PHX):

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8y9jljl

Do that in a heartbeat. It's so straightforward.

arkknight1988 · Post #440 » by **arkknight1988** » Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:45 am

thelead wrote:Love this deal found on the PHX board (picks going to PHX):

http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=8y9jljl

that's a dream deal for us. nash/jrich/Q/anderson/dwight. hedo helps ease our loss of jj off the bench.

taking back more bad contracts is a bad idea IMO but we can afford to send out our 1st rounder in a deal for nash

this is one of those rare trades that make sense for all teams. minny would love to get jj while draft picks+ beasley is a good return for phx. if dwight and nash both walk at the end of their year then getting a ton of capspace would help some.