nikster wrote:Synciere wrote:shakes0 wrote:
sorry, I need to see FACTS before I accept blatant race baiting as ok.
So you believe Stephen A should air out white executives and coaches to prove a point here?
Yeah if he is gonna make claims like that at least on example would be great. And if he has the information he should definitely out them
Hard to take SAS take as nothing more than inflammatory wild speculation considering that 1)in recent years the league has taken issues like this more seriously and 2) a white person was fired from a high ranking NBA job just a year ago for inappropriate workplace relationships and 3) inflammatory speculation is literally how he makes his career
An example would help, I agree, but I don't think it's necessary. I've asked someone else in this thread if they're saying in the history of the NBA, in which probably 90% of the coaches, executives, and owners have been white, if they believe there's never been an instance where an member of the organization had a consensual relationship with a subordinate?
A person cannot reasonably think about that question and come up with any other answer other than, of course there have examples of something like this happening. I don't think Stephen A should destroy an (relatively speaking) innocent person to make a point here. I think what happened here is the woman's husband demanded some type of punishment publicly and the Celtics brass relented, though I'm not exactly sure why. That said, this was a reasonable question to ask by Stephen A. imo. Inflammatory commentary is how many people in the industry make their careers. Stephen A. is hardly the exception, or even a pioneer. I give that title to Mad Dog Russo personally, since I remember him from the 90s, but you'll never hear some of the nasty rhetoric said about Stephen A used to describe Russo. That's another thing though...























