Froob wrote:somebody said the other day celtics won’t win game 3 unless OG or bridges gets hurt. aged well
OG was hurt though , blindness =2 points

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, ken6199, Domejandro, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Froob wrote:somebody said the other day celtics won’t win game 3 unless OG or bridges gets hurt. aged well
KamikazeK wrote:I told y'all there's no shot NYK win this series. They got two lucky games with dreadful shooting and that's all they're gonna get.
AussieCeltic wrote:Lalouie wrote:this game is abhorrent....up by almost 30 and they STILL want to shoot 3s
their D better hold because they're going to shoot themselves in the foot again....unless nyk has already decided to pack it in
Yeh crazy the team that is hot from 3 should shoot open 3’s. wild
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:Capn'O wrote:Um... Arky???
I’m here , come in and let’s celebrate
Lalouie wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:Lalouie wrote:this game is abhorrent....up by almost 30 and they STILL want to shoot 3s
their D better hold because they're going to shoot themselves in the foot again....unless nyk has already decided to pack it in
Yeh crazy the team that is hot from 3 should shoot open 3’s. wild
dont be lame. have you not watched the first 2 games
give me a reason to shoot 3s when youre up by 30 and dont say "because theyre open". ALL 3s ARE OPEN because no one wants to foul a 3pt
shooter
the thought behind "live by the 3 die by the 3" is because its a streaky self imposed do or die shot. the idea behind running a shooter off the line is because you dont really want to foul him
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
OldCeltics wrote:Knicks are not a good team. They lost to Celtics all 4 games this season. Celtics went up by 20 game 1 and 2, and then the coasted, and let Knicks take it, but realistically it should have been a sweep.
California Gold wrote:OldCeltics wrote:Knicks are not a good team. They lost to Celtics all 4 games this season. Celtics went up by 20 game 1 and 2, and then the coasted, and let Knicks take it, but realistically it should have been a sweep.
If you guys lose game 4, the series is over. So while it might be true that the Celtics have dominated, we've seen teams before dominate teams and still lose series'. In fact the Nuggets did it a few years ago to the Lakers with a similar time of leading in the entire series as this one. Sometimes it's about how you finish games, the Celtics still haven't learned from years ago about blowing leads. They were fine last year but have reverted back a bit to previous years. I'm more surprised because they have a diff coach now in Mazzulla but it's on the players to get over that mental hurdle.
NoStatsGuy wrote:KamikazeK wrote:I told y'all there's no shot NYK win this series. They got two lucky games with dreadful shooting and that's all they're gonna get.
you also said its gonna be a 2nd round bye
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
jbk1234 wrote:The Celtics have a solid defense, but they're not tge Grindhouse Grizzlies at their peak. Some of what I'm seeing is just bad defense.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.