E-DC wrote:PaKii94 wrote:cjbulls wrote:
I'd have to see the salary gap between the two. I think Collins probably has more untapped potential stemming from being stuck with Trae in that system. He also may be able to play more center than Lauri.
I don't understand Drummond though with him. Not enough defense for my taste at the 4/5. Plus then you are capped out with Zach.
Don't get fooled by John collins guys. He's a perfect example of "grass is greener on the other side". "stuck with trae"? lolololTrae is who makes him what he is! The attention he draws and the playmaking he provides is a great help to Collins.
1) We rag on Lauri's lack of self creation -> John Collins is FULLY playmaking dependent.
2 point FG assisted rate:
Lauri- this year (61%) -> second highest of career, career (53%)
Collins- this year (65%) -> lowest by far of career, career (73%)
2) Lauri is by far the better shooter compared to Collins. His 3 point rate is nearly 2x that of collins. That's a more valuable trait to have than "dunks"
3) Lauri's FT rate is again higher than Collins even though Collins is a lot more of a rim runner/traditional big. (Lauri is also the better FT shooter) That's a more valuable trait
4) We rag on Lauri's rebounding but Collins' isn't that much better. They are similar defensive rebounders (% wise) Collins is a better offensive rebounder but I think that's to be a given considering how close he plays to the basket. His average distance of play is 8 ft (this year is the highest at 11 ft). Lauri on the other hand plays at the minimum of 15 ft (almost double!).
5) Lauri is more efficient while creating more and taking a LOT more jumpers
6) Defense wise both are poor. Rim protection is probably a wash. I think Lauri is the better perimeter defender. IMO Collins is both mental + physical deficiency on defense. Lauri it's mostly physical.
I'd rather have the more shot creating/sharpshooting big with potential to be okay on defense. But I can see how a more athletic specimen would be more enticing.
This is something I had noticed last years when I was comparing Lauri and Collins. It's also worth noting that during Lauri's rookie season 64% of his 2P FG's came by way of assists and then over the last two seasons that percentage plummeted to around 53%. Bulls fans often point out that Lauri's shooting percentages haven't improved, but fail to note this discrepancy. 53% is a low percentage for a big man not named Giannis or Durant. Anthony Davis's career percentage is 67%, Sabonis' is 66%, Porzingis is 66%, and Adebayo, Zion, and Wood are all at 69%. And as you point out Lauri's percentage this season is 61% which is still relatively low compared to the career averages of his peers.
Pretty much. It gets glossed over because of the fact that Lauri unlike these other bigs has a much great proportion of shots from 3 point range which are inherently more assisted which bumps up his overall assisted percentage.





















