basketballRob wrote:Skybox wrote:tiderulz wrote:you like him more than Hendricks in that role?
I do but wtf do I know?
Just seems like more upside to me. I like the 3pt shooting, but I see too much Bo Outlaw (vs Ben Wallace)…let’s not mess that up again
…and, I get that he’s not a center. Just a really good, versatile bet
I don't want to knock on another prospect, but he's a way better defender than Hendricks. Hendricks goes for every block and gets burned a lot. Walker plays a lot smarter. I have Hendricks at the 10-12 range. He's like a Chris Boucher or Christian Wood to me.
Wallace was 6'7" without shoes and Walker is 6'6.5".
Sent from my SM-G781U using
RealGM mobile app
Few things:
Ben Wallace in modern era is just Biyombo 2.
Most of things that worked in favor of Big Ben in today's era don't exist such are:
- ultra slow pace
- no spacing
- no high pick&roll efficient action to force him to leave paint
- inefficient chuckers who were in love with mid range fadeaway 2s and made defense look better than it is
- officiating that by today's standards would mean majority of Pistons team would foul out by half time
Jarace Walker, standing below 6'7 isn't just undersized big, he is below average nba player in terms of size. Yes, guy has great insticts, but also has body that is mature and that allows him to be imposing physically vs colleg players. But he won't be playing bullyball on anybody in nba with that size.
It's not like he is some ultra polished , crafty, mini- Duncan type of finess scorer either. I saw somwhere that he shot 40% on non-dunk shots from point blank range.
Basically you are drafting for mini Robert Williams and hoping he can eventually become bit more of Horford/PJ Tucker in terms of shooting. I , personally, don't belive he will be good 3 point shooter in nba any time soon. His percentages don't look bad, but it's 100 attemps sample size. His FTs also don't paint picture of some great shooter either ( 80 attemps 66%).
Given all the mentioned, i don't think Jarace Walker is top 10-worthy lottery pick in any nba draft.
All defense but very limited size, no defined offensive skill, lot of question marks about how and where to use him, typical NBA tweener stuck between size for SF, weight of PF and skillset for limited C normally don't translate well into nba.
Even when you read his player comparisons, most common name that pops is Paul Millsap... Guy was 47th pick for same reasons. And this guy is projected top 10? Why? Well, i assume i know why, but that reason is something most people don't want to hear it: this draft is very much role-players-galore between 4th -20th pick. So having two lottery picks isn't as rewarding as it would be in some previous years.
You asked me who would i draft 6th. i already answered that question in past. i wouldn't. I don't see any objective adventage of drafting that high for pool of talent that is expected to have. I would trade down to 10-16 range or trade out 6# pick for future picks. Not a single person aveliable at that range is sure shot nba starter let alone star. And we really don't need new Bamba, Hezonja, Payton.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon