Crymson wrote:Mr Peanut wrote:It's been said earlier in the thread, but we can't be considered a team serious about making noise in the East if we go into next season with Tobias as our lone rotation quality PF option. Ausar/Holland are good for spot minutes but shouldn't be relied upon to play significant time alongside Stew in our bench rotation (and Ausar will be our starting SF anyway). Fontecchio's production was not deserving of minutes last year and we can't just assume he will suddenly return to his 2023/24 form. It doesn't necessarily have to be Portis, but you do need another rotation quality PF on the roster. Injuries happen.
There was a similar discussion on this board last off-season following the draft/FA when Cade and Ivey were the only ball-handlers/reasonable PG options on the roster, and many of us were advocating for another PG because it was clear that Sasser wasn't ideal in this role and we were an injury away from trouble. Lo and behold Ivey got injured and we faced that situation - we were fortuitous that Schroder was available at the deadline, but ideally you don't want to rely on mid-season trades to fix your roster deficiencies and need to plan your depth in advance for these scenarios.
I'm all for it if it doesn't open up even bigger holes elsewhere by depriving the Pistons of Beasley or Schroder. But that's the trouble: anyone they add in that situation is going to be a 10th man (behind Cade, Ivey, Schroder, Beasley, Ausar, Holland, Tobias, Stewart, and Duren, assuming he's not replaced) who might average 10 MPG in a healthy rotation, and finding a solid player who'll be satisfied with being guaranteed so few minutes is likely to be tough. Do you have anyone in mind?
For what it's worth, I think this particular gap is substantially smaller than the gaping pre-Schroder hole where another reliable lead handler should've been.
Finally -- though I don't believe you're claiming otherwise -- I think that many here might be overestimating the degree to which the front office is prioritizing "making noise in the East" next season versus focusing sufficiently on development and building sustainably. This was a 43-win team last season in a weak conference, and it's got youth with substantial room for potential growth. Though I understand why folks want more wins, this roster is not in a win-now situation.
No particular backup PF in mind just yet. I think when our season finished I was pretty comfortable with us "running it back" and looking to re-sign Beasley/Schroder and largely keeping the roster as is, with some small moves around the edges. But as the playoffs have worn on and certain events have occurred (the Tatum injury, Indy's improbable run to the Finals, Bane trade to Orlando, Miami's possible acquisition of KD), I've pondered whether sitting on our hands (a) potentially leads to us being "left behind" as other teams in the East make significant improvements (b) results in us not taking advantage next season of a conference with no clear elite team, and the lost opportunity of potentially making our own run to the Finals like the Pacers have this year.
I'd be open to at least kicking the tyres on guys like JJJ and Trey Murphy III - acknowledging that it would take a sizeable haul for those teams to even consider trading them. And then if/when that fails moving on to more realistic options like Aldama and Naz Reid, with the strong likelihood that those end up as S&T scenarios with matching salary and we could still retain some cap space to at least keep Beasley.
I don't think any of the above are just "win now" moves as those guys all fit the timeline of our young core. But they do help us to keep up with other teams making moves and then take the next step into the upper echelon of the East. Call me sceptical that we will get there with just internal development alone.
So it's hard for me to say who we should chase as our backup PF as I think we should actually be trying to chase a starting one first and then working backwards from there.