RedBulls23 wrote:HomoSapien wrote:RedBulls23 wrote:That would make sense if AKs goal wasn't to try and win with said players.
I highly doubt they are looking for a rebuild. They are looking to dump Zach so they can reup DeMar.
In the sense of short term team building with DeMar and Vuc, this trade makes little sense and in the sense of long term team building, not getting back any picks for easily your best asset and only getting back a very flawed player makes little sense. But AK is great at making moves that make very little sense.
This kind of reminds me of the Butler trade in a really small way. I never bought that Minnesota would walk away over the inclusion of the pick and I definitely don't believe that OKC was unwilling to part with any of there 37 picks. Just dumb.
Additonally, the trade doesn't even help them on the cap sheet right now, and next off- season Giddey has a bigger cap hold and you have to decide to extend him long term. So potentially, you got back zero longterm value for Caruso if they don't extend Giddey.
Would rather pay a 22 year old starter than a 31 year old backup. Makes sense for our impending rebuild.


















