RealGM Top 100 List #29

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,206
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#61 » by ElGee » Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:05 pm

DavidStern wrote:BTW, old but non injured Stockton against prime Payton in 2000 playoffs:
13 ppg, 60.6 TS%, 12.2 apg, 2.0 spg, 3.2 rpg and only 2.4 tpg.


Btw, Shammond Williams was guarding Stockton (mostly from I can tell/remember) in the first two games. In G3, down 2-0, they dropped the WIlliams experiment and Payton had 23-10-7 (39% TS) while Stockton was 1-8. Not that I even think that says much -- Stockton usually took about 9 shots per game at that point in the rhythm of the offense when they were available...and his assists numbers weren't reflected of massive creation. They did seem to also have this trap/zone thing going on...

Speaking of TOV, one of the things that doesn't dissuade me much about Payton's relatively low shooting numbers is he is one of the lower TOV players in NBA history. Indeed, for guys averaging 7 ast/36, he owns 4 of the 7 lowest TOV% seasons: http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... r_by_asc=Y

And if we put the cutoff at 8 ast/36, Payton's 2002 is the lowest TOV% season ever. Turnovers are considerably worse than missed shots...
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#62 » by lorak » Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:37 pm

ElGee wrote:
DavidStern wrote:BTW, old but non injured Stockton against prime Payton in 2000 playoffs:
13 ppg, 60.6 TS%, 12.2 apg, 2.0 spg, 3.2 rpg and only 2.4 tpg.


Btw, Shammond Williams was guarding Stockton (mostly from I can tell/remember) in the first two games.


I don't know, don't have this games break down play by play, but I have some from 1996 series and for example in G1 Stockton FG against different defenders was:
vs Kemp: 0/1
vs Payton: 2/2 (!)
vs Hawkins: 0/3
vs Askew: 0/2
vs no one: 0/2
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,417
And1: 15,985
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#63 » by therealbig3 » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:53 pm

Laimbeer wrote:Wow, what's with all the McGrady love?

He was anything but a winner. The guy bailed on Toronto. He ran his mouth during a playoff series against Detroit and was made to look foolish. In a game seven against Dallas his team was destroyed by something like 40 points.

He didn't play hard and he wasn't mentally tough. He was the anti-Russell, the poster child for playoff failure. It may be that his teams weren't bonafide title contenders, but seriously, losing in the first round that many times?


I think you're being extremely selective in what you're choosing to remember about McGrady. You're using 2-3 examples throughout his career, and ignoring how good he actually he was.

He didn't run his mouth against Detroit. If I remember correctly, he said it was good to finally be in position to advance to the 2nd round. He didn't say they were definitely going to the 2nd round, he just said they were in position to...which was true.

In that game 7 against Dallas, he put up 27/7/7. And for the series he averaged 31/7/7 on 56% TS. And he hit the game-winner in game 2, and the main reason his team was even in a game 7 was because he put up a monster 37/8/7 in game 6. And throughout the series, he was tasked with guarding Dirk, and probably forced him into the worst playoff series of his career.

He didn't play hard and he wasn't mentally tough...proof? I don't understand why people say this about guys who didn't have the luck of playing with great teams...because he didn't win, then it must have been because he didn't play hard or he wasn't mentally tough. I actually think he was incredibly mentally tough...how many guys could keep going after the myriad of injuries he had? How many guys would have just called it quits? And you also have to take into account how embarrassing it is for T-Mac, to have once been on top of the NBA world, relegated to being a back-up PG...but he handled it with class, and he actually played well.

I mean, I used to make fun of him being injury-prone and "soft", but someone once told me that if I suffered from back spasms like he did, then I wouldn't be making fun of him, but that I would actually respect him...apparently, back spasms are pretty intense, and they can literally cripple you when you get them, but many times, T-Mac was able to actually walk off the court when he got back spasms. And wasn't he going through some personal problems around 08 or so...I think he's a pretty mentally tough guy.

In terms of work ethic, yeah, I've heard that he slacked off too, and relied more on his physical gifts...but then again so did Shaq. So does LeBron. They've been lucky enough to not have career-threatening injuries though. And honestly, I don't see how that criticism holds true in Orlando...the guy carried the team night in and night out, and even in Houston, he was the only consistent offensive threat...I think he worked harder than people give him credit for.

And with regards to the 40-point loss to Houston in Game 7...why does Kobe get so much love from you? He basically shot his team out of a championship in 04, he seemingly "gave up" in a game 7 against Phoenix, in which his team lost by 31 points (and also lost a 3-1 lead), his team lost by 39 points in the closeout game in the 08 Finals (a series in which he didn't play that great), and his team just recently got swept and lost by 36 points in game 4 against Dallas (another series in which he didn't play that great).

I don't think these points have that much weight, but if you're going to use it against McGrady, then at least be consistent.
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,206
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#64 » by ElGee » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:07 pm

DavidStern wrote:
ElGee wrote:
DavidStern wrote:BTW, old but non injured Stockton against prime Payton in 2000 playoffs:
13 ppg, 60.6 TS%, 12.2 apg, 2.0 spg, 3.2 rpg and only 2.4 tpg.


Btw, Shammond Williams was guarding Stockton (mostly from I can tell/remember) in the first two games.


I don't know, don't have this games break down play by play, but I have some from 1996 series and for example in G1 Stockton FG against different defenders was:
vs Kemp: 0/1
vs Payton: 2/2 (!)
vs Hawkins: 0/3
vs Askew: 0/2
vs no one: 0/2


Haha. Pwned.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,417
And1: 15,985
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#65 » by therealbig3 » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:13 pm

Here's my count so far:

Vote:

Isiah-4 (JordansBulls, Dr Mufasa, drza, Laimbeer)

Barry-4 (DavidStern, therealbig3, ronnymac2, TMACFORMVP)

Stockton-2 (mysticbb, FJS)

Payton-2 (ElGee, Fencer reregistered)

Gilmore-1 (penbeast0)



Nominate:

McGrady-5 (JordansBulls, ElGee, drza, therealbig3, TMACFORMVP)

Moncrief-2 (penbeast0, DavidStern)

Miller-1 (mysticbb)

Dominique-1 (Dr Mufasa)

Cousy-1 (Laimbeer)

Hayes-1 (FJS)

McAdoo-1 (ronnymac2)

McHale-1 (Fencer reregistered)
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#66 » by Fencer reregistered » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:34 pm

Payton isn't going to win this. I'll change from Payton to Isiah.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Eagle24
Banned User
Posts: 93
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 16, 2011

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#67 » by Eagle24 » Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:54 pm

therealbig3 wrote:[

He basically shot his team out of a championship in 04,

Yeah, he really shot them out of it with the rest of the team (outside Shaq) shooting 33%, and the Lakers losing by a average margin of 15 pts a game, not to mention the biggest blowout loss coming in the game where he only took 13 shots. :lol:
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,206
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#68 » by ElGee » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:01 am

With no Payton love...

I'm again changing my vote to Rick Barry.
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,417
And1: 15,985
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#69 » by therealbig3 » Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:09 am

Eagle24 wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:[

He basically shot his team out of a championship in 04,

Yeah, he really shot them out of it with the rest of the team (outside Shaq) shooting 33%, and the Lakers losing by a average margin of 15 pts a game, not to mention the biggest blowout loss coming in the game where he only took 13 shots. :lol:


Wow, chill out...he was criticizing McGrady for things he shouldn't be blamed for...and I was pointing out that using that logic, you can look at some of the things Kobe's done in his career and criticize him too; he did have very questionable shot selection, he did seem to avoid feeding the ball to Shaq and stubbornly look to score, so you can raise some questions about his performance...but I also said that I don't think those criticisms hold much weight either...
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 29,978
And1: 9,672
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#70 » by penbeast0 » Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:39 am

Well, I can't see either Isiah or Barry this high. Though I'd favor Isiah over Barry, I have both Payton and Stockton over Isiah. I'll change my vote to Stockton since the Paytonians are abandoning him and leave it to someone else to break the tie.

SUDDEN DEATH! (or 6 votes for someone else)

VOTING

3-John Stockton – mystic bb, FJS, penbeast0

5-Isiah Thomas – JordansBulls, Dr Mufasa, drza, Laimbeer, Fencer

5-Rick Barry – TMACFORMVP, ronnymac2, David Stern, therealbig3, ElGee

NOMINATE

Reggie Miller – mysticbb

2-Sidney Moncrief – penbeast0, David Stern

5-Tracy McGrady – JordansBulls, TMACFORMVP, ElGee, drza, therealbig3

Dominique Wilkins – Dr Mufasa

Bob Cousy -- Laimbeer

Elvin Hayes – FJS

Kevin McHale – Fencer

Bob McAdoo – ronnymac2
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
drza
Analyst
Posts: 3,518
And1: 1,859
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#71 » by drza » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:18 am

Just out of curiosity...what's the policy for a tie vote? I mean, we're after midnight now and it's technically time for the next vote. How do we resolve this?
Creator of the Hoops Lab: tinyurl.com/mpo2brj
Contributor to NylonCalculusDOTcom
Contributor to TYTSports: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTbFEVCpx9shKEsZl7FcRHzpGO1dPoimk
Follow on Twitter: @ProfessorDrz
JordansBulls
RealGM
Posts: 60,466
And1: 5,344
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#72 » by JordansBulls » Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:20 am

drza wrote:Just out of curiosity...what's the policy for a tie vote? I mean, we're after midnight now and it's technically time for the next vote. How do we resolve this?

I thought it was the posters who voted for others have to change to one of the two guys tied.
Image
"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#73 » by lorak » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:31 am

In previous thread fatal voted Barry. Maybe he had some problems and that's why he didn't vote in this thread (I for example had problem with realGM forums during last 2 days and have to use proxy to been able to read board). So maybe we should count his vote and this would break tie.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,417
And1: 15,985
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#74 » by therealbig3 » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:43 am

DavidStern wrote:In previous thread fatal voted Barry. Maybe he had some problems and that's why he didn't vote in this thread (I for example had problem with realGM forums during last 2 days and have to use proxy to been able to read board). So maybe we should count his vote and this would break tie.


Eh, I don't think that's fair, because there's a few voters in this project who haven't voted in this thread...we shouldn't assume who they would vote for either.

Personally, I've had my mind changed from thread to thread because of some great arguments, the same thing could have happened for him.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#75 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:47 am

therealbig3 wrote:
DavidStern wrote:In previous thread fatal voted Barry. Maybe he had some problems and that's why he didn't vote in this thread (I for example had problem with realGM forums during last 2 days and have to use proxy to been able to read board). So maybe we should count his vote and this would break tie.


Eh, I don't think that's fair, because there's a few voters in this project who haven't voted in this thread...we shouldn't assume who they would vote for either.

Personally, I've had my mind changed from thread to thread because of some great arguments, the same thing could have happened for him.


Right. Sudden-death can take care of the possibility that he wants to vote Barry again.

Meanwhile, I'll change to Stockton if a Barry supporter does too. :)
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#76 » by lorak » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am

No solution would be good in this case, because our voting system is bad ;]

BTW, Barry was nominated 5 spots over Isiah, and that was when more people participated (23 people voted then, in this thread only 13....). I think it should count for something. Maybe even that should be the rule - tie is broken by looking who was nominated first. For sure something like sudden death isn't the best solution.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#77 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:59 am

DavidStern wrote:No solution would be good in this case, because our voting system is bad ;]

BTW, Barry was nominated 5 spots over Isiah, and that was when more people participated (23 people voted then, in this thread only 13....). I think it should count for something. Maybe even that should be the rule - tie is broken by looking who was nominated first. For sure something like sudden death isn't the best solution.


Noooooo. Then you're just saying the nomination vote is a list vote 10 slots early.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 40,898
And1: 27,760
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#78 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:01 am

DavidStern wrote: . For sure something like sudden death isn't the best solution.

A run-off would be natural.

Penbeast didn't help anything by detecting the need for something like a run-off and then immediately declaring his abstention (in effect).
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
ElGee
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,041
And1: 1,206
Joined: Mar 08, 2010
Contact:

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#79 » by ElGee » Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:05 am

Doc MJ votes Barry...so that should take care of it. http://twitter.com/#!/mathjohnson
Check out and discuss my book, now on Kindle! http://www.backpicks.com/thinking-basketball/
lorak
Head Coach
Posts: 6,317
And1: 2,237
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

Re: RealGM Top 100 List #29 

Post#80 » by lorak » Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:31 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:
DavidStern wrote:No solution would be good in this case, because our voting system is bad ;]

BTW, Barry was nominated 5 spots over Isiah, and that was when more people participated (23 people voted then, in this thread only 13....). I think it should count for something. Maybe even that should be the rule - tie is broken by looking who was nominated first. For sure something like sudden death isn't the best solution.


Noooooo. Then you're just saying the nomination vote is a list vote 10 slots early.


I'm just saying that nomination should break a tie. That's not the same as: "we shouldn't vote at all, just make list based on nominations" ;]

Return to Player Comparisons