emotional wrote::They don't have the ability to watch a game and see his impact, good or bad, and then be able to use stats later to verify or contradict what they've seen.
YES, only people on Realgm have the ability to watch the heavily televised Laker games and go on a site like ESPN and look at advanced stats lol Talk about delusional
:At least according to any one over 20 with the least bit of music objectivity?
You like empiricism, back this up with proof that backs up your assertion
Kobe isn't popular because he is on ESPN a lot but because he, along with Tim Duncan, are the two quintessential winners in their sport. They both have been top 10 players for the last 15 years as well. The media will always talk about a top player who wins. They aren't constructing some undeserved mediocre star player like you are trying to frame it.
One Direction? Yes because the mechanisms that make the music industry work at all similar to The NBA. Good job.
Also, I love all the fabrications from people pissed that I think Kobe is a top 7-8 player, same people have him no lower than 12, by saying that I don't value stats or empiricism. Let me be clear, math is an incredibly helpful tool to gain insight into the madness of anything but it is not a toll that can give a fully encompassing description of what occurs.
Are you Nairobi in disguise? Jeez, you come in and insult, give your opinions, and when someone else gives an opinion you trot out the old "prove it".
And using Kobe and Duncan kinda proves the point. Duncan is a better player and has also won a lot but they hardly ever talk about him.











