Loneshot wrote:I wouldn't mind all the threes if the defense was allowed to be a little more hands-on as dudes are getting a lot of uncontested layups/dunks.
Agreed. I'm fine with 3s as long as players are allowed to play some real defense.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Loneshot wrote:I wouldn't mind all the threes if the defense was allowed to be a little more hands-on as dudes are getting a lot of uncontested layups/dunks.
EricAnderson wrote:smartyz456 wrote:would you rather the league go back to playing a slow pace and dumping the ball to plodding 7 footers and do "post moves"
i don't
let that era stay dead
good riddance to boring post play-centered nba
So watching the beautiful footwork of a Hakeem in the post was boring but everyone hoisting 3’s is fun?
No
peja_the_legend wrote:there's no reason why a 3 point shot should be worth 50% more than a regular one.None at all.
NBA did a huge mistake adopting the gimmick ABA 3 point line back in the day and we see the disastrous consequences now.In a couple of years 70 3 point shots taken by a team will look nornmal.
EricAnderson wrote:smartyz456 wrote:would you rather the league go back to playing a slow pace and dumping the ball to plodding 7 footers and do "post moves"
i don't
let that era stay dead
good riddance to boring post play-centered nba
So watching the beautiful footwork of a Hakeem in the post was boring but everyone hoisting 3’s is fun?
No
Gooner wrote:It's a circus, basketball is not mathematics. You have to take those mid range shots to control the rhytm of the game. You have teams like Indiana and Spurs, that take many mid range shots, and they are succesfull.
Duke4life831 wrote:EricAnderson wrote:smartyz456 wrote:would you rather the league go back to playing a slow pace and dumping the ball to plodding 7 footers and do "post moves"
i don't
let that era stay dead
good riddance to boring post play-centered nba
So watching the beautiful footwork of a Hakeem in the post was boring but everyone hoisting 3’s is fun?
No
You're taking an extreme example, Hakeem is an abnormality. Someone could easily flip this and say watching Steph Curry go off is boring, but watching lumbering bigs in the low post is fun?
dhsilv2 wrote:Gooner wrote:It's a circus, basketball is not mathematics. You have to take those mid range shots to control the rhytm of the game. You have teams like Indiana and Spurs, that take many mid range shots, and they are succesfull.
Well yes basketball is mathematics at the most element levels. Why people have a problem with sports being best measured in terms of math and game theory is beyond me.
smartyz456 wrote:would you rather the league go back to playing a slow pace and dumping the ball to plodding 7 footers and do "post moves"
i don't
let that era stay dead
good riddance to boring post play-centered nba
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
G35 wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:Gooner wrote:It's a circus, basketball is not mathematics. You have to take those mid range shots to control the rhytm of the game. You have teams like Indiana and Spurs, that take many mid range shots, and they are succesfull.
Well yes basketball is mathematics at the most element levels. Why people have a problem with sports being best measured in terms of math and game theory is beyond me.
Measuring a game is not the same as playing the game or watching the game.
Measuring means you are trying to employ a scientific method...which means you are getting into geek level territory. If I wanted to watch academics I would watch Discovery or the History channel. I don't understand why anyone would want to merge sports and analytics.
Analytics doesn't provide any insight anyway. It only analyzes what has happened, it is not predictive.
Sports at its basic core is about the unknown and the spirit of competition. If we relied only on analytics we would put everything into a database and let it spit out who is the champion, MVP, DPOY, etc.
Which would be extremely boring......
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:peja_the_legend wrote:there's no reason why a 3 point shot should be worth 50% more than a regular one.None at all.
NBA did a huge mistake adopting the gimmick ABA 3 point line back in the day and we see the disastrous consequences now.In a couple of years 70 3 point shots taken by a team will look nornmal.
I disagree, the shot is more difficult as seen by the shot percentages so it should be worth more.
What the NBA needs to do though is get rid of the corner three, there's no excuse for an easier shot being worth as much as the more difficult wing & top of the key threes. You can't have a closer shot with the same value, it's stupid.
smartyz456 wrote:would you rather the league go back to playing a slow pace and dumping the ball to plodding 7 footers and do "post moves"
i don't
let that era stay dead
good riddance to boring post play-centered nba
Cavsfansince84 wrote:It isn't just the 3's but the overall pendulum has swung a little too far towards offense in the last couple of years. I would guess there have been more games where a team scores over 130 points just this year than there was between 2000-2010 combined. Silver needs to give a nudge towards defense this offseason. Nothing huge but something. Eliminating the corner 3 might be the thing to do.