2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS

Moderator: G R E Y

User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#61 » by G R E Y » Tue Feb 1, 2022 2:36 am

Phreak50 wrote:Spurs would trade Murray for Simmons imo. But not anyone on the Raps.

I think they should move White and one of Landale/Eubanks.

It's a funny thing about that trade. I think Philly fans would be very happy with DJ right now but clearly Morey wasn't interested in any of our 'non star' players and it's clear as colluding day that he's holding out for Harden which is why he's so keen on offloading Harris's contract.

And I agree with gump that we are no longer as interested given DJ's improved play. He and Jakob have just about doubled their output from last season in most categories and are crucial to our defense.

It's curious about Derrick. We've waited so long to have them as the back court pair, but I also think we're ever evaluating. We may not deal him this season but I do wonder if he's not tradable at some point with Primo coming up.

Our most immediate tradable assets right now are obviously Thad, perhaps Drew, and I suspect Lonnie, though should we re-sign him to an extension first it would give us a better return (like with Derrick).
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 4,016
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#62 » by imagump1313 » Tue Feb 1, 2022 2:46 am

Raps1103 wrote:
imagump1313 wrote:
Raps1103 wrote:Raps fan here : I’m just curious if you guys know if Poetle is being Shopped at all? And if so. What do you guys think you’d need from us ? ( outside of our starting five )

would Dragic’s expiring contract be useful at all?


Poeltl is playing better and better and his contract is cheap. I think he is about as untouchable as Murray is right now.

As for Dragic, he just doesn't fit anything we want to do. Too old and too much money. Anyway, he is going to be bought out and go to Miami for nothing so I'm afraid no one is going to trade for him.


Dragic’s value is in his 19 mil expiring contract … as I clearly stated in my post ! Not in his talent ..


His expiring contract doesn't matter to anyone if they know he is going to get bought out anyway. People would be dumb to give you a box of condoms for him knowing that.......
You asked if it was useful and I told you no. It that too hard to comprehend?
MalagaBulls
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,073
And1: 2,227
Joined: Dec 15, 2013
Location: Malaga, Spain (Where the Sun shines 300 days a year))
         

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#63 » by MalagaBulls » Tue Feb 1, 2022 8:07 pm

Bulls fan, is Finney-Smith on the block? What is the asking price?
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#64 » by G R E Y » Tue Feb 1, 2022 9:14 pm

MalagaBulls wrote:Bulls fan, is Finney-Smith on the block? What is the asking price?

Hello and welcome :) Right state, wrong city. Finney-Smith plays for the Mavs.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#65 » by G R E Y » Fri Feb 4, 2022 10:45 pm

So I was watching some sports channel for highlights and Marc Stein was being interviewed. If I heard him correctly, he said TO has been trying to pursue Jakob for like three weeks (!). It's quite the cheek to try to get back the player you traded AND do so for assets YOU want to get rid of not assets we want for him.

I do love Jakob and think he fits so well with us, and as one of the best defensive bigs (with a growing passing game) on a terrific contract he's not just going to be given away. That said, I really don't think anyone is absolutely untradeable on our roster.

So to that end, it appears this is our price:
Read on Twitter


Sounds fair to me. You want one of the best defensive bigs in the game who runs in transition, is excellent in P&R, one of the top O rebounders in the game, a player who can take you where you need to be, PLUS our development put into him, but don't want to give up assets for him? Fine by us. We can use him ourselves.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#66 » by G R E Y » Mon Feb 7, 2022 6:51 pm

Read on Twitter


*middle finger emoji*

The asking price is quality young player AND first round pick.

Trade Patrick Williams or GTFO.

Also, apparently the market is quiet for Thad. Hopefully it's a good sign. When there were rumours swirling about other potential trades, none were done. Really hope we get at least a pick or two for Thad.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 4,016
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#67 » by imagump1313 » Mon Feb 7, 2022 9:44 pm

G R E Y wrote:
Read on Twitter


*middle finger emoji*

The asking price is quality young player AND first round pick.

Trade Patrick Williams or GTFO.

Also, apparently the market is quiet for Thad. Hopefully it's a good sign. When there were rumours swirling about other potential trades, none were done. Really hope we get at least a pick or two for Thad.


Future first for Poeltl? Chicago's first round pick for the next 2-3 years will be in the 20-30 range unless I'm missing some other FRP they have. I understand you gotta ask but LMAO......
LAL1947
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,383
And1: 2,621
Joined: Dec 28, 2018

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#68 » by LAL1947 » Tue Feb 8, 2022 1:52 am

Porzingis for Poeltl + Vassell + Thad Young?

PG: Murray/Jones
SG: White/Walker
SF: Keldon/Keita Bates
PF: McDermott/Zollins
CE: Porzingis/Landale
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#69 » by G R E Y » Tue Feb 8, 2022 2:27 am

LAL1947 wrote:Porzingis for Poetl + Vassell + Thad Young?

PG: Murray/Jones
SG: White/Walker
SF: Keldon/Keita Bates
PF: McDermott/Zollins
CE: Porzingis/Landale

Why would we do that? We have more depth with Jakob and Devin, both are on great contracts and we rank 9th in PPG so scoring isn't the issue, whereas Zinger isn't known as a quality defender.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
LAL1947
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,383
And1: 2,621
Joined: Dec 28, 2018

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#70 » by LAL1947 » Tue Feb 8, 2022 2:48 am

G R E Y wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:Porzingis for Poeltl + Vassell + Thad Young?

PG: Murray/Jones
SG: White/Walker
SF: Keldon/Keita Bates
PF: McDermott/Zollins
CE: Porzingis/Landale

Why would we do that? We have more depth with Jakob and Devin, both are on great contracts and we rank 9th in PPG so scoring isn't the issue, whereas Zinger isn't known as a quality defender.

Well, I'm thinking a versatile big like Porzingis could open up the floor and create more opportunity for Murray, White, Keldon, Primo, etc to shine... instead of a roll-and-cut guy like Poeltl. As far as defense goes, their DBPM and DWS are exactly the same but Porzingis has a better DRTG. Poeltl does collect more offensive rebounds (not defensive rebounds).

So Porzingis offers:
- Higher scoring (19 PPG vs 13 PPG).
- Floor-spacing as a big (5 3PA vs 0 3PA), since Murray and Keldon aren't huge 3PT threats.
- Better FT (87% vs 46%).
- Better Defensive Rating (104 vs 109 points allowed per 100 plays).
- 4 less Turnovers per 100 plays.

Basically, is Poeltl the limiting factor for the growth of the rest of the Spurs squad, when you consider their playing characteristics?

Porzingis vs Poeltl 2021-22 Comparison
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#71 » by G R E Y » Tue Feb 8, 2022 3:12 am

LAL1947 wrote:
G R E Y wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:Porzingis for Poetl + Vassell + Thad Young?

PG: Murray/Jones
SG: White/Walker
SF: Keldon/Keita Bates
PF: McDermott/Zollins
CE: Porzingis/Landale

Why would we do that? We have more depth with Jakob and Devin, both are on great contracts and we rank 9th in PPG so scoring isn't the issue, whereas Zinger isn't known as a quality defender.

I'm thinking a versatile big like Porzingis could open up the floor and create more opportunity for Murray, White, Keldon, Primo, etc to shine... instead of a roll-and-cut guy like Poeltl. As far as defense goes, their DBPM and DWS are exactly the same but Porzingis has a better DRTG. Poeltl does collect more rebounds (offensive, not defensive).

So Porzingis offers:
- Floor-spacing (5 3PA vs 0 3PA).
- Better FT (87% vs 46%).
- Better Defensive Rating (104 vs 109 points allowed per 100 plays).
- 4 less Turnovers per 100 plays.

Basically, is Poeltl the limiting factor for the growth of the rest of the Spurs squad

[urlhttps://stathead.com/basketball/pcm_finder.cgi?player_id2=poeltja01&p1yrfrom=2022&player_id1=porzikr01&p2yrfrom=2022&sum=0&request=1]Porzingis vs Poeltl 2021-22 Comparison[/url]

I mean Pop has a longer history with Cs and bigs who don't stretch the floor than with ones who do.

Yes Jakob doesn't stretch the floor in terms of 3s, but he's often at the top of the arc either screening, passing or giving DHOs. Plus he does screen and pop it's just a lot closer than the arc obviously. It's still an effective pop-a-shot set up by all the times he does roll.

Of course Zinger is a far more polished O player. And yes the FT% is indefensible (though January through to Feb I think Jakob is over 50% - still, everyone agrees this is a very weird negative outlier).

But despite these, he's doubled every major category in terms of statistical improvement in his first full year as starter, and is frankly our second most improved and important player after Dejounte. We have a poor record without Jakob in the lineup.

The stats you provide also have to do with who each player is surrounded by. We don't really have a true PF. Doug McBuckets plays the role, and he has been a PF the last couple of years, but was a SF for most of his career. Jakob often ends up having to play two positions defensively and he's excellent at it. He's mobile, great blocker and rim protector, screen assist provider, and rebounder. Also terrific in finishing at the rim, P&R, pick and pop.

Each of the players you mention are already having career years. And we just got Collins back who provides the D, rim protection and floor spacing looks that we don't have with Jakob at a far more reasonable contract than Zinger's.

Also, and this is just a personal thing, Zinger's past with beating the crap out of his GF then paying for facial reconstructive surgery of whatever it was really rubs me the wrong way. I know it has nothing to do with anything, they worked it out between them apparently, and we even tried to trade for him despite all of these details (maybe they came out after, I don't recall) but it's a huge turn off, and if it came out after we tried to trade for him, perhaps PATFO feels like they dodged one. Just goes against the type of guys we usually have in the locker room. Again, talent wins out and usually a good locker room can absorb a couple of guys who aren't of the boy scout end of the mold, but still, it's just more of a personal bias...

To sum up, Jakob has expanded his game, and despite limitations, he's very important to what we do going forward. He and Devin are part of the young group - not that nobody is untradable; in fact, the reported price for Jakob is a quality young player and a first round pick - but unless we get that back, I think we'd rather not invest so much more money for some upgrades.

Zinger hasn't really shown he's the main go-to guy anywhere he's been so that's also a factor (as are his injury and stamina history).

Also, I hope we get something back for Thad separate from including our young guys for a floor stretching big on a huge contract.

Basically, this deal helps the Mavs way more than it does us. Plus PATFO are said to love Devin so it would shock me if we traded him at this point.

Just an overall no, but good sharing ideas with you.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#72 » by G R E Y » Tue Feb 8, 2022 3:50 am

OH and this was mentioned earlier as well:

Read on Twitter


Interesting! *raises eyebrow*

But since we know about this it probably won't happen. Anyway, I do like that we're being proactive in upgrading the roster. Frankly, I'd go after whichever one cost us fewer assets.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 4,016
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#73 » by imagump1313 » Tue Feb 8, 2022 5:45 am

LAL1947 wrote:Porzingis for Poeltl + Vassell + Thad Young?

PG: Murray/Jones
SG: White/Walker
SF: Keldon/Keita Bates
PF: McDermott/Zollins
CE: Porzingis/Landale



You also have to remember it's Dallas. There are certain teams, Dallas, Lakers...etc the Spurs will never trade with unless its a totally lopsided deal in our favor..
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#74 » by G R E Y » Tue Feb 8, 2022 10:49 pm

Some more trade whispers:
Read on Twitter


New team interested in Jakob: Hornets

New team interested in Thad: Wolves

Interesting as well that the Suns are STILL apparently interested with that Saric, Smith, and 2nd round pick offer.

Read the link about the Smith issue since the Suns didn't pick up his option for next year.

Basically we'd risk losing Smith (if we intended to keep him), the Saric contract cuts into next season's cap space, all for a 2nd round pick.

The Wolves offer of Taurean Prince, a 6'7" SF/PF who can hit a 3, and a 2nd round pick is interesting. He's from SA but reportedly seeks a buyout if he's traded. His contract is also up after this season so we wouldn't be cutting into next season's cap space.

Thad is a vet but still very serviceable. This isn't a Carroll situation.

I wonder if we can try to use two competing teams to pry a first round pick? I wonder if we're trying to stock up on the firsts to have tried to pry Turner from Indy. Their asking price was reportedly two firsts along with whichever players teams decided upon per Jake Fischer (I know that's huge, it's just no players have been mentioned, and my point now isn't to speculate about it).

We were reportedly interested in both Sabonis and Turner, but also now that the Pacers have traded for Haliburton, Turner is said to be thrilled about playing the 5 again and with Haliburton as the PG. So perhaps that's now out of the equation?

Even if we don't / aren't going after Turner, we're clearly seeking compensation for Thad that includes pick(s) but without cutting into our cap space.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 4,016
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#75 » by imagump1313 » Wed Feb 9, 2022 1:07 am

G R E Y wrote:Interesting as well that the Suns are STILL apparently interested with that Saric, Smith, and 2nd round pick offer.

Read the link about the Smith issue since the Suns didn't pick up his option for next year.

Basically we'd risk losing Smith (if we intended to keep him), the Saric contract cuts into next season's cap space, all for a 2nd round pick.

The Wolves offer of Taurean Prince, a 6'7" SF/PF who can hit a 3, and a 2nd round pick is interesting. He's from SA but reportedly seeks a buyout if he's traded. His contract is also up after this season so we wouldn't be cutting into next season's cap space.


We've come all this way. If we waste any cap space at all at this point to get a 2nd round pick I'll be pissed. Saric was trash when Philadelphia was trying to dump him on us and now he's injured and three years older.

Prince is a little younger than Young but would be gone at the end of the year just like Thad. Again, all for a 2nd round pick? The objective here is to make the San Antonio Spurs good, not the Austin Spurs.

If there is no market for Young then there is no market. :( I still cant believe we couldn't have gotten at least something for him when everyone was short players with covid two months ago.

I know the prize isn't the players we get in return. I just don't consider 2nd round picks as assets.
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#76 » by G R E Y » Wed Feb 9, 2022 1:52 am

imagump1313 wrote:
G R E Y wrote:Interesting as well that the Suns are STILL apparently interested with that Saric, Smith, and 2nd round pick offer.

Read the link about the Smith issue since the Suns didn't pick up his option for next year.

Basically we'd risk losing Smith (if we intended to keep him), the Saric contract cuts into next season's cap space, all for a 2nd round pick.

The Wolves offer of Taurean Prince, a 6'7" SF/PF who can hit a 3, and a 2nd round pick is interesting. He's from SA but reportedly seeks a buyout if he's traded. His contract is also up after this season so we wouldn't be cutting into next season's cap space.


We've come all this way. If we waste any cap space at all at this point to get a 2nd round pick I'll be pissed. Saric was trash when Philadelphia was trying to dump him on us and now he's injured and three years older.

Prince is a little younger than Young but would be gone at the end of the year just like Thad. Again, all for a 2nd round pick? The objective here is to make the San Antonio Spurs good, not the Austin Spurs.

If there is no market for Young then there is no market. :( I still cant believe we couldn't have gotten at least something for him when everyone was short players with covid two months ago.

I know the prize isn't the players we get in return. I just don't consider 2nd round picks as assets.

Well teams do get quality players in the second round. We've benefited from it ourselves. But it is more of a crap shoot for sure.

The consistent pattern over the last 2+ or so years is teams trying to offload their bad contracts along with higher picks (1st rounders) in exchange for our players. It happened a couple of years ago when both LMA and DD were rumoured to have interest from other teams at the trade deadline, it happened when LMA and the Spurs decided to part ways, it even happened during the DD S&T -- and that was the only time we reportedly were considering taking on a longer contract with Lauri first reportedly being the return.

And still we got a good couple of contracts AND three picks from that S&T. Anyway you look at it, that's already favourable.

I think teams think of us as vulnerable and see the acquisition of DD originally as a turning point of doing things differently perhaps, like if they wait us out they'll get an advantage and force us to take what we don't want, rather than that being an outlier deal in terms of the assets we took back, and even then, we still got that favourable contract with the AS/prospect/pick requirement.

It goes to show that 1. we have a direction but have flexibility within it (ie/ we would have traded either of LMA or DD had our prices been met) 2. we will only cut into the cap space for the select players we seek 3. yes buyouts are better than cutting into cap space for just a 2nd rounder. 4. 2nd rounders are valuable in terms of asset collection for the right price, again, friendly contracts if we aren't getting a player we really seek.

So if we get another 2nd round pick for Thad (hopefully more) we can consolidate those for other picks or prospects in trades.

Tick tock tick tock...
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 4,016
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#77 » by imagump1313 » Wed Feb 9, 2022 9:50 pm

So we got another 2nd rounder and poor Thad is still trapped here LOL.
The Jazz are a contender so Thad must not want to go there and is holding out for Phoenix. Or we are still holding out that we can still get something a little better for Thad because he is a much better player than Hernangomez.
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#78 » by G R E Y » Wed Feb 9, 2022 10:11 pm

So long, Juancho! We hardly knew ya! Thanks for the few O boards, pretty sound D, and some good passes. Most of all, thanks for the extra cap space and the extra second pick you've provided:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


Short-term goals:
Read on Twitter


Long-term goals:
Read on Twitter


Asset acquisition mode:
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
G R E Y
Senior Mod - Spurs
Senior Mod - Spurs
Posts: 53,000
And1: 40,429
Joined: Mar 17, 2010
Location: Silver and Black
 

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#79 » by G R E Y » Wed Feb 9, 2022 10:19 pm

imagump1313 wrote:So we got another 2nd rounder and poor Thad is still trapped here LOL.
The Jazz are a contender so Thad must not want to go there and is holding out for Phoenix. Or we are still holding out that we can still get something a little better for Thad because he is a much better player than Hernangomez.

Sato makes just shy of $3M more than Juancho, so we re-signed Bryn for now more than twice his expiring, now at $10M. AND Bryn alone has also netted us two 2nd round picks. Useful!

Perhaps we needed to do this deal to combine with Thad's? Perhaps we did it to offset a Thad buyout - it's a way of getting the 2nd round pick we were offered from two teams but this one was preferrable? Or we liked taking a look at another guard, this one a 6'7". Sato I recall was solid for his Olympic team, but we'll see if/how he plays for us.

Anyway, this is shrewd cap and asset management regardless of what we do with Thad, which I hope is something useful...

We clearly have increasing cap space as a priority.
ImageImageImage
The Spurs Way Ever Onward

#XX
User avatar
imagump1313
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 4,016
Joined: Apr 27, 2013
Location: Behind You
       

Re: 2021-2022 SPURS TRADE DEADLINE RUMOURS AND DEALS 

Post#80 » by imagump1313 » Wed Feb 9, 2022 11:58 pm

G R E Y wrote:
imagump1313 wrote:So we got another 2nd rounder and poor Thad is still trapped here LOL.
The Jazz are a contender so Thad must not want to go there and is holding out for Phoenix. Or we are still holding out that we can still get something a little better for Thad because he is a much better player than Hernangomez.

Sato makes just shy of $3M more than Juancho, so we re-signed Bryn for now more than twice his expiring, now at $10M. AND Bryn alone has also netted us two 2nd round picks. Useful!

Perhaps we needed to do this deal to combine with Thad's? Perhaps we did it to offset a Thad buyout - it's a way of getting the 2nd round pick we were offered from two teams but this one was preferrable? Or we liked taking a look at another guard, this one a 6'7". Sato I recall was solid for his Olympic team, but we'll see if/how he plays for us.

Anyway, this is shrewd cap and asset management regardless of what we do with Thad, which I hope is something useful...

We clearly have increasing cap space as a priority.


This is what I am unsure of.
If I'm the Jazz, I'm asking for Thad. I know he makes a tiny bit more than Hernangomez but he is also a much better player. I doubt the Jazz are worried about a million or two of cap space. So did Utah ask for Thad and we said no? Kinda ballsy if we did because we still look good in this deal even if Thad was involved instead. A buyout of Thad would have been more expensive than a buyout of Hernangomez also.
Does Thad still insist on Phoenix and we know we have some other deal in the works with them so we said Hernangomez or nothing? Are we sentencing Thad to bench hell until the season is over? I'm sure we will find out soon enough.

Return to San Antonio Spurs