Kilroy wrote:Landsberger wrote:This franchise isn't a coach away from relevance again....  it's an ownership group away.   A broken down LeBron at the end of his career and Davis with no picks and few assets isn't going to magically turn into a championship run with the highest compensated coach in the NBA.  It's actually more proof that the ownership group is grasping at straws, name recognition and eyeballs over substantive team building.
No they aren't....  But the first step in achieving real relevance has to involve a cultural shift...  Yes, we seem to need an ownership change too, but assuming the idea is to give Hurley a lot of personnel authority, maybe that's the first step in getting the ownership to take a step back?
Also, with the way the league is constructed, with a bit of a talent gap between the best players and the rank and file, it would seem embracing player development would be the best way to find a transcendent star to build a future contender around....
So I'm team Hurly too...
But I'm still betting it's going to be JJ...
That said, if getting Hurly, is really about nurturing Brony and by extension, placating papa-lebron...  I might have to burn the rest of my Lakers gear...
 
LeBron is brokering he and his kid.... either here or somewhere else.   We've done that side show before with Ball and Ball was 3x the player.  
The odds we get a healthy Davis and Bron for as much time as we did this year is nill.   
Player development... by that do you mean trading someone of value to get rid of Russell or trying to fix him?  He ain't fixable.  
I think coaches can mean something when the team is close.  I'm not seeing the team as close.   
College coaches coming into the one and done NBA find things considerably different.  We'll see.