DOT wrote:I feel like 2013 is the apt comparison
No true superstar at the top, best players are gonna be taken in the mid-late 1st, and a bunch of guys are gonna end up sticking around for a solid 8-10 years
Big difference is probably no Giannis level superstar emerges from the middle of the 1st, but you never know, nobody thought 2013 was gonna have a Giannis level player either
But I guess that depends on how exactly you define a class as being bad though, cause 2000 is probably the standard of a bad class, only 3 All Stars each with only 1 appearance, meanwhile 2013 only had 3 All Stars but you have a 2x MVP (and 1x DPOY) and a 4x DPOY player in there
Basically, this is a bad year to have the #1 overall pick.
k, I'll put you down for Tier 8. Thanks



