Mr Puddles wrote:SelfishPlayer wrote:Mr Puddles wrote:
That's not what people mean when they say that the US is a country of immigrants lol. The US is one of the most difficult countries to immigrate to. I know people who went to ivy league schools and decided to leave the US because it was too difficult to get a work visa.
The majority of the country is descendent from immigrants, some of the first presidents didn't even have English as their first language. That's why the US is referred to as a nation of immigrants. Not because the country is so welcoming towards immigrants in present day America.
There are US Governers that are immigrants! The difficulty of immigration means nothing, there are millions of new US citizens and millions of immigrants every single year.
"Interview: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Author Of 'Total Recall' | From Immigrant To Governor"
https://www.npr.org/transcripts/162166295
A vast number of countries has immigrants in governemental positions. If anything, in France embiid could theoretically become prime minister whereas in the US he couldn't. Just like Arnold could never become more than a governor, even if he wanted to become president. So applying your governement argument, France has more of a claim to the "nation of immigrants" title than the US does.
Unfortunately for you, this doesn't change the reason why the US is referred to as a nation of immigrants, which, again, is because the majority of people are decented from immigrants and not in fact native American.
Embiid is a citizen in a country that is referred to as a nation of immigrants, where immigrants can serve office in government, and you are singling him out as a immigrant? How dare you conduct a failed thought experiment of trying to deny him inclusion.

















