ImageImageImageImageImage

Trade Targets

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#641 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jan 4, 2013 9:05 pm

DarkXaero wrote:
Zach Lowe ‏@ZachLowe_NBA
Memphis has had recent conversations w/ other teams about trading Rudy Gay. What deals might work?


Interesting.

I'm pretty disappointed in Rudy Gay.

He's never consistently put it all together and hasn't been that close to reaching his potential.

He'll put together a few good weeks and then you think "he's finally going to get it".

Nope.

I'd only want him as a 3rd option cuz he's too flaky as a first or second option.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#642 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jan 4, 2013 9:12 pm

Crash/Brooks/salary filler/1st for Gay. Do it.

I don't love Gay and Wallace has been a great glue guy and solid leader, but that's a deal I think you have to do.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#643 » by jeff1624 » Fri Jan 4, 2013 9:19 pm

On value alone that deal would need to be done if it were proposed by Memphis. Marshon sucks, our 1st will be in the early 20's and Gerald Wallace is an injury risk anytime he steps on the court...

That being said, we'd be a worse team overall. Rudy Gay will encourage more ISO plays and does little else besides scoring (inefficiently)... he is younger though and has more value than Crash, Marshon or our first which is why i'd do the trade.
Dat Leadership
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#644 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jan 4, 2013 9:27 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:Crash/Brooks/salary filler/1st for Gay. Do it.

I don't love Gay and Wallace has been a great glue guy and solid leader, but that's a deal I think you have to do.

What about our defense though?

Yes, we'd be pretty lethal offensively, but our defense would go.

PROs:
Crash is older and he's bound to lose some time and athleticism due to his bold but reckless playing style.
We get younger and more athletic.

CONs:
Gay has significantly larger contract.
Gay's defense is quite suspect.

Also, we have no idea how Rudy would play as a the 3rd option.

We've already got a plenty of scoring offense on this team and I don't know if it makes a lot of sense to pay that much for a guy who really won't provide us what we need: PnR/PnP & 3pt scoring.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#645 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jan 4, 2013 9:32 pm

jeff1624 wrote:On value alone that deal would need to be done if it were proposed by Memphis. Marshon sucks, our 1st will be in the early 20's and Gerald Wallace is an injury risk anytime he steps on the court...

That being said, we'd be a worse team overall. Rudy Gay will encourage more ISO plays and does little else besides scoring (inefficiently)... he is younger though and has more value than Crash, Marshon or our first which is why i'd do the trade.

Agreed.

What if we expand it to a 3 team deal? There could be a better fit for us someplace else.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#646 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jan 4, 2013 9:43 pm

Here's the thing:

1. Gay is a solid defender.

2. This team is not winning a chip as is and even in the snowball chance in hell we did it would mean Lopez dropped a 26/12/3/3 playoffs while Deron played at his top 7 level, JJ turned back the clock 3 years and fit with everyone and every other little thing fell into place. Therefore, I think we get caught up too much in fit. Not saying to deal for just anyone, but this is a move I'd make on the upside and youth alone.

3. Gay provides an athletic shooter with length to aid with spacing.

4. Although as unlikely as it is, maybe Gay turns a corner again.

5. If we ever do get Phil Jackson, Gay is the type of player he can turn around and mold into a triangle beast.

6. Allows us to upgrade while keeping Hump's contract.

7. Wallace is a lot more injury prone.

8. We've seen Gay as a 3rd option, he sort of still is and he works fine in that role.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Jersey Generals
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,447
And1: 414
Joined: May 19, 2008

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#647 » by Jersey Generals » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:13 pm

I would actually look to see if Humphries can be outgoing, with Wallace staying, with the intention of playing Wallace at the 4 when it situationally is available (the Heat).

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Wallace
Lopez

Sixth: Evans

or

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Evans
Lopez

Sixth: Wallace
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#648 » by jeff1624 » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:14 pm

Daequan Cook just cleared waivers. Any interest?
Dat Leadership
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#649 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:16 pm

Jersey Generals wrote:I would actually look to see if Humphries can be outgoing, with Wallace staying, with the intention of playing Wallace at the 4 when it situationally is available (the Heat).

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Wallace
Lopez

Sixth: Evans

or

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Evans
Lopez

Sixth: Wallace

I can dig.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
AntwanBoldin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,937
And1: 70
Joined: Jul 22, 2011

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#650 » by AntwanBoldin » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:33 pm

NyCeEvO wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:Crash/Brooks/salary filler/1st for Gay. Do it.

I don't love Gay and Wallace has been a great glue guy and solid leader, but that's a deal I think you have to do.

What about our defense though?

Yes, we'd be pretty lethal offensively, but our defense would go.

PROs:
Crash is older and he's bound to lose some time and athleticism due to his bold but reckless playing style.
We get younger and more athletic.

CONs:
Gay has significantly larger contract.
Gay's defense is quite suspect.

Also, we have no idea how Rudy would play as a the 3rd option.

We've already got a plenty of scoring offense on this team and I don't know if it makes a lot of sense to pay that much for a guy who really won't provide us what we need: PnR/PnP & 3pt scoring.




If you locked Gerald Wallace in a gym overnight by morning he'd have 4 points.

But still he sets a tone that gay doesn't. Swapping them straight up be would be awful. Jj would be even more underused on offense and our D would be so soft.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#651 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:39 pm

Jersey Generals wrote:I would actually look to see if Humphries can be outgoing, with Wallace staying, with the intention of playing Wallace at the 4 when it situationally is available (the Heat).

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Wallace
Lopez

Sixth: Evans

or

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Evans
Lopez

Sixth: Wallace

Why would MEM have any incentive to accept Hump for Gay.

At least if they get Wallace, they get a cheaper, defensive player who actually adds value to their team.

Hump doesn't do much much for them except cap space and they'll already be over the cap anyway.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#652 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:39 pm

AntwanBoldin wrote:If you locked Gerald Wallace in a gym overnight by morning he'd have 4 points.

:lol:
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#653 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:43 pm

NyCeEvO wrote:
AntwanBoldin wrote:If you locked Gerald Wallace in a gym overnight by morning he'd have 4 points.

:lol:

That was funny, but he brings up the obvious point that we were saying.

Can Gay fit with JJ? Because JJ is unmovable lol.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,559
And1: 16,112
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#654 » by therealbig3 » Fri Jan 4, 2013 10:44 pm

jeff1624 wrote:Daequan Cook just cleared waivers. Any interest?


I'm interested. He's a very good shooter. We need someone like him to space the floor off the bench. Bogans sometimes spaces the floor, and sometimes doesn't.

BTW, I'd much rather move Humphries for Gay instead of Wallace. Wallace and Gay as the forwards would be different, and would actually work well imo. We'd struggle on the glass, I feel, but our defense would be a lot better, and we'd be a much better offensive team. But yeah, we'd give up a lot of offensive rebounds, but that's a tradeoff I'd take, especially if Lopez works harder on the glass, and we adopt a "gang rebound" mentality, where everyone crashes the defensive glass.
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#655 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jan 4, 2013 11:03 pm

therealbig3 wrote:
jeff1624 wrote:Daequan Cook just cleared waivers. Any interest?


I'm interested. He's a very good shooter. We need someone like him to space the floor off the bench. Bogans sometimes spaces the floor, and sometimes doesn't.

BTW, I'd much rather move Humphries for Gay instead of Wallace. Wallace and Gay as the forwards would be different, and would actually work well imo. We'd struggle on the glass, I feel, but our defense would be a lot better, and we'd be a much better offensive team. But yeah, we'd give up a lot of offensive rebounds, but that's a tradeoff I'd take, especially if Lopez works harder on the glass, and we adopt a "gang rebound" mentality, where everyone crashes the defensive glass.

Really?

Cooks numbers look pretty bad.

He's only had two seasons where he's shot pretty good from 3 and one where he was above 40%.

Yes, he's cheap but there's gotta be a way that we can get a better and more consistent 3pt shooter via a small trade.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,559
And1: 16,112
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#656 » by therealbig3 » Fri Jan 4, 2013 11:23 pm

Cook's entire career has been built off being a 3pt shooter.

His career percentage is 36.5%. He's not super-duper elite, but he's quite good. And he's not someone who will get a lot of playing time, just 10-12 mpg in order to space the floor and hit a 3 once in a while.
User avatar
N Ireland Nets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,618
And1: 276
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
         

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#657 » by N Ireland Nets » Fri Jan 4, 2013 11:51 pm

Jersey Generals wrote:I would actually look to see if Humphries can be outgoing, with Wallace staying, with the intention of playing Wallace at the 4 when it situationally is available (the Heat).

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Wallace
Lopez

Sixth: Evans

or

Williams
Johnson
Gay
Evans
Lopez

Sixth: Wallace


I would kill to be able to bring in Gay for Hump & pieces.

I just don't see how we'd get Memphis to bite without including Wallace.

Williams
JJ
Gay
Wallace
Lopez

Lineup is legit and I would love it. We'd be fluid from SG-PF with match up nightmares everywhere.

But I just don't see how we get him with Hump & not Wallace, any ideas?
Image
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,559
And1: 16,112
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#658 » by therealbig3 » Fri Jan 4, 2013 11:56 pm

Well I'm assuming that Memphis wants to get out of Gay's max contract, and they don't really seem to need him anyway. Humphries makes less money and expires in 1.5 years. Wallace, otoh, is signed for another 3.5 years. Don't know if Memphis wants to make that commitment to him.

But then again, Memphis is a win-now team, and Wallace is obviously a team that any contender would love to have, and you know he would do what Memphis probably wanted Gay to do: don't worry about offense and focus on defense. Wallace and Allen on the perimeter together would be a nightmare for opposing offenses...but they would also be a nightmare for Memphis's offense.
User avatar
N Ireland Nets
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,618
And1: 276
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
         

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#659 » by N Ireland Nets » Sat Jan 5, 2013 12:10 am

therealbig3 wrote:Well I'm assuming that Memphis wants to get out of Gay's max contract, and they don't really seem to need him anyway. Humphries makes less money and expires in 1.5 years. Wallace, otoh, is signed for another 3.5 years. Don't know if Memphis wants to make that commitment to him.

But then again, Memphis is a win-now team, and Wallace is obviously a team that any contender would love to have, and you know he would do what Memphis probably wanted Gay to do: don't worry about offense and focus on defense. Wallace and Allen on the perimeter together would be a nightmare for opposing offenses...but they would also be a nightmare for Memphis's offense.


I'd love to send Hump, Brooks & 2 1st's for Rudy Gay. Would be a fantastic signing if we were able to keep Wallace.
Image
User avatar
NjNeTs1029
Starter
Posts: 2,408
And1: 98
Joined: Jan 28, 2007
   

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#660 » by NjNeTs1029 » Sat Jan 5, 2013 12:11 am

I don't think Memphis would take Crash for Gay. They would probably look to get a scorer back for him. They're already starting Tony Allen. I don't think theyd want to start Allen at the 2 and Crash at the 3.. The only scoring threat in that lineup would be Randolph.

I would def like to get Rudy Gay on the Nets but i don't think we have much to move for him. I'd rather trade our assets for a legit starting 4.

Return to Brooklyn Nets