sabonis wrote:fraanciiscoo wrote:sabonis wrote:yeah right. you didn't call anything at the time, so it means it probably is close to a fair deal. now since I called your deal lopsided, you are just attacking blindly. no thanks fran, not falling for that.
can you guess why i didnt said anything ?

Don't kid yourself. you always comment on trades if it favors one side heavily, always.
btw I thought the deal was already agreed for on the boards, that's why I commented so harshly. Did not intend to affect WB in any way. Sorry.
Francisco santos <dv1982prt@gmail.com>
26/09 (há 1 dia)
para Jeremy, Jeremy
Klay + Monta + 217 + 257 + 264
for
Rubio + Parsons + 135 + 161 + 175
Jfrost 146 215 217 240 255 257 264 266
Fran 143 160 226 227 241 254 268
now lets talk about monta and beal
Imagem intercalada 1
Like i said : I would offer
beal 226 241 for monta 254 266
but i going to upgrade and make two new offers
beal 226 227 241 for monta 255 264 266
beal 160 241 254 268 for monta 215 217 240
thoughts
Jeremy Frost 26/09 (há 1 dia)
First thing first… what do you think of the deal? Did i way overpay? > <image...
Francisco santos <dv1982prt@gmail.com>
26/09 (há 1 dia)
para Jeremy
not at all
kay is top 20 nice all round % s 3pts pts stl nice to
Obv monta doesnt fit due to the bad ft and no 3pt and high to but i think you knew you would get beal
so beal and klay fit great together imo 140-175 is picks that you try to get a guy thats is on the way down but you think he have upside or a rookie / 2nd / 3rd year that you think it might work
look
i going to pick stats from the two vs what you traded
Francisco santos <dv1982prt@gmail.com>
26/09 (há 1 dia)
para Jeremy
Imagem intercalada 1
LOL you only lose a litle in reb and alot in ast and stl but you win in the other 6 six !!! cats !!! what a idiot AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
BUT you take a injury way risk guy in rubio and a guy that is inj right now in parsons
VETO TRADE one side