Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Newz · Post #6641 » by **Newz** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:17 pm

KidA_24 wrote:This is my favorite, albeit unrealistic, trade proposal: http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=laahahy

Bucks get: Lawson, Nurkic
Nugs get: Knight, Henson, Ersan, Bucks 2015 1st, Clips 2017 1st

I don't think its enough for the Nuggets. Is there a way of getting there without including Jabannis?? Include Middleton? More picks?

I think the odds that we can get Nurkic without trading Giannis are 0... and obviously we aren't trading Giannis.

Post #6642 » by **paulpressey25** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:18 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/Lockedonsports/status/568443349922758657[/tweet]

Sauce Boss · Post #6643 » by **Sauce Boss** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:18 pm

yoyomayoma wrote:I really REALLY hope we don't trade for Lopez.

Unless there is a Robin Lopez rumor I didn't hear about, we can't trade with the Nets per acquiring Jason Kidd as our coach in the offseason. We can't trade with them for one year, so sometime in late summer we can talk Nets deals again.

Post #6644 » by **ReasonablySober** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:18 pm

yoyomayoma wrote:I really REALLY hope we don't trade for Lopez.

Don't worry, we can't because of the Kidd agreement.

Cooleyo47 · Post #6645 » by **Cooleyo47** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:19 pm

JayMKE wrote:nothing is better than something dumb

Ain't that the truth

EastSideBucksFan · Post #6646 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:19 pm

Giannis Parker wrote:
Garden Of Edens wrote:So how can Okc afford Lopez? Could the Bucks then trade for Lopez since he was traded away from Brooklyn or are they not allowed to touch any Nets players for a certain amount of years

Pretty sure it is no deals with the Nets, not the players. Would be awfully hard to prove that the intent all along was not to trade Lopez to the Bucks and the Thunder just acted as a third party.

Lopez is still considered a Nets asset.

I don't think the Bucks can take on any players that are coming from the Nets.

ackypoo · Post #6647 » by **ackypoo** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:19 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:I honestly don't think that Clips pick has a ton of value.

it has little to no value.

Cooleyo47 · Post #6648 » by **Cooleyo47** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:20 pm

If reports are true, sellers sure haven't lowered their asking price yet. Multiple picks for Wilson Chandler?!

yoyomayoma · Post #6649 » by **yoyomayoma** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:21 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
yoyomayoma wrote:I really REALLY hope we don't trade for Lopez.

Don't worry, we can't because of the Kidd agreement.

I know we can't directly trade with the Nets. Someone asked if the Thunder traded for Lopez could we trade for him afterward. I doubt that's allowed either but he's not a good fit for our core anyway.

DanoMac · Post #6650 » by **DanoMac** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:23 pm

GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
DanoMac wrote:
It's not realistic to explore trades for guys who are about enter RFA looking for a big contract? #2 or #3 scoring threat, you're absolutely right!

I'll propose as many trades as I like, especially on deadline day. Just because your favorite player is involved doesn't mean you need to get upset.

argue with fans that a guy isn't capable of being a #3.... and then on the same page of the same thread propose a deal with a contender asking for a monster return for their new #3.

Christ sakes... keep up the good work

Lmao @ "monster return". If Beverley/Jones/2nd is a "monster return" for Knight, aren't you yourself admitting Knight isn't that good? You crack me up GOS.

Enjoy the deadline. I'm just a poster on a message board that proposed a trade. Don't make it a bigger deal than it really is.

BobbyLight · Post #6651 » by **BobbyLight** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:24 pm

I feel like a whole lot of nothing is going to happen today. Like, anywhere. Hope I'm wrong because I always love seeing trades for one reason or another.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #6652 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:25 pm

Once this big OKC, BKN, MN deal emerges we should see the rest of the dominoes fall.

Glad to see Reggie Jax is taken out of the mix for the Bucks.

All quiet on the Kanter front for right now.

3.5 hours to go.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #6653 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:27 pm

Afflalo to POR per Woj.

Not sure on compensation.

pe_it72 · Post #6654 » by **pe_it72** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:27 pm

Would love to see what has been offered for Knight. Just the curiosity in me.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #6655 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:28 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/568446764681986049[/tweet]

yoyomayoma · Post #6656 » by **yoyomayoma** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:28 pm

EastSideBucksFan wrote:Afflalo to POR per Woj.

Not sure on compensation.

Barton, Claver, first and second for Afflalo and Gee. That is a lot for a guy who can opt out this summer.

buckboy · Post #6657 » by **buckboy** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:29 pm

KidA_24 wrote:This is my favorite, albeit unrealistic, trade proposal: http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=laahahy

Bucks get: Lawson, Nurkic
Nugs get: Knight, Henson, Ersan, Bucks 2015 1st, Clips 2017 1st

I don't think its enough for the Nuggets. Is there a way of getting there without including Jabannis?? Include Middleton? More picks?

I think if you offered Parker for Nurkic they'd say no.

mlloyd10 · Post #6658 » by **mlloyd10** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:30 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/568446880113401856[/tweet]

Wisky3 · Post #6659 » by **Wisky3** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:31 pm

pe_it72 wrote:Would love to see what has been offered for Knight. Just the curiosity in me.

I really am glad we can't. You see/remember the uproar when we could have had Curry instead of Monta. I wish that would have never been public knowledge.

Dcebucks11 · Post #6660 » by **Dcebucks11** » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:32 pm

lottery protected 1st, thomas rob, claver, and barton for afflalo.. denver made out good