ImageImage

Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
Magic Giannison
RealGM
Posts: 27,848
And1: 27,302
Joined: Aug 08, 2014
   

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#681 » by Magic Giannison » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:43 am

His own teammate went full speed JFC that is dangerous
jazzfanWA
Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2018-2019
Posts: 1,542
And1: 362
Joined: Oct 28, 2013

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#682 » by jazzfanWA » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:43 am

Dejavu. No defense and key injuries.
Touchpass
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,262
And1: 310
Joined: Apr 16, 2011
Location: Blow it up.

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#683 » by Touchpass » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:43 am

If players ever got back to tackling instead of launching themselves like missiles it would probably help reduce the amount of injuries.
User avatar
MissKhriddleton
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,330
And1: 3,655
Joined: Nov 03, 2015
 

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#684 » by MissKhriddleton » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:44 am

They need helmets that restrict all head, neck movement.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,241
And1: 27,886
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#685 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:44 am

dedned wrote:The helmets have to be worse than back in the day. I don't remember MFs dying when taking a shot to the head.


I think the problem is players think they're more protected than they actually are so they're totally reckless with their tackling. You don't see stuff like this in rugby or Aussie Rules Football where it still involves physical play and tackling but no helmets are used.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
kaulkhara15
Starter
Posts: 2,325
And1: 678
Joined: Sep 14, 2009

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#686 » by kaulkhara15 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:44 am

TroyD92 wrote:What is that small group of fans trying to chant ?


Pretty sure I heard “joe buck sucks” lol
User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,601
And1: 3,252
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#687 » by LittleRooster » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:44 am

Just came in to say if we score, we should go for two


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,849
And1: 13,566
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#688 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 am

Does it normally take this long? Seems like they are being really cautious.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,512
And1: 7,063
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#689 » by XtremeDunkz » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 am

Gotta run at least once to drain the clock

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
User avatar
dedned
Analyst
Posts: 3,737
And1: 1,480
Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Location: nowhere
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#690 » by dedned » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 am

MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Does it normally take this long? Seems like they are being really cautious.

He ded
Image
User avatar
MoMM
RealGM
Posts: 10,593
And1: 1,779
Joined: Jan 08, 2002
Location: Brazilian in Barcelona
Contact:
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#691 » by MoMM » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 am

BUCKnation wrote:
MoMM wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
There's basically no difference between a 7 or 8 point lead, it's still a one possession game. Getting it up to 9 makes it a two possession game and there's no disadvantage because if you don't make it you're still up by a TD and extra point.

Well, but a 8-point game forces the other team to score a TD and try a 2-point conversion to tie it, I'd say it's better than a TD + extra point.

PS: I'm not a specialist, just a Packers long time fan trying to better learn the game.

2 pt conversions are converted about 60%, probably higher with someone like Rodgers, despite the earlier incompetence at the goal line. XP's are only converted at like 90%. Tying the game in a 9 pt deficit in one possession is 0%. Like I said before it's just simply the reward is far greater than the risk. It may have been a bit early, but imagine a 9 pt lead for the Eagles right now.

I thought that 2pt conversions were lower, kind of 30%. Thanks for the information.

After this, I think teams should try 2pt conversion more, because out of 10 tries, they will make 12 points instead of 9.
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,586
And1: 8,156
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#692 » by Mags FTW » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:45 am

What's crazy is our D getting worked this bad tonight and Agholor doesn't even have a catch.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,121
And1: 4,549
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#693 » by BUCKnation » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:46 am

Coming in shoulder/helmet first into a tackle, most likely to blow a guy up, is such a dumb way to tackle from all points.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,241
And1: 27,886
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#694 » by trwi7 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:46 am

kaulkhara15 wrote:
TroyD92 wrote:What is that small group of fans trying to chant ?


Pretty sure I heard “joe buck sucks” lol


I can't hate Joe Buck too much after hearing his pot brownie story.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,204
And1: 9,787
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#695 » by crkone » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:46 am

Jk Scott reciting scripture there.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,586
And1: 8,156
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#696 » by Mags FTW » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:46 am

Even if we convert for 2, I have zero faith in our D to keep them out of FG range.
raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,867
And1: 1,321
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#697 » by raysbookclub » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:46 am

Why the Eagles playing so out of control? Helmet-to-helmet on our guys, helmet-to-helmet on their own guys, avoidable face masks. Guys who play like that need to be gotten under control. Like that guy Brandon Merriweather, I remember that one game where he gave Eddie Lacy a concussion with his helmet-to-helmet tackling and then gave himself one too.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,119
And1: 41,644
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#698 » by emunney » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:47 am

Touchpass wrote:If players ever got back to tackling instead of launching themselves like missiles it would probably help reduce the amount of injuries.


Ban helmets.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Jollay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,024
And1: 661
Joined: Apr 25, 2003

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#699 » by Jollay » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:48 am

I like our running game after 20 straight passes!!!
User avatar
FrieAaron
General Manager
Posts: 9,191
And1: 5,699
Joined: Mar 25, 2010

Re: Game 4: Eagles at Packers - 7:20 - FOX 

Post#700 » by FrieAaron » Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:48 am

trwi7 wrote:
dedned wrote:The helmets have to be worse than back in the day. I don't remember MFs dying when taking a shot to the head.


I think the problem is players think they're more protected than they actually are so they're totally reckless with their tackling. You don't see stuff like this in rugby or Aussie Rules Football where it still involves physical play and tackling but no helmets are used.


I was actually just commenting to my wife in the first quarter that less padding may actually lead to fewer serious injuries.

Return to Green Bay Packers