ImageImageImage

Love in town to "see what it's like"

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts

Afam
RealGM
Posts: 14,148
And1: 8,437
Joined: Nov 29, 2011

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#741 » by Afam » Wed Jun 4, 2014 11:26 pm

PaulGaston wrote:
Afam wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:If you were a real Celtic fan, my ironic username would be an obvious clue. What team are you a fan of?


Nvm. My logo clearly says what team I rep. You didn't have to be so snappy. I was jus asking a simple question but nvm. Btw I have no idea who you are referring to on your username. I probably wasn't even born in that era:

Lol no worries. I understand a lot of Celtics fans didn't exist prior to 2007. I didn't mean to come off so snappy.


I did. I started following the team around 2001. I was saying I have no idea who were referring to in your username because I'm only 28.
Slax
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,579
And1: 7,076
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: New York
       

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#742 » by Slax » Wed Jun 4, 2014 11:34 pm

Afam wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:
Afam wrote:
Nvm. My logo clearly says what team I rep. You didn't have to be so snappy. I was jus asking a simple question but nvm. Btw I have no idea who you are referring to on your username. I probably wasn't even born in that era:

Lol no worries. I understand a lot of Celtics fans didn't exist prior to 2007. I didn't mean to come off so snappy.


I did. I started following the team around 2001. I was saying I have no idea who was referring to in your username because I'm only 28.


The Gastons owned the Celtics prior to the current ownership group.
User avatar
DK-All Day
General Manager
Posts: 9,746
And1: 8,458
Joined: Oct 12, 2013
     

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#743 » by DK-All Day » Wed Jun 4, 2014 11:50 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/MrTrpleDouble10/status/474323463218270208[/tweet]
Handsome.
Afam
RealGM
Posts: 14,148
And1: 8,437
Joined: Nov 29, 2011

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#744 » by Afam » Wed Jun 4, 2014 11:50 pm

Slax wrote:
Afam wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:Lol no worries. I understand a lot of Celtics fans didn't exist prior to 2007. I didn't mean to come off so snappy.


I did. I started following the team around 2001. I was saying I have no idea who was referring to in your username because I'm only 28.


The Gastons owned the Celtics prior to the current ownership group.


Thanks. I looked him up. I wasn't even born yet when gaston acquired the Celtics. Anyways back to the Kevin love topic.
User avatar
SuperDeluxe
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,009
And1: 23,834
Joined: Feb 23, 2003
Location: Celtic Nation
   

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#745 » by SuperDeluxe » Wed Jun 4, 2014 11:55 pm

DK-All Day wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/MrTrpleDouble10/status/474323463218270208[/tweet]

Well, Rondo isn't signing a new contract until 2015, so...

Is Jackie speculating? Or is she actually privy to actual info from Love's camp?
BfB
Analyst
Posts: 3,283
And1: 3,118
Joined: Jun 24, 2010

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#746 » by BfB » Thu Jun 5, 2014 12:08 am

PaulGaston wrote:
FingerRoll wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:I'm sure Boston is one possible destination, but there are teams that can outbid them. Don't get your hopes up.


I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.

That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.

As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.

Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.


Look, Jackie Mac is a great journalist and has a shrewd understanding of the game. That being said, when a team source discusses trade scenarios with a journalist there is a HUGE incentive to provide information that benefits the team providing the information. Teams often use the media to push their agenda. So, just because a team source states something, does not mean that it is the gospel.

I'm sure MIN is not thrilled with BOS offer 3 weeks before the draft. They want more and they are trying to create a market through mis-information and leaks - hence the myriad of leaked rumors surrounding Love recently. You have to play teams off of one another to try and force their respective hands and up the ante. I'm sure Jackie's source conveyed dissatisfaction and didn't sound optimistic about BOS chances of landing Love - which is EXACTLY the type of sentiment you want to send to a HoF journalist with deep ties to Boston after "the weekend" just occured - this is damage control 101. Notice how both WOJ and Jackie both had dish immediately following the media frenzy.
User avatar
FingerRoll
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,534
And1: 336
Joined: Mar 21, 2012
Location: ...fadeaway in the trainers lap

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#747 » by FingerRoll » Thu Jun 5, 2014 12:10 am

BfB wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:
FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.

That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.

As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.

Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.


Look, Jackie Mac is a great journalist and has a shrewd understanding of the game. That being said, when a team source discusses trade scenarios with a journalist there is a HUGE incentive to provide information that benefits the team providing the information. Teams often use the media to push their agenda. So, just because a team source states something, does not mean that it is the gospel.

I'm sure MIN is not thrilled with BOS offer 3 weeks before the draft. They want more and they are trying to create a market through mis-information and leaks - hence the myriad of leaked rumors surrounding Love recently. You have to play teams off of one another to try and force their respective hands and up the ante. I'm sure Jackie's source conveyed dissatisfaction and didn't sound optimistic about BOS chances of landing Love - which is EXACTLY the type of sentiment you want to send to a HoF journalist with deep ties to Boston after "the weekend" just occured - this is damage control 101. Notice how both WOJ and Jackie both had dish immediately following the media frenzy.


Yes. They want us to up our offer and include some Brooklyn picks.
User avatar
pfm
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,930
And1: 1,652
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
 

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#748 » by pfm » Thu Jun 5, 2014 12:19 am

Minny is likely dealing Love on draft night, which is 3 weeks away now. You better believe they are going to do whatever they can in the next 3 weeks to draw out the strongest offers possible from all parties. Posturing, bluffing, media leaks, and playing teams off of each other is all a part of that process.
PaulGaston
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 157
Joined: Mar 14, 2012

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#749 » by PaulGaston » Thu Jun 5, 2014 12:29 am

BfB wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:
FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.

That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.

As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.

Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.


Look, Jackie Mac is a great journalist and has a shrewd understanding of the game. That being said, when a team source discusses trade scenarios with a journalist there is a HUGE incentive to provide information that benefits the team providing the information. Teams often use the media to push their agenda. So, just because a team source states something, does not mean that it is the gospel.

I'm sure MIN is not thrilled with BOS offer 3 weeks before the draft. They want more and they are trying to create a market through mis-information and leaks - hence the myriad of leaked rumors surrounding Love recently. You have to play teams off of one another to try and force their respective hands and up the ante. I'm sure Jackie's source conveyed dissatisfaction and didn't sound optimistic about BOS chances of landing Love - which is EXACTLY the type of sentiment you want to send to a HoF journalist with deep ties to Boston after "the weekend" just occured - this is damage control 101. Notice how both WOJ and Jackie both had dish immediately following the media frenzy.

Eh. If Jackie has sources, it's within Boston. IF she says that the Wolves aren't interested in what Ainge is offering, I doubt it's coming from the Timberwolves. It's probably coming from someone in Boston who says, "All this hype about Love is overblown... we aren't anywhere close on a deal"... that's not to say there isn't gamemanship in what is leaked to the media... but there's also a chance that when she says it's doubtful it happens... it's because it's doubtful it happens.

To reiterate, as much as we can sit here and say "aint nobody gonna beat Boston's assets!", it's not really true. We're basing this on speculation and unsubstantiated rumors. I heard speculation/unsubstantiated rumors that the Rockets would shock everyone and actually consider trading James Harden in a package for Love... while also freeing cap space to bring in Melo. Likey garbage? Sure. But who knows. This idea that Love is on the verge of coming to Boston merely because he took a weekend visit is equally as silly.

Seems to me the visit was more about Love's player option for 2015-16. He can't sign an extension until next season, but they CAN make a trade contingent on him opting in for the 2015-16 season (similar to what Chris Paul did when the Clippers traded for him). Locking up Love for 2 years would make trading significant assets for him less of a risk. Putting 2-and-2 together, if Jackie Mac is CORRECT and Ainge is "lowballing" the Wolves, it's likely because it'd be insane for him to give up considerable assets for a 1 year rental of Kevin Love.. that's a potential Dwightmare situation all over again. However, if it's clear that Love is willing to opt-in for his 2nd season, that makes giving up assets easier to stomach. It still would possibly amount to a 2 year rental, but at least you'd have some more prep-time... if things didn't work out in Year 1, you could just flip him next summer. The trip to Boston was likely set up by his agent so Love could determine if Boston is ONE OF THE teams he'd consider opting in with. He didn't know the city and probably wasn't sure if it was a place he was comfortable with playing in. Let's just jump to conclusions and assume he liked what he saw. Next steps would be Love telling his agent,"Ok... add Boston to the list of teams I'll opt-in with". Love's agent then tells Sota... Sota mentions it in their trade discussions... and perhaps Ainge ups his offer. But let's also jump to conclusions and assume that Love long ago decided that he was fine doing the 2015-16 opt-in with Lakers, Warriors, Rockets, Bulls, etc... Perhaps they didn't find a trip to those cities necessary, because he already knew what to expect with them. Keep in mind that the presumable goal of Love/his agent is to get Love out of Minnesota... not get Love to Boston. The more teams Love is willing to commit to, the more teams the Wolves can negotiate with in good faith... the better the offers they can get... the more likely they will trade Love and Love can accomplish his goal of leaving. If Love's people tell the Wolves, "It's the Lakers or bust", then that really leaves no leverage for the Wolves... and they'll have no option but take the #7 pick or negotiate with a team like the Kings who is crazy enough to give up assets without a commitment from Love. I am speculating that the BOston trip was just about expanding Love's options and giving the Wolves more serious contenders.

WE're reading into the trip and saying "oh! Love is coming to Boston!", because we're a forum full of homers who want to believe. "OMG... Love went to a Red SOx game... fire up the Ron Paul gif!".. But temper your expectations a bit. This is a long way from being over. Don't be shocked if Love is traded elsewhere. No doubt we have a good chance at landing him, though.
User avatar
Celtic Esquire
General Manager
Posts: 8,952
And1: 3,717
Joined: Aug 24, 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#750 » by Celtic Esquire » Thu Jun 5, 2014 12:50 am

Slartibartfast wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:
FingerRoll wrote:
I really just don't see another team outbidding the C's and to state otherwise is crazy talk.

That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.

As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.

Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.


When/where did Jackie weigh in? I haven't seen it.


http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/11 ... -slam-dunk
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,191
And1: 15,057
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#751 » by 165bows » Thu Jun 5, 2014 1:20 am

SuperDeluxe wrote:
DK-All Day wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/MrTrpleDouble10/status/474323463218270208[/tweet]

Well, Rondo isn't signing a new contract until 2015, so...

Is Jackie speculating? Or is she actually privy to actual info from Love's camp?


Putting together a couple of things from this thread and the Jackie Mac thread:

OldCeltics wrote:On CSN Gary Tanguay and Trenni Kusnierek interview Jackie MacMullen.

Jackie works for ESPN Boston, has a ton of connections and has spoken with many sources in Minessota area.

1) Flip Saunders had a good relationship with Doc Rivers, not a good relationship with Ainge. Its not the same as when Mchale made the KG trade.

2) The Minessota owner is still angry over the KG trade not working out for the Wolves, so he is hesitant to give Boston another super star.

3) Flip doesn't like the Celtics first offer, and is looking around to other teams. They don't think highly of the #6 pick. If Celtics got top 3 pick in the draft lottery the deal would already be done.


So if Flip was more a Doc guy than an Ainge guy, then we can be pretty clear where all this is coming from. As if it isn't clear by the content. Doc, if I remember correctly, was always Boston's Jackie connection (with KG and PP) more than Ainge.

It starts to make a little more sense though.

The KO pick, maybe always trade bait? The Love-Boston Tour was maybe the keep me the Hell out of Sacramento Tour? Can this summer eventually top Doc-Clips rumor action?
User avatar
ILC
Veteran
Posts: 2,713
And1: 2,277
Joined: Apr 15, 2014
 

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#752 » by ILC » Thu Jun 5, 2014 1:26 am

165bows wrote:So if Flip was more a Doc guy than an Ainge guy, then we can be pretty clear where all this is coming from. As if I t isn't clear by the content. Doc, if I remember correctly, was always Boston's Jackie connection (with KG and PP) more than Ainge.

It starts to make a little more sense though.

The KO pick, maybe always trade bait? The Love-Boston Tour was maybe the keep me the Hell out of Sacramento Tour? Can this summer eventually top Doc-Clips rumor action?


Can you please explain this a little bit more?
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Redemption. Water into wine....rondo is Jesus
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,191
And1: 15,057
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#753 » by 165bows » Thu Jun 5, 2014 1:43 am

IlCapitano wrote:
165bows wrote:So if Flip was more a Doc guy than an Ainge guy, then we can be pretty clear where all this is coming from. As if I t isn't clear by the content. Doc, if I remember correctly, was always Boston's Jackie connection (with KG and PP) more than Ainge.

It starts to make a little more sense though.

The KO pick, maybe always trade bait? The Love-Boston Tour was maybe the keep me the Hell out of Sacramento Tour? Can this summer eventually top Doc-Clips rumor action?


Can you please explain this a little bit more?


I'm basically making assumptions based on a few things:

Flip Saunders (MIN's GM) used to be a consultant for the Celtics a couple of years back. There's been a general assumption that would mean that he had a strong relationship with Ainge. It's also been my understanding that Jackie MacMullen had a closer relationship as a journalist with Doc Rivers than with Ainge (though I could be totally wrong about that).

So based on what OldCeltics posted, it looks like ironically MacMullen may have closer sources in MIN than Boston, and Boston doesn't have as close a relationship with the current Wolves management as I and maybe others had been assuming.
User avatar
RondoToKG
Head Coach
Posts: 6,767
And1: 1,589
Joined: Dec 23, 2010
Location: Delta Quadrant
 

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#754 » by RondoToKG » Thu Jun 5, 2014 1:59 am

PaulGaston wrote:
RondoToKG wrote:
PaulGaston wrote:That's not really true, though. THere are several teams that COULD outbid Boston. Yes we have a lot of picks (most of which only have theoretical value), but teams could offer up tangible talent for Love.

As much as everyone is excited, this is a long way from being over. Jackie MacMullen shot down the absurd idea that Boston was close to nabbing Love + Melo. Her sources say that the Wolves aren't happy with Ainge's offer and she doubted Boston would land Love.

Yeah, perhaps Ainge is lowballing the Wolves with hopes of raising his offer down the line, but who knows. I think it's silly to definitively say "The Warriors aren't parting with Klay THompson in a deal" or "The Rockets aren't parting with Parsons in a deal" or "Love wouldn't play in Cleveland if they offered the #1 pick". We don't actually know that. I say Boston has a good shot, but I still think it's more likely we don't get Love.


I know a lot of people like Jackie but she will always be the journalist who claimed KG was going to retire 892374829342 times the season before he reupped for a couple more years. To me, that's sounds like someone who didn't have a clue what they were talking about and just assumed things putting rumors out there.

That's a fair point... but I don't remember her ever conclusively saying that KG was going to retire... just that he was strongly considering it. Which he was by his own admission...

I think she's well respected and has sources.


She didn't outright say it was happening. She kept saying "I've been talking to KG", "I've been talking to the players", "I've been talking to Doc", "I'm around the team all the time" blah blah blah.... Right after we lost Game 7 in 2010 she was starting the KG retirement rumor because "he looked like he was done". And from then on clung onto that whenever she could because it got tons of press.

Honestly, if she didn't say it every chance she got I might not care so much, but it seems like she was just throwing out her own opinion based off of what she knows and it turned out to be completely wrong. Every time she would mention it I would cringe because it just seemed like **** journalism without any backbone. Not a fan of her to say the least and it's not just that I'm basing my dislike off of.
Frank Lucas
Pro Prospect
Posts: 941
And1: 37
Joined: Jan 23, 2009

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#755 » by Frank Lucas » Thu Jun 5, 2014 3:03 am

Over the last couple of days you had guys coming on realgm using what people write on here as insider information. They took what I said about Kevin Love being a done deal and run with it. WEEI, 98.5 Sports Hub and Celtic Blog all running with it. So none of us should be surprised that Jackie Mac has come out with an hold your breaks Kevin Love is not even close to coming to Boston article. She pretty much stated the obvious in her article. She pointed out things I have pointed out as to why a Kevin Love trade may not happen. I said a few times it might be best to hold off for both parties until mid season or even next off-season if Love really wants to come to Boston. Our assets will be more valuable this time next year. Plus we might not have to give up as much later on down the road. It a big risk but that all being talk about I'm sure. Danny is not going to mortgage the farm for Kevin Love. I'm sure Love would not want that either. Again we aren't going to bid against ourselves here. I'm not sure the market is as big for Love services as we are all lead to believe.
GreenBloodedC
RealGM
Posts: 12,619
And1: 14,808
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#756 » by GreenBloodedC » Thu Jun 5, 2014 3:03 am

DK-All Day wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/MrTrpleDouble10/status/474323463218270208[/tweet]

This is so simple. Rondo should just clandestinely call Love and say

"look, I have no plans on leaving Boston. Just sign here and let's challenge the Heat. Once the extension talks come up, I'm definitely staying."
Rich-homie
Banned User
Posts: 21
And1: 2
Joined: May 29, 2014
         

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#757 » by Rich-homie » Thu Jun 5, 2014 3:09 am

GreenBloodedC
RealGM
Posts: 12,619
And1: 14,808
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#758 » by GreenBloodedC » Thu Jun 5, 2014 3:12 am

Rich-homie wrote:http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/11033627/kevin-love-landing-boston-celtics-far-slam-dunk


:-?

Idk guys :,(

No team is trading a top 3 pick for a rental of Love. That's that.
Rich-homie
Banned User
Posts: 21
And1: 2
Joined: May 29, 2014
         

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#759 » by Rich-homie » Thu Jun 5, 2014 3:16 am

GreenBloodedC wrote:
Rich-homie wrote:http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/11033627/kevin-love-landing-boston-celtics-far-slam-dunk


:-?

Idk guys :,(

No team is trading a top 3 pick for a rental of Love. That's that.



I feel you on that but why people are so high on taj Gibson? He is just average an like heading into his 30's butler is decent as well just over hype players on the bulls I don't see no deal with bulls
GreenBloodedC
RealGM
Posts: 12,619
And1: 14,808
Joined: May 08, 2012

Re: Love in town to "see what it's like" 

Post#760 » by GreenBloodedC » Thu Jun 5, 2014 3:18 am

Rich-homie wrote:
GreenBloodedC wrote:
Rich-homie wrote:http://espn.go.com/boston/story/_/id/11033627/kevin-love-landing-boston-celtics-far-slam-dunk


:-?

Idk guys :,(

No team is trading a top 3 pick for a rental of Love. That's that.



I feel you on that but why people are so high on taj Gibson? He is just average an like heading into his 30's butler is decent as well just over hype players on the bulls I don't see no deal with bulls

To tell you the truth, I'm confused as well.

I'm not really threatened by what the Bulls, GSW or Rockets have to offer. And I maintain my stance that the only team that could give us a scare is if Cleveland offers their number 1 pick.

But I don't know anymore, crazier things have happened. :lol:

Return to Boston Celtics