Moderators: mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK
blueNorange wrote:who shoots himself in the chest?
slacker55 wrote:blueNorange wrote:who shoots himself in the chest?
But then again, what kind of "hitman" lets their victim die hours later in a hospital?
And if it's true that the detective believed a crime was committed, Rose would have been charged with a crime by now.
So if anyone ordered a hit, it's someone in Jane Doe's camp to try to make Rose look bad...
Sark wrote:Who the hell commits suicide by shooting yourself in the chest? Doesn't sound right.
Women who commit suicide are more likely than men to avoid facial disfiguration, but not necessarily in the name of vanity. Valerie Callanan from the University of Akron and Mark Davis from the Criminal Justice Research Center at the Ohio State University, USA, show that there are marked gender differences in the use of suicide methods that disfigure the face or head. While firearms are the preferred method for both men and women, women are less likely to shoot themselves in the head.
blueNorange wrote:slacker55 wrote:blueNorange wrote:who shoots himself in the chest?
But then again, what kind of "hitman" lets their victim die hours later in a hospital?
And if it's true that the detective believed a crime was committed, Rose would have been charged with a crime by now.
So if anyone ordered a hit, it's someone in Jane Doe's camp to try to make Rose look bad...
whatever it is, it's something.
unless the dude wanted to donate his brain to science, it's just weird. then again forensics will find out what really happened.
blueNorange wrote:slacker55 wrote:blueNorange wrote:who shoots himself in the chest?
But then again, what kind of "hitman" lets their victim die hours later in a hospital?
And if it's true that the detective believed a crime was committed, Rose would have been charged with a crime by now.
So if anyone ordered a hit, it's someone in Jane Doe's camp to try to make Rose look bad...
whatever it is, it's something.
unless the dude wanted to donate his brain to science, it's just weird. then again forensics will find out what really happened.
Bill Pidto wrote:blueNorange wrote:slacker55 wrote:
But then again, what kind of "hitman" lets their victim die hours later in a hospital?
And if it's true that the detective believed a crime was committed, Rose would have been charged with a crime by now.
So if anyone ordered a hit, it's someone in Jane Doe's camp to try to make Rose look bad...
whatever it is, it's something.
unless the dude wanted to donate his brain to science, it's just weird. then again forensics will find out what really happened.
First off, it was a woman, and not a dude.
Second, you can't paint Rose as a mush-mouth idiot and then credit him with wacking one of the detectives on his case
Not to mention, I doubt murdering one detective will save him from a rape charge if the LAPD had a case built on him, unless she was holding all of the evidence in her bra when they shot her in the chest.
A definite non-story as it pertains to Rose and the Knicks. This was either related to a completely different case, or more likely than that, it truly was a suicide or murder totally unrelated to her line of work. Pure coincidence. Mind-numbingly stupid to even consider Rose a suspect in this.
How many times does someone have to mention that the LAPD opened an investigation 2 years ago and haven't come close to charging Derrick?
Bill Pidto wrote:blueNorange wrote:slacker55 wrote:
But then again, what kind of "hitman" lets their victim die hours later in a hospital?
And if it's true that the detective believed a crime was committed, Rose would have been charged with a crime by now.
So if anyone ordered a hit, it's someone in Jane Doe's camp to try to make Rose look bad...
whatever it is, it's something.
unless the dude wanted to donate his brain to science, it's just weird. then again forensics will find out what really happened.
First off, it was a woman, and not a dude.
Second, you can't paint Rose as a mush-mouth idiot and then credit him with wacking one of the detectives on his case
Not to mention, I doubt murdering one detective will save him from a rape charge if the LAPD had a case built on him, unless she was holding all of the evidence in her bra when they shot her in the chest.
A definite non-story as it pertains to Rose and the Knicks. This was either related to a completely different case, or more likely than that, it truly was a suicide or murder totally unrelated to her line of work. Pure coincidence. Mind-numbingly stupid to even consider Rose a suspect in this.
How many times does someone have to mention that the LAPD opened an investigation 2 years ago and haven't come close to charging Derrick?
Bill Pidto wrote:How many times does someone have to mention that the LAPD opened an investigation 2 years ago and haven't come close to charging Derrick?
This note is to clarify any misconception that the Los Angeles Police Department does not have a current and open criminal investigation pending that names the same suspects as the defendants in the current civil case being handled by your office (Case No. CV 15-7503-MWF (JCx). When filing the crime report, the victim in this case exercised her right to confidentiality as outlined in California Penal Code section 293.5. (a). Her identity will continue to remain confidential throughout the criminal investigation being handled by the Los Angeles Police Department.
blueNorange wrote:Bill Pidto wrote:blueNorange wrote:whatever it is, it's something.
unless the dude wanted to donate his brain to science, it's just weird. then again forensics will find out what really happened.
First off, it was a woman, and not a dude.
Second, you can't paint Rose as a mush-mouth idiot and then credit him with wacking one of the detectives on his case
Not to mention, I doubt murdering one detective will save him from a rape charge if the LAPD had a case built on him, unless she was holding all of the evidence in her bra when they shot her in the chest.
A definite non-story as it pertains to Rose and the Knicks. This was either related to a completely different case, or more likely than that, it truly was a suicide or murder totally unrelated to her line of work. Pure coincidence. Mind-numbingly stupid to even consider Rose a suspect in this.
How many times does someone have to mention that the LAPD opened an investigation 2 years ago and haven't come close to charging Derrick?
did i accuse rose of doing anything?
trophywinner wrote:does this really need to go on for another week?
blueNorange wrote:what a coward(the cop)
NYKinMIA wrote:blueNorange wrote:what a coward(the cop)
Who the fuq are you make a statement like this? Do you know ANYTHING at all about the woman?
Stick to basketball discussions bruh.
HighRyzer83 wrote:This is ridiculous, players shouldn't get paid until they play unless injured. Unable to play due to off court issues should result in forfeiture of contract
JXL wrote:NYKinMIA wrote:blueNorange wrote:what a coward(the cop)
Who the fuq are you make a statement like this? Do you know ANYTHING at all about the woman?
Stick to basketball discussions bruh.
bNo is a HUUUUUGE troll. Still don't get why he's not banned or suspended.
_______ K N I C K S_________ * * GO NY GO NY GO NY GO!* * BKlutch wrote:JXL wrote:NYKinMIA wrote:Who the fuq are you make a statement like this? Do you know ANYTHING at all about the woman?
Stick to basketball discussions bruh.
bNo is a HUUUUUGE troll. Still don't get why he's not banned or suspended.
He seems to only get his kicks from trying to upset us. He isn't really smart or anything - he's rarely right. But trolling a cop who killed herself - that's really beyond believe. What a troubled guy. Very sorry he's on this board.
