dakomish23 wrote:nedleeds wrote:Everyone stop sucking Phillys cock over the **** draft. If you draft in the top 10 like 6 **** times since 2010 after tanking for 8 years and find 2 good players big **** deal. They incinerated the Okafor pick, the Fultz pick and Evan Turner at #2.
The process started in 2013-14 season.
They came away with two guys who look to be perennial all stars, two very good role players and have the ability to sign a max guy this summer.
They also have the SAC pick next year.
They currently have home court advantage in the first round.
They deserve the bj
I get a little annoyed at the nut slobbering with Philly. But they rebuilt right. And for all the "Tanking doesn't work, there are other ways", sure, there is. But in the NBA it's dumb not to maximize value of #1 picks and the way to do that is to ensure they are as high as possible. Yes, they blew some picks. Yes, you have to draft right with the picks or it doesn't matter. Here's where Philly was smart. They didn't give a sh*t about guys they drafted who weren't that good, and dealt them for MORE PICKS. They were smart enough to stay bad and flip "ok picks" for more picks.
And low and behold, the rebuild still took them about 5 years. That's the NBA. Teams almost never rebuild in less than 5 years. I'm sure a few people will rush in with the handful of examples where a team didn't. I'm sure they exist. Most teams take 5 years to rebuild and contend. Or, if you're the Knicks, 15 years and aren't there yet.
You know how something was a good idea? When everyone copies it.
Take note of the last two NBA seasons. There is your answer on if tanking is good or not. In the CURRENT NBA scheme, tanking is a VERY GOOD IDEA. I honestly hope they fix it. It's sort of disgusting. But can't blame teams for gaming a broken system.
*edit* They also managed their cap and didn't spend jack sh*t on middling vets. You know, like Mills opening his wallet wide open for a mediocre starting SG like THJr.