Page 5 of 15

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 5:26 am
by CobraCommander
Tottery wrote:1. Magic
2. Thomas
3. Stockton
4. Nash
5. Kidd

I can't include Oscar or Frazier due to not watching them and being outside the modern era. I don't view Curry as a PG. It's just the title they gave him because titles are required.

I can respect this list if curry not a PG-

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 5:27 am
by SpreeS
This forum already has top100 2023 list.

10 Magic
11 Curry
14 West
15 Oscar
20 Paul
24 Nash
29 Harden
33 Stockton
35 Frazier
38 Kidd
46 Westbrook

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 5:31 am
by canada_dry
JustBuzzin wrote:
canada_dry wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:In order for him to choke he has to have played in meaningful games.

He was never in that position.

I'm not rewarding players who haven't at least went to the Finals in their career. Kidd is also better than Nash.
So you can't choke in the first 3 rounds of the playoffs. Good to know.

I.e when cp3 choked with the clippers multiple times and isiah turned the ball over to bird, clear moments of coming up small in their own conference play.

You're a character.



Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app

Who mentioned anything about CP3 and Isiah still has 2 championships.

I get it you're sticking up for your Canada guy, but Nash is not better than Isiah.
They're examples of guys who you can point to moments where they specifically choked. That too before the finals.

Im still waiting for you to tell me where nash choked. Whats that moment?

You said hes a choker then said he can't choke because he was never in position to choke. So...he wasn't a choker and you lied according to your own definition?

I also have isiah Thomas higher than nash all time btw. And he's my answer for 4th best pg. Easily.

But your silly terminology for "choker" for anyone that hasnt won is childish. Especially when you can't even point to when the hell they choked.

Do better.

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 5:49 am
by Tottery
Optms wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:Nash while great was definitely the product of a system...and he ran that system perfectly-

I knew someone would bring this up. No, Nash was not the product of a system. The main feature of the MDA offense was to give the ball to your best creator and let them create based on the strengths and weaknesses of their game. This is why Nash PnR'd everyone to death and why Harden ran a bunch of ISOs.

I think you could argue that Stockton was somewhat a product of Jerry Sloan's flex cut offense. Scottie Pippen was somewhat a product of the triangle as a big wing who could handle, pass, and cut within a frameowrk. Both these players were great obviously, but their respective systems had built in reads for them to follow.

MDA's "system" was really just spreading the floor and empowering his best player such that the best player became the system.


Nash was the product of D'Antoni's system though. We're talking about the only player in league history who went from a second tier All-star to winning MVP's once he turned 30. If that isn't a dead give away, I don't know what is. Nash also reverted to just a role player once he went to Lakers and he wasn't the focused of the team's offense.


As the person in your avatar would say, "Nash was the system." The majority of the players were there the prior season and D'Antoni took over as head coach. Finished with one of the worst records in the league. Nash was injected and everything changed. People also forget that hand checking was completely removed before Nash's first season in Phoenix. That allowed him to roam a lot more freely and plenty of players benefitted from it.

Nash's best days were behind him when he arrived in LA. He was 38 and his back was done. Not sure why that was brought up.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 5:59 am
by MavsDirk41
SpreeS wrote:This forum already has top100 2023 list.

10 Magic
11 Curry
14 West
15 Oscar
20 Paul
24 Nash
29 Harden
33 Stockton
35 Frazier
38 Kidd
46 Westbrook



Nobody cares about the PC board on here

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:01 am
by MavsDirk41
I rank IT above all of the names mentioned

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:19 am
by WillyJakkz
CobraCommander wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:Unnecessary thread.

We all absolutely know Isaiah Thomas is either 2nd 3rd or at worse 4th on the GOAT PG List.

Should retitle it 5th GOAT PG.

People saw the list and thought the same thing -

NO IT ?

Either Michael Jordan started the thread or someone too young to have saw IT -

But if you saw him- you know -

It’s funny but we give me credit to stats and less value to manufacturering wins that turn into rings-

The fact that IT has 2 rings as the best player on a championship team but is left off for guys that got more assist or points is silly.

Zeke actually beat MJ and MJ took it personally- cause IT didn’t back down or bow down to anyone. zeke knew who mj,
Bird, and Magic were and would not back down period


Fantastic post! More people should take heed to what you said.

Isaiah Thomas went head to head against those juggernaut teams and Superstar personas that had killer will and known as the most fierce competitors in the entire history of the NBA and he beat them!

He's starting to get lost in history and I don't like it myself.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:37 am
by DimesandKnicks
NZB2323 wrote:So I guess we're counting Jerry West and James Harden as shooting guards?

I think IT is overrated. Yes, he beat Larry, Magic, and Jordan in the playoffs. Billups is the only player who has a winning record against Jordan, Kobe, and Lebron. Billups beat Kobe, Shaq, Lebron, Wade, Miller, Iverson, Chris Paul, and Dirk in the playoffs.

They both have 1 finals MVP. IT came very close to only having 1 ring and Billups came very close to having 2.

89 Thomas: 18, 8, and 4, 48.1 TS%, 18.6 PER
90 Thomas: 21, 8, and 6, 56 TS%, 21 PER
97 Stockton: 16, 10, and 65.6 TS%, 22.1 PER
04 Bullups: 16, 6, and 3, 54.6 TS% 18.8 PER
08 Paul: 24, 11, and 5, 56.5 TS%, 30.7 PER
18 Paul: 21, 6, and 6, 22.8 TS%, 22.8 PER

Chris Paul hasn't won a ring, but he beat Dirk, Duncan, Lebron, Curry, Butler, and Jokic in playoff series.

I think this has to be Chris Paul for me. He's a better defender than Steve Nash. He's a better scorer than Stockton, Payton, and Kidd. He's a better passer than Payton. He's better at everything than Isiah.

Most people don't remember this, but the 2014 Spurs had one of the best playoff runs of all time but then lost in the first round next year to a game-winner Chris Paul hit over Tim Duncan.



At age 22 he outplayed Dirk in a playoff series. At age 32 he took the Curry/Klay/Durant/Dray Warriors to game 7. At age 35 he took a team that hadn't made the playoffs in 11 years to the Finals. Yes, he had some mistakes in crunch time, like Zeke's pass to the Celtics.

Gary Payton and Jason Kidd won rings as role players later in their careers. Jason Kidd joined a team that won 26 games and took them to the finals twice, only to fall to Shaq/Kobe and Tim Duncan and the Spurs. Gary Payton ran into the 96 Bulls, who were a much better team than the 1990 Bulls. 72-10 and a +13.4 point differential vs. 55 wins and a +3.3 point differential. Stockton ran into the 97 Bulls who won 69 games and had a +12.0 point differential. Nash maybe would have won in 07 if not for the Amare suspension. If Rodman gets suspended for the Pistons, that could have cost IT a ring.

IT also doesn't have longevity.

All-NBA teams:
Chris Paul: 11
Stockton: 11
Payton: 9
Nash: 7
Kidd: 6
Isiah Thomas: 5

All-defensive teams:
Chris Paul: 9
Kidd: 9
Payton: 9
Stockton: 5
Isiah Thomas: 0
Steve Nash: 0

When it comes to stats Isiah Thomas is at the bottom of the lists.

Assists:
1. Stockton
2. Kidd
3. CP3
5. Nash
10. Isiah Thomas
11. Gary Payton

Points:
42. CP3
43. Payton
56. Stockton
72. Isiah Thomas
91. Kidd
94. Nash

Steals:
1. Stockton
2. Kidd
3. CP3
5. Gary Payton
18. Isiah Thomas
242. Steve Nash

VORP:
3. Stockton
6. CP3
20. Kidd
27. Gary Payton
40. Nash
58. Isiah Thomas

BPM:
6. CP3
8. Stockton
40. Jason Kidd
54. Gary Payton
68. Steve Nash
87. Isiah Thomas

Win Shares:
6. Stockton
7. CP3
30. Gary Payton
35. Jason Kidd
42. Steve Nash
166. Isiah Thomas


He’s at the bottom of the list because he only played like ten seasons.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:42 am
by DimesandKnicks
Tottery wrote:1. Magic
2. Thomas
3. Stockton
4. Nash
5. Kidd

I can't include Oscar or Frazier due to not watching them and being outside the modern era. I don't view Curry as a PG. It's just the title they gave him because titles are required.


You must’ve only watched Nash in PHX than to have him over Kidd who went to the finals with two different teams. Jkidd on those Suns teams would absolutely have a ring

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:48 am
by NZB2323
DimesandKnicks wrote:
NZB2323 wrote:So I guess we're counting Jerry West and James Harden as shooting guards?

I think IT is overrated. Yes, he beat Larry, Magic, and Jordan in the playoffs. Billups is the only player who has a winning record against Jordan, Kobe, and Lebron. Billups beat Kobe, Shaq, Lebron, Wade, Miller, Iverson, Chris Paul, and Dirk in the playoffs.

They both have 1 finals MVP. IT came very close to only having 1 ring and Billups came very close to having 2.

89 Thomas: 18, 8, and 4, 48.1 TS%, 18.6 PER
90 Thomas: 21, 8, and 6, 56 TS%, 21 PER
97 Stockton: 16, 10, and 65.6 TS%, 22.1 PER
04 Bullups: 16, 6, and 3, 54.6 TS% 18.8 PER
08 Paul: 24, 11, and 5, 56.5 TS%, 30.7 PER
18 Paul: 21, 6, and 6, 22.8 TS%, 22.8 PER

Chris Paul hasn't won a ring, but he beat Dirk, Duncan, Lebron, Curry, Butler, and Jokic in playoff series.

I think this has to be Chris Paul for me. He's a better defender than Steve Nash. He's a better scorer than Stockton, Payton, and Kidd. He's a better passer than Payton. He's better at everything than Isiah.

Most people don't remember this, but the 2014 Spurs had one of the best playoff runs of all time but then lost in the first round next year to a game-winner Chris Paul hit over Tim Duncan.



At age 22 he outplayed Dirk in a playoff series. At age 32 he took the Curry/Klay/Durant/Dray Warriors to game 7. At age 35 he took a team that hadn't made the playoffs in 11 years to the Finals. Yes, he had some mistakes in crunch time, like Zeke's pass to the Celtics.

Gary Payton and Jason Kidd won rings as role players later in their careers. Jason Kidd joined a team that won 26 games and took them to the finals twice, only to fall to Shaq/Kobe and Tim Duncan and the Spurs. Gary Payton ran into the 96 Bulls, who were a much better team than the 1990 Bulls. 72-10 and a +13.4 point differential vs. 55 wins and a +3.3 point differential. Stockton ran into the 97 Bulls who won 69 games and had a +12.0 point differential. Nash maybe would have won in 07 if not for the Amare suspension. If Rodman gets suspended for the Pistons, that could have cost IT a ring.

IT also doesn't have longevity.

All-NBA teams:
Chris Paul: 11
Stockton: 11
Payton: 9
Nash: 7
Kidd: 6
Isiah Thomas: 5

All-defensive teams:
Chris Paul: 9
Kidd: 9
Payton: 9
Stockton: 5
Isiah Thomas: 0
Steve Nash: 0

When it comes to stats Isiah Thomas is at the bottom of the lists.

Assists:
1. Stockton
2. Kidd
3. CP3
5. Nash
10. Isiah Thomas
11. Gary Payton

Points:
42. CP3
43. Payton
56. Stockton
72. Isiah Thomas
91. Kidd
94. Nash

Steals:
1. Stockton
2. Kidd
3. CP3
5. Gary Payton
18. Isiah Thomas
242. Steve Nash

VORP:
3. Stockton
6. CP3
20. Kidd
27. Gary Payton
40. Nash
58. Isiah Thomas

BPM:
6. CP3
8. Stockton
40. Jason Kidd
54. Gary Payton
68. Steve Nash
87. Isiah Thomas

Win Shares:
6. Stockton
7. CP3
30. Gary Payton
35. Jason Kidd
42. Steve Nash
166. Isiah Thomas


He’s at the bottom of the list because he only played like ten seasons.


Okay, and longevity matters.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:53 am
by DimesandKnicks
Tottery wrote:
Optms wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:I knew someone would bring this up. No, Nash was not the product of a system. The main feature of the MDA offense was to give the ball to your best creator and let them create based on the strengths and weaknesses of their game. This is why Nash PnR'd everyone to death and why Harden ran a bunch of ISOs.

I think you could argue that Stockton was somewhat a product of Jerry Sloan's flex cut offense. Scottie Pippen was somewhat a product of the triangle as a big wing who could handle, pass, and cut within a frameowrk. Both these players were great obviously, but their respective systems had built in reads for them to follow.

MDA's "system" was really just spreading the floor and empowering his best player such that the best player became the system.


Nash was the product of D'Antoni's system though. We're talking about the only player in league history who went from a second tier All-star to winning MVP's once he turned 30. If that isn't a dead give away, I don't know what is. Nash also reverted to just a role player once he went to Lakers and he wasn't the focused of the team's offense.


As the person in your avatar would say, "Nash was the system." The majority of the players were there the prior season and D'Antoni took over as head coach. Finished with one of the worst records in the league. Nash was injected and everything changed. People also forget that hand checking was completely removed before Nash's first season in Phoenix. That allowed him to roam a lot more freely and plenty of players benefitted from it.

Nash's best days were behind him when he arrived in LA. He was 38 and his back was done. Not sure why that was brought up.


Amare was injured for more than a qtr of his sophomore season. It amazes me how people can act like Nash was the system when he had an entire act before PHX that no one cared about. If he retired at 30 he isn’t a hall of famer.

If he was who some of you think he was he would have had more success with the Mavs

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:56 am
by DimesandKnicks
NZB2323 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
NZB2323 wrote:So I guess we're counting Jerry West and James Harden as shooting guards?

I think IT is overrated. Yes, he beat Larry, Magic, and Jordan in the playoffs. Billups is the only player who has a winning record against Jordan, Kobe, and Lebron. Billups beat Kobe, Shaq, Lebron, Wade, Miller, Iverson, Chris Paul, and Dirk in the playoffs.

They both have 1 finals MVP. IT came very close to only having 1 ring and Billups came very close to having 2.

89 Thomas: 18, 8, and 4, 48.1 TS%, 18.6 PER
90 Thomas: 21, 8, and 6, 56 TS%, 21 PER
97 Stockton: 16, 10, and 65.6 TS%, 22.1 PER
04 Bullups: 16, 6, and 3, 54.6 TS% 18.8 PER
08 Paul: 24, 11, and 5, 56.5 TS%, 30.7 PER
18 Paul: 21, 6, and 6, 22.8 TS%, 22.8 PER

Chris Paul hasn't won a ring, but he beat Dirk, Duncan, Lebron, Curry, Butler, and Jokic in playoff series.

I think this has to be Chris Paul for me. He's a better defender than Steve Nash. He's a better scorer than Stockton, Payton, and Kidd. He's a better passer than Payton. He's better at everything than Isiah.

Most people don't remember this, but the 2014 Spurs had one of the best playoff runs of all time but then lost in the first round next year to a game-winner Chris Paul hit over Tim Duncan.



At age 22 he outplayed Dirk in a playoff series. At age 32 he took the Curry/Klay/Durant/Dray Warriors to game 7. At age 35 he took a team that hadn't made the playoffs in 11 years to the Finals. Yes, he had some mistakes in crunch time, like Zeke's pass to the Celtics.

Gary Payton and Jason Kidd won rings as role players later in their careers. Jason Kidd joined a team that won 26 games and took them to the finals twice, only to fall to Shaq/Kobe and Tim Duncan and the Spurs. Gary Payton ran into the 96 Bulls, who were a much better team than the 1990 Bulls. 72-10 and a +13.4 point differential vs. 55 wins and a +3.3 point differential. Stockton ran into the 97 Bulls who won 69 games and had a +12.0 point differential. Nash maybe would have won in 07 if not for the Amare suspension. If Rodman gets suspended for the Pistons, that could have cost IT a ring.

IT also doesn't have longevity.

All-NBA teams:
Chris Paul: 11
Stockton: 11
Payton: 9
Nash: 7
Kidd: 6
Isiah Thomas: 5

All-defensive teams:
Chris Paul: 9
Kidd: 9
Payton: 9
Stockton: 5
Isiah Thomas: 0
Steve Nash: 0

When it comes to stats Isiah Thomas is at the bottom of the lists.

Assists:
1. Stockton
2. Kidd
3. CP3
5. Nash
10. Isiah Thomas
11. Gary Payton

Points:
42. CP3
43. Payton
56. Stockton
72. Isiah Thomas
91. Kidd
94. Nash

Steals:
1. Stockton
2. Kidd
3. CP3
5. Gary Payton
18. Isiah Thomas
242. Steve Nash

VORP:
3. Stockton
6. CP3
20. Kidd
27. Gary Payton
40. Nash
58. Isiah Thomas

BPM:
6. CP3
8. Stockton
40. Jason Kidd
54. Gary Payton
68. Steve Nash
87. Isiah Thomas

Win Shares:
6. Stockton
7. CP3
30. Gary Payton
35. Jason Kidd
42. Steve Nash
166. Isiah Thomas


He’s at the bottom of the list because he only played like ten seasons.


Okay, and longevity matters.


If you’re actually playing and you get worse or injury prone sure. I don’t see how you can take away cool points from a player for retiring and saying others are better players because they played longer. If that’s the case Lebron is the goat, KAJ is 2 and Karl Malone is top five.

You can’t highlight longevity stats which are essential career totals as an argument for why a player is better.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 6:56 am
by Rishkar
CobraCommander wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:Unnecessary thread.

We all absolutely know Isaiah Thomas is either 2nd 3rd or at worse 4th on the GOAT PG List.

Should retitle it 5th GOAT PG.

People saw the list and thought the same thing -

NO IT ?

Either Michael Jordan started the thread or someone too young to have saw IT -

But if you saw him- you know -

It’s funny but we give me credit to stats and less value to manufacturering wins that turn into rings-

The fact that IT has 2 rings as the best player on a championship team but is left off for guys that got more assist or points is silly.

Zeke actually beat MJ and MJ took it personally- cause IT didn’t back down or bow down to anyone. zeke knew who mj,
Bird, and Magic were and would not back down period

Yeah, I'm 18 and never got to watch IT play live. I edited the poll to add more options, I never realized how many people rank Thomas so highly. He has the advanced statistics of Earl Monroe, placed 69th in POY shares (right next to Penny Hardway), only finished top 5 in MVP voting one in the second weakest era of shotclock basketball, didn't make Ben Taylor's top 40 careers in NBA history, and placed significantly behind all the players originally included in the poll in the 2020 top 100 project (where he is yet to be even nominated this year). As a genuine question, besides being the best player on the historically deep Pistons squad's championship runs, where was he elite? Why would he be ranked this highly, or do people just rank rings really highly? His number's are underselling his impact, so what was he doing that didn't show up in a stat sheet?

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 7:03 am
by VanWest82
DimesandKnicks wrote:
Tottery wrote:
Optms wrote:
Nash was the product of D'Antoni's system though. We're talking about the only player in league history who went from a second tier All-star to winning MVP's once he turned 30. If that isn't a dead give away, I don't know what is. Nash also reverted to just a role player once he went to Lakers and he wasn't the focused of the team's offense.


As the person in your avatar would say, "Nash was the system." The majority of the players were there the prior season and D'Antoni took over as head coach. Finished with one of the worst records in the league. Nash was injected and everything changed. People also forget that hand checking was completely removed before Nash's first season in Phoenix. That allowed him to roam a lot more freely and plenty of players benefitted from it.

Nash's best days were behind him when he arrived in LA. He was 38 and his back was done. Not sure why that was brought up.


Amare was injured for more than a qtr of his sophomore season. It amazes me how people can act like Nash was the system when he had an entire act before PHX that no one cared about. If he retired at 30 he isn’t a hall of famer.

If he was who some of you think he was he would have had more success with the Mavs

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 7:05 am
by DimesandKnicks
Rishkar wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:Unnecessary thread.

We all absolutely know Isaiah Thomas is either 2nd 3rd or at worse 4th on the GOAT PG List.

Should retitle it 5th GOAT PG.

People saw the list and thought the same thing -

NO IT ?

Either Michael Jordan started the thread or someone too young to have saw IT -

But if you saw him- you know -

It’s funny but we give me credit to stats and less value to manufacturering wins that turn into rings-

The fact that IT has 2 rings as the best player on a championship team but is left off for guys that got more assist or points is silly.

Zeke actually beat MJ and MJ took it personally- cause IT didn’t back down or bow down to anyone. zeke knew who mj,
Bird, and Magic were and would not back down period

Yeah, I'm 18 and never got to watch IT play live. I edited the poll to add more options, I never realized how many people rank Thomas so highly. He has the advanced statistics of Earl Monroe, placed 69th in POY shares (right next to Penny Hardway), only finished top 5 in MVP voting one in the second weakest era of shotclock basketball, didn't make Ben Taylor's top 40 careers in NBA history, and placed significantly behind all the players originally included in the poll in the 2020 top 100 project (where he is yet to be even nominated this year). As a genuine question, besides being the best player on the historically deep Pistons squad's championship runs, where was he elite? Why would he be ranked this highly, or do people just rank rings really highly? His number's are underselling his impact, so what was he doing that didn't show up in a stat sheet?


The Pistons were historically deep? He’s ranked so highly because out of all the pg in NBA history he’s one of the most complete. He can score 20, dish 10, steal 2 and win you a ring on a broken foot. He was Chris Paul before Chris Paul and he played in a league that was still dominated and built around big men/physical and managed to win TWO..not one, but TWO rings beating out historically great, multi championship winning teams.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 7:09 am
by CobraCommander
Rishkar wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:Unnecessary thread.

We all absolutely know Isaiah Thomas is either 2nd 3rd or at worse 4th on the GOAT PG List.

Should retitle it 5th GOAT PG.

People saw the list and thought the same thing -

NO IT ?

Either Michael Jordan started the thread or someone too young to have saw IT -

But if you saw him- you know -

It’s funny but we give me credit to stats and less value to manufacturering wins that turn into rings-

The fact that IT has 2 rings as the best player on a championship team but is left off for guys that got more assist or points is silly.

Zeke actually beat MJ and MJ took it personally- cause IT didn’t back down or bow down to anyone. zeke knew who mj,
Bird, and Magic were and would not back down period

Yeah, I'm 18 and never got to watch IT play live. I edited the poll to add more options, I never realized how many people rank Thomas so highly. He has the advanced statistics of Earl Monroe, placed 69th in POY shares (right next to Penny Hardway), only finished top 5 in MVP voting one in the second weakest era of shotclock basketball, didn't make Ben Taylor's top 40 careers in NBA history, and placed significantly behind all the players originally included in the poll in the 2020 top 100 project (where he is yet to be even nominated this year). As a genuine question, besides being the best player on the historically deep Pistons squad's championship runs, where was he elite? Why would he be ranked this highly, or do people just rank rings really highly? His number's are underselling his impact, so what was he doing that didn't show up in a stat sheet?

Yeah first and foremost I respect your humility-

You can’t know what you don’t know -

One thing I will say with only the most basic stats - in games that end 100 to 95 - scoring 21 with 8 assist is more impactful than scoring 30 and 8 assist in a game where the score is 134 to 128. A lot of the guys are being under rated because the game is so different era by era -

I think WINNING rings has to be part of the equation.

Winning rings over MJ, Bird and Magic means even more
To me. Think about all the greats that those 3 prevented from winning rings - they couldn’t stop IT

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 7:09 am
by Chuck Everett
Rishkar wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:
WillyJakkz wrote:Unnecessary thread.

We all absolutely know Isaiah Thomas is either 2nd 3rd or at worse 4th on the GOAT PG List.

Should retitle it 5th GOAT PG.

People saw the list and thought the same thing -

NO IT ?

Either Michael Jordan started the thread or someone too young to have saw IT -

But if you saw him- you know -

It’s funny but we give me credit to stats and less value to manufacturering wins that turn into rings-

The fact that IT has 2 rings as the best player on a championship team but is left off for guys that got more assist or points is silly.

Zeke actually beat MJ and MJ took it personally- cause IT didn’t back down or bow down to anyone. zeke knew who mj,
Bird, and Magic were and would not back down period

Yeah, I'm 18 and never got to watch IT play live. I edited the poll to add more options, I never realized how many people rank Thomas so highly. He has the advanced statistics of Earl Monroe, placed 69th in POY shares (right next to Penny Hardway), only finished top 5 in MVP voting one in the second weakest era of shotclock basketball, didn't make Ben Taylor's top 40 careers in NBA history, and placed significantly behind all the players originally included in the poll in the 2020 top 100 project (where he is yet to be even nominated this year). As a genuine question, besides being the best player on the historically deep Pistons squad's championship runs, where was he elite? Why would he be ranked this highly, or do people just rank rings really highly? His number's are underselling his impact, so what was he doing that didn't show up in a stat sheet?



Isiah was the leader and best player on three straight NBA Finals teams and two winners. Detroit is not an easy place in this league to win titles. Instead of giving us all of these advanced stats from the regular season, why not give us the playoff statistics? The regular season does not matter when it comes to historical greatness (when comparing the best players in the league). If it did, Wilt Chamberlain would be considered the unquestioned greatest of all time.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 7:19 am
by CobraCommander
SpreeS wrote:This forum already has top100 2023 list.

10 Magic
11 Curry
14 West
15 Oscar
20 Paul
24 Nash
29 Harden
33 Stockton
35 Frazier
38 Kidd
46 Westbrook

Westbrook is better than IT-
Image


If it’s a stat comp - it’s Westbrook and it’s not close- his best stat year was one of the best stat years ever

If it’s skills it’s Kyrie - as voted by his peers and the legacy nba players

If it’s about winning IT ahead of both of them by miles

These are facts that you can not deny Mr Anderson


(Read the post using the cadence and voice of agent smith)

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 8:50 am
by SilentA
Rishkar wrote:Yeah, I'm 18 and never got to watch IT play live. I edited the poll to add more options, I never realized how many people rank Thomas so highly. He has the advanced statistics of Earl Monroe, placed 69th in POY shares (right next to Penny Hardway), only finished top 5 in MVP voting one in the second weakest era of shotclock basketball, didn't make Ben Taylor's top 40 careers in NBA history, and placed significantly behind all the players originally included in the poll in the 2020 top 100 project (where he is yet to be even nominated this year). As a genuine question, besides being the best player on the historically deep Pistons squad's championship runs, where was he elite? Why would he be ranked this highly, or do people just rank rings really highly? His number's are underselling his impact, so what was he doing that didn't show up in a stat sheet?


He did make Ben Taylor's top 40 list per the Fall 2022 update fwiw (39th). There's a podcast episode about it.

I will try to give a genuine answer/opinion from going on an old game binge. I grew up watching late 90s/early 2000s and only went back to watch a bunch of old games in the 80s out of interest in the Celtics/Lakers/Pistons era, and I was impressed:

People do rank rings highly, and people sometimes forget the Detroit roster depth fit around him well. They also attribute a lot of the team's success to his leadership. That said, his overall profile is of an elite two-way slashing point guard who stepped up under the spotlight, who scored because he had to, but was an elite playmaker, scrappy defender, and effective team leader.

For me watching, I would say stats don't tell the full story in multiple ways. For basic stats, we can use steals, assists, and shooting efficiency as good examples. On paper they are just numbers... but:

- Steals can be overrated because of people gambling and screwing up their coverages. But a lot of IT's steals were just straight up on-ball rips or successful swipes/ball pokes, not diving for risky interceptions or trying to sneak up on someone. And he was generally pesky on the ball, played hard in the playoffs, and made the right rotations.

- Assists can sometimes be inflated, the "Rondo assist" or Stockton getting something from a Karl Malone post-up and all that. But most of IT's assists were from good playmaking (like slashing and drawing in defense then dropping it to someone in the dunker spot), pick and pop (with Laimbeer for example), and showing great court vision with difficult passes (occasional fast outlets, bullet pass between defenders to cutters). There was nobody he could just dump the ball to and let them work. Some might argue the Pistons should have done that more through Dantley in 88, but choosing a more dynamic offense vs iso ball is a topic for another day. Dumars was a better shooter for sure but didn't really have as much speed or handles to create his own shot, even if he could do it decently at times.

- IT's shooting efficiency was quite low, but there's a difference between a chucker who ignores open teammates vs someone who will force a bad shot when there aren't clear better options available (and sometimes makes difficult ones anyway). IT was very much more in the latter category, so that's why a lot of fans who watched him give him a pass for his shooting. It's not too unlike the discourse surrounding Kobe and why a lot of players still give him so much respect despite his more questionable efficiency numbers. Kobe was a better scorer and worse (though underrated) passer/playmaker than IT who did actually chuck at times, but I think you get the idea.

This sounds like I'm saying his playoffs steals/assists were worth more than the average league steal/assist, and his mediocre TS% is more excusable than typical mediocre TS% players. And, well, that's exactly what I'm saying :lol:. It's what I saw in his playoff games, and is probably why a lot of older fans who watch it are so quick to dismiss the stat arguments.

In addition:

- Steps up in the playoffs, which the stats also show, and people respect that. I really think the "playoff Jimmy" analogy is apt for recent fans. It would be better if these "playoff risers" played at their best all season like some of the ATGs, but being a playoff riser is still better than being a regular season player.

- Pretty sure he had the actual best handles for that era. Not saying this should necessarily weigh highly, but it definitely contributes to his image.

- He didn't truly beat Magic Lakers/Bird Celtics/MJ Bulls at their absolute peaks, but he did beat all of them when they were still deep playoff-level/contending teams in the late 80s. This analogy isn't perfect, but if someone beat 2016 OKC + GSW in the west and then beat 2016 Cavs in the finals as the #1 offensive player on the team, they would have a special aura too.

- He could impact the game even on bad shooting nights with hustle and IQ, and in this sense he is a clear cut above someone like Harden. Fans love hustle. People talk about some of his crazy scoring showings, but an underrated example is Detroit vs Washington game 5 in the 1988 playoffs. He shot 7/15 from 2 and 0/1 from 3 (2/2 FTs), but had 5 great steals (4 on-ball, 1 from a double) and 11 assists (1 turnover). One of my favorites from this game is watching him swipe the ball away from someone in front of him 1 on 1 on the fast break, and within like half a second he just outlet passes it to the other side of the court while falling out of bounds for an easy layup.

This might not convince you or everyone but hopefully it gives some perspective. He was an all-time two-way point guard, but with an extra edge when it mattered in the postseason that others on the list haven't typically shown.

Re: 4th greatest point guard

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:15 am
by JN61
Curry.

The list is Magic, Big O, West.