dmutombo321 wrote:You've gotta believe they're having some degree of buyers remorse, even this early.
I think that is extremely unlikely.
Given the cap implications I'm happy with the move. I still think he's a great fit.
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

dmutombo321 wrote:You've gotta believe they're having some degree of buyers remorse, even this early.

dmutombo321 wrote:yosemiteben wrote:I'm a little surprised people are even talking about trading Miles. That's obviously not going to happen.
No other team is dumb enough to take on his dead weight.
CatgutStitches wrote:chellis wrote:nickforthreee wrote:Lamb for Lou Will is floating around twitter...
As long as there is no 1st attached with Lamb, then sure.
This. I dont hate Lamb but Lou definitely fits what the team needs a lot better. IF this is in the works looks like we definitely arent tanking the year (Not that I thought we were)
Eoghan wrote:CatgutStitches wrote:chellis wrote:
As long as there is no 1st attached with Lamb, then sure.
This. I dont hate Lamb but Lou definitely fits what the team needs a lot better. IF this is in the works looks like we definitely arent tanking the year (Not that I thought we were)
What about our '17 1st and Ramon for Lou Will? Supposedly LAL wants to free up minutes for their young guards to develop and an injured Ramon on a team friendly deal would definitely do that.
Mystical Apples wrote:One time I purchased real estate and the interior needed painting. What a disaster!

dmutombo321 wrote:Plumblee costing 12.5 million a year through 2020 when we could have just waited and signed any number of journeymen bigs in the offseason who could have provided similarly modest output in limited minutes off the bench for considerably less money is what made the trade boneheaded.
Braggins wrote:Ramon and two 2nds is the most I'd give for Lou Williams. Lou/Beli/Frank trio seems like it would be a trainwreck on D and the boards. Lamb would fit nicely as the other wing with that group. Lou/Beli/Lamb/Frank/Plumlee might actually be a legit 2nd unit. Two iso scorers, two shooters/playmakers, and a rim runner. Swap out Lamb for Graham and all of a sudden that unit looks pretty meh again.
I doubt anyone is giving up a 1st round pick for Lou Williams and LA is tanking regardless, so two 2nds and expiring salary should do it. That would be a classic Cho trade I could get behind if we insist on not tanking. Basically the same as the Courtney Lee deal.
dmutombo321 wrote:Mystical Apples wrote:One time I purchased real estate and the interior needed painting. What a disaster!
A more apt real estate analogy would be foolishly overpaying for a house no other buyer will touch by double the market value and then finding out after the fact that the interior also needs work.
dmutombo321 wrote:Braggins wrote:Ramon and two 2nds is the most I'd give for Lou Williams. Lou/Beli/Frank trio seems like it would be a trainwreck on D and the boards. Lamb would fit nicely as the other wing with that group. Lou/Beli/Lamb/Frank/Plumlee might actually be a legit 2nd unit. Two iso scorers, two shooters/playmakers, and a rim runner. Swap out Lamb for Graham and all of a sudden that unit looks pretty meh again.
I doubt anyone is giving up a 1st round pick for Lou Williams and LA is tanking regardless, so two 2nds and expiring salary should do it. That would be a classic Cho trade I could get behind if we insist on not tanking. Basically the same as the Courtney Lee deal.
I really like Lou Williams' game. And if we were sitting as a 4 or 5 seed in the east right now and felt Williams could push us over the top to secure home court and assure we advance a round, I'd be all for dealing for him.
But giving up assets for him now is a waste IMO, even if its two seconds. In all likelihood, he just adds meaningless wins that hurt our lottery standing. At best (and I think this is unlikely), Detroit, Milwaukee and Miami all falter and we recapture the 7th of 8th seed. Even then we get dispatched in round one and then have only worse draft position to show for our trouble while also being out two second rounders
Mystical Apples wrote:Hawes and Hibbert aren't even playing for MIL. For all we know the market for Hawes was an attached 2nd. That + $$$ MIL kicked in makes Charlotte's return anywhere between:
Plumlee + cash
Plumlee + cash + whatever opportunity cost for Hawes
Meaning up to Plumlee + (2) 2nds
Not to mention the higher non-taxpayer MLE which can be applied elsewhere. And CHA's salary commitment to the C position next season of just +/- $28M.
yosemiteben wrote:dmutombo321 wrote:Plumblee costing 12.5 million a year through 2020 when we could have just waited and signed any number of journeymen bigs in the offseason who could have provided similarly modest output in limited minutes off the bench for considerably less money is what made the trade boneheaded.
You're making some pretty big assumptions about his fit while simultaneously overstating the cost and quality of FA C's next summer. Have you looked at the list of UFA centers next summer? There is literally zero mobile PNR oriented bigs.
Mystical Apples wrote:CHA's salary commitment to the C position next season of just +/- $28M.