ImageImageImageImageImage

Political Roundtable Part XII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,036
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#941 » by nate33 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 9:57 pm

gtn130 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
gtn130 wrote:So where are all the #Benghazi nutjobs ready and eager to scream about the Trump-approved raid that needlessly resulted in the death of a Navy SEAL, innocent civilians, and an eight-year-old American girl, and was otherwise widely considered an abject failure and complete disaster of a mission?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/thousands-in-yemen-protest-deadly-airstrike-as-saudi-coalition-agrees-to-a-probe/2016/10/09/cadf356a-8e3a-11e6-bc00-1a9756d4111b_story.html?utm_term=.2a6925661337

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/22/us-airstrike-yemen-dozens-dead-al-qaida-terrorism-training-camp


Yes, those things are also bad. Don't recall the #Benghazi folks raging over those atrocities either.

I bet we can find 100s of posts from my man popper (and probably Induveca) decrying the crime against humanity that was #Benghazi, but complete apathy toward pretty much everything else related to casualties overseas.

The whole Yemen situation is really bad. We've done some bad things ourselves, and we'd definitely looked the other way while Saudi Arabia did some really, really bad stuff using weapons provided by us.
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#942 » by sfam » Thu Feb 2, 2017 9:57 pm

nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:
sfam wrote:Bottom line, among most Muslims and many brown skinned foreigners, since the election, white men have now become the "other". This didn't use to be the case, but clearly is now. Apparently we look pretty scary. This has the chance of becoming a real driver of instability. Self-fulfilling prophecies will follow.



Ever been to Sweden? If you ever go there be sure to ask the women how they feel about Muslim immigration. You might get a different side of the story.

Tontoz is right.

The false premise is that if we continue to allow unrestrained immigration, all the new immigrants will be so happy that they will live in harmony with the white people already here. It sounds like a wonderful idea and I'm sure most of you fervently believe that this can happen. Unfortunately, it has never been the case anywhere in history. Ask Europeans how nice the new immigrants are in return despite Europe being so nice to admit them. There's mass rape, terrorism, and no-go zones there. There is no reason to think that won't happen here once the Muslim percentage of the population exceeds 5% or so. Indeed, it's probably going to happen here with Latino immigration as there will eventually be conflicts in southern California, New Mexico and Arizona.


We have nothing of the sort, never have. This is a strawman argument.

nate33 wrote:The unpleasant fact is, multiculturalism doesn't work. It hasn't worked anywhere in history. Multicultural societies that lack a dominant majority descend in balkanization, low public trust, high crime, and eventually civil war and/or secession every single time. What ALWAYS happens is that, as the dominant culture loses electoral power, it has no choice but to transition to identity politics in self defense to combat the identity politics understandably employed by minority groups. Once both sides resort to identity politics, government becomes paralyzed and ineffective.

Perhaps you should visit the United States. Its this place they call the melting pot. Its worked rather wonderfully over 200 years. Some even refer to this as the greatest country on earth BECAUSE of its multicultural nature.

nate33 wrote:We have two choices. We can continue with the same mass immigration we've sustained for the past 50 years, which will force whites into identity politics and ultimately lead to civil war/secession. Or we can put a stop to immigration and try and digest the 60 million new Americans we've invited over the past 50 years into one common polity. It took about 40 years of no immigration to digest the wave of immigration between 1880 and 1920, and most of those immigrants were English speaking and could pass for white themselves. It will probably take even longer this time around as the new Americans don't look like the old ones and have a more dramatically different language and culture.

This is a false narrative and false choice. As is your description of the history of different peoples interacting, and god forbid, even living together! We no longer ban interracial marriages and that's a good thing. In fact the trend for intercultural marriages is growing - this too is a good thing. The more interactions people have growing up with those different from them, the more tolerant they become. This too is good. As is the fact that over half of silicon valley CEOs we born in another country.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,036
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#943 » by nate33 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:01 pm

badinage wrote:Just trolling, exactly. No big deal. I mean, what's the fuss, guys? It's just the Holocaust, fer Chrissakes.

How about me and my boys go round up some of these innocent kids and take them for a little ol' camp experience for a couple weeks -- old-school camp; a camp like they've never experienced before. They can wear cool baggy striped clothes, and get their heads shaved, and have their teeth pulled, and watch all manner of depravity and barbarity committed before their very eyes, and learn to understand, first-hand, terror and fear and what it's like to be an outsider in a culture. Awesome, right! A real teachable moment. And at night, for fun, we can flog the **** out of them, and make them cry and beg for mercy, and laugh in their faces.

See boys? As Mr. Faulkner said, the past isn't dead, it isn't even passed.

I'm just saying perspectives are different. To people born during or immediately after the war, the Holocaust is very personal because they knew people who experienced it first hand. But as things fade into history, it loses resolution. Nobody is saying that the Holocaust wasn't horrific. I'm just saying that to somebody born in 1999, it's ancient history indistinguishable from the atrocities committed by, say, Genghis Kahn. It's just not going to be as taboo as it is to someone born in 1960.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#944 » by DCZards » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:13 pm

nate33 wrote:
badinage wrote:Just trolling, exactly. No big deal. I mean, what's the fuss, guys? It's just the Holocaust, fer Chrissakes.

How about me and my boys go round up some of these innocent kids and take them for a little ol' camp experience for a couple weeks -- old-school camp; a camp like they've never experienced before. They can wear cool baggy striped clothes, and get their heads shaved, and have their teeth pulled, and watch all manner of depravity and barbarity committed before their very eyes, and learn to understand, first-hand, terror and fear and what it's like to be an outsider in a culture. Awesome, right! A real teachable moment. And at night, for fun, we can flog the **** out of them, and make them cry and beg for mercy, and laugh in their faces.

See boys? As Mr. Faulkner said, the past isn't dead, it isn't even passed.

I'm just saying perspectives are different. To people born during or immediately after the war, the Holocaust is very personal because they knew people who experienced it first hand. But as things fade into history, it loses resolution. Nobody is saying that the Holocaust wasn't horrific. I'm just saying that to somebody born in 1999, it's ancient history indistinguishable from the atrocities committed by, say, Genghis Kahn. It's just not going to be as taboo as it is to someone born in 1960.


Well, if our young people are not learning about the atrocities of the Holocaust we damn sure better teach them. Because as has been said, "those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it."
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#945 » by sfam » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:14 pm

State Department Joke:
Question: How do you know who the outgoing one is at the State Department?
Answer: He's the one staring at the other guy's shoes!


You cannot find a more conservative Department than the State Department in terms of people not getting out in front of a story or sticking their neck out. The in-person part of the Foreign Service Officer test literally weeds them out. The reason is clear - nobody wants a random diplomat at post making policy on their own without checking with Washington.

1000 signing a dissent letter is enormous. Considering over half of the 60,000 working at State are foreign service nationals, and the majority of the rest are administrative or specialists. There are actually just over 6,000 commissioned foreign service officers or diplomats - these are the folks the State Department is designed for similar to military officers at Defense. That over 1000 of them would sign such a dissent letter is sort of earth shaking there.

BTW, its simply not possible to remove that number of FSOs without significant loss of capability.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,036
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#946 » by nate33 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:18 pm

sfam wrote:Perhaps you should visit the United States. Its this place they call the melting pot. Its worked rather wonderfully over 200 years. Some even refer to this as the greatest country on earth BECAUSE of its multicultural nature.


The country has not been a melting pot for 200 years. It was virtually exclusively northern European Protestants from 1600 until 1880 (with the obvious exception of slaves). From 1880-1920 we added some Catholic southern Europeans and Eastern Europeans and some Jews. So it's fair to say that 1900 or so was the start of the multiculturalism experiment. The experiment stopped again in 1920 because the cultural pressure became to great. Cities were paralyzed by ethnic nepotism, gangs, and ethnic mobs. We had two depressions and two World Wars in the meantime to help consolidate a national identity so that we were able to restart the multicultural experiment again in 1965. By 1996 or so, the balkanization reached a near critical point. Since then, government has been nearly paralyzed. There are no conservative Democrats, no liberal Republicans, and nothing can get done without supermajorities. We have state flouting federal law on issues like sanctuary cities. We've also had stagnant median wages since the 1970's. I don't think there's a ton of evidence that multiculturalism has been such an improvement for society.
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,159
And1: 5,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#947 » by DCZards » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:20 pm

sfam wrote:This is a false narrative and false choice. As is your description of the history of different peoples interacting, and god forbid, even living together! We no longer ban interracial marriages and that's a good thing. In fact the trend for intercultural marriages is growing - this too is a good thing. The more interactions people have growing up with those different from them, the more tolerant they become. This too is good. As is the fact that over half of silicon valley CEOs we born in another country.


I'm betting that most millennials (and others) have a far different view of the value, importance and beauty of multiculturalism than that expressed by Nate.
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#948 » by montestewart » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:24 pm

nate33 wrote:
badinage wrote:Just trolling, exactly. No big deal. I mean, what's the fuss, guys? It's just the Holocaust, fer Chrissakes.

How about me and my boys go round up some of these innocent kids and take them for a little ol' camp experience for a couple weeks -- old-school camp; a camp like they've never experienced before. They can wear cool baggy striped clothes, and get their heads shaved, and have their teeth pulled, and watch all manner of depravity and barbarity committed before their very eyes, and learn to understand, first-hand, terror and fear and what it's like to be an outsider in a culture. Awesome, right! A real teachable moment. And at night, for fun, we can flog the **** out of them, and make them cry and beg for mercy, and laugh in their faces.

See boys? As Mr. Faulkner said, the past isn't dead, it isn't even passed.

I'm just saying perspectives are different. To people born during or immediately after the war, the Holocaust is very personal because they knew people who experienced it first hand. But as things fade into history, it loses resolution. Nobody is saying that the Holocaust wasn't horrific. I'm just saying that to somebody born in 1999, it's ancient history indistinguishable from the atrocities committed by, say, Genghis Kahn. It's just not going to be as taboo as it is to someone born in 1960.

A useful dividing line regarding "contemporary history" is whether there are significant numbers of people still living who experienced events. So, when I was growing up, World War I, yes, Civil War, probably not (maybe a few born during the war and barely able to remember anything). There are about 9 million people age 80 or older in the US, and many more elsewhere in the world, so there are plenty still living who experienced WW II and have clear memories of the events. There are only a very few who lived in the time of Genghis Khan, and their memories are more suspect.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,612
And1: 8,844
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#949 » by AFM » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:29 pm

Interracial marriages, what's next? Are we going to let Monte marry his dog?
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,827
And1: 7,961
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#950 » by montestewart » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:33 pm

AFM wrote:Interracial marriages, what's next? Are we going to let Monte marry his dog?

That would be big of me
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#951 » by sfam » Thu Feb 2, 2017 10:35 pm

nate33 wrote:
sfam wrote:Perhaps you should visit the United States. Its this place they call the melting pot. Its worked rather wonderfully over 200 years. Some even refer to this as the greatest country on earth BECAUSE of its multicultural nature.


The country has not been a melting pot for 200 years. It was virtually exclusively northern European Protestants from 1600 until 1880 (with the obvious exception of slaves). From 1880-1920 we added some Catholic southern Europeans and Eastern Europeans and some Jews. So it's fair to say that 1900 or so was the start of the multiculturalism experiment. The experiment stopped again in 1920 because the cultural pressure became to great. Cities were paralyzed by ethnic nepotism, gangs, and ethnic mobs. We had two depressions and two World Wars in the meantime to help consolidate a national identity so that we were able to restart the multicultural experiment again in 1965. By 1996 or so, the balkanization reached a near critical point. Since then, government has been nearly paralyzed. There are no conservative Democrats, no liberal Republicans, and nothing can get done without supermajorities. We have state flouting federal law on issues like sanctuary cities. We've also had stagnant median wages since the 1970's. I don't think there's a ton of evidence that multiculturalism has been such an improvement for society.


Well, you could look at economic growth- visit silicon valley for instance. The entire planet comes there to study it in hopes of duplicating the innovation ecosystem. And I honestly can't remember that horrific nightmarish situation of 1996 you speak of, but whatever. That's just a pretty strange view of history. Crime was certainly on the rise, but its more likely the removal of leaded gas has done more than anything on the immigration side for solving the crime wave, which has dropped through the floor since than, and still.

For me, the evidence of its success is nearly everywhere. The homogeneous society ship has sailed long ago, like before the Constitution was signed. We have been heterogeneous since the beginning. The fact we no longer see Irish or Polish as lessor people is a good thing. That we now have new targets of hate is not a good thing.

I've been to over 20 developing countries across the globe. I know what fragile governance and inter-ethnic and inter-religious tensions look like. Myanmar, the "new democracy" has had 16 armed conflicts taking place in the country for years - still does! The US is nothing like that. The demonstrations we see point to just the opposite - just like the tea party movement, civic engagement is strong in the US.

The problem with government paralysis isn't all those rotten brown people and women wearing scarves invading our Walmart shopping experience. The problem is structural in nature - gerrymandering removes the need for representative democracy, for instance. The electoral college means republicans living in California or New York, and Democrats living in Texas or Wyoming''s vote really doesn't matter. Fix these problems and the paralysis goes away, even if women are still wearing head scarves.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,036
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#952 » by nate33 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:15 pm

Image
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,036
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#953 » by nate33 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:19 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#954 » by sfam » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:22 pm

nate33 wrote:
Read on Twitter

For clarity's sake, there's never a time I advocate violence. Nonviolent civil resistance, definitely. Violence, never.

In fact if you just look at the data, for those civil resistance movements advocating regime change, you are twice as likely to succeed nonviolently as violently. This trend has been increasing the past 4 decades.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,568
And1: 23,036
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#955 » by nate33 » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:22 pm

Read on Twitter
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,612
And1: 8,844
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#956 » by AFM » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:24 pm

sfam wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Read on Twitter

For clarity's sake, there's never a time I advocate violence. Nonviolent civil resistance, definitely. Violence, never.

In fact if you just look at the data, for those civil resistance movements advocating regime change, you are twice as likely to succeed nonviolently as violently. This trend has been increasing the past 4 decades.


Agreed. Live and let live. And for those that disagree, kill 'em.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,612
And1: 8,844
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#957 » by AFM » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:25 pm

nate33 wrote:
Read on Twitter


I couldn't fall asleep last night, I was up late following this.
She's a cutie too. Wish I could find me a fine ass bitty like that in DC.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,678
And1: 5,263
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#958 » by tontoz » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:36 pm

Sweden: Muslim migrants gang-rape woman, broadcast it live on Facebook
JANUARY 23, 2017 7:36 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER 87 COMMENTS

The Swedish publication NyheterIdag says that the attackers were “nysvenskar,” that is, “new Swedes,” which is the establishment media euphemism for Muslim migrants.

And so here we go again. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.



“Horror as gang rapes woman in Sweden and broadcasts it on FACEBOOK LIVE,” by Siobhan McFadyen, Express, January 23, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A WOMAN was gang raped in Sweden by a group of men who broadcast the horrific attack on Facebook live, it has been claimed.

Disgusted witnesses who saw the footage said the men only stopped their horrendous attack when police stormed the flat and stopped the broadcast.


https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/sweden-muslim-migrants-gang-rape-woman-broadcast-it-live-on-facebook

Sweden bent over backwards to bo accommodating to Muslims and what do they have to show for it? A rape epidemic.

It isn't an issue of multiculturism. It is an issue of crazy af Muslims. I don't know if Islam attacts crazy people or encourages them to act crazy, but it doesn't really matter. I just know i want their immigration restricted. I don't give a rat's ass if it offends any of them. Obviously not all Muslims are nuts but they certainly seem to have a disproportionate number of them.

I don't see other religions issuing a religious order than women can't ride bikes, can't go to school, can't show any part of their body in public or go out in public at all without a male escort. I don't see guys from other religions organizing systematic gang rapes of underage girls. It is only crazy af Muslims doing that.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
sfam
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,462
And1: 548
Joined: Aug 03, 2007
         

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#959 » by sfam » Thu Feb 2, 2017 11:49 pm

tontoz wrote:
Sweden: Muslim migrants gang-rape woman, broadcast it live on Facebook
JANUARY 23, 2017 7:36 AM BY ROBERT SPENCER 87 COMMENTS

The Swedish publication NyheterIdag says that the attackers were “nysvenskar,” that is, “new Swedes,” which is the establishment media euphemism for Muslim migrants.

And so here we go again. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.



“Horror as gang rapes woman in Sweden and broadcasts it on FACEBOOK LIVE,” by Siobhan McFadyen, Express, January 23, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

A WOMAN was gang raped in Sweden by a group of men who broadcast the horrific attack on Facebook live, it has been claimed.

Disgusted witnesses who saw the footage said the men only stopped their horrendous attack when police stormed the flat and stopped the broadcast.


https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/sweden-muslim-migrants-gang-rape-woman-broadcast-it-live-on-facebook

Sweden bent over backwards to bo accommodating to Muslims and what do they have to show for it? A rape epidemic.

It isn't an issue of multiculturism. It is an issue of crazy af Muslims. I don't know if Islam attacts crazy people or encourages them to act crazy, but it doesn't really matter. I just know i want their immigration restricted. I don't give a rat's ass if it offends any of them. Obviously not all Muslims are nuts but they certainly seem to have a disproportionate number of them.

I don't see other religions issuing a religious order than women can't ride bikes, can't go to school, can't show any part of their body in public or go out in public at all without a male escort. It is only crazy af Muslims doing that.


I guess its all the source you choose:

Granted the Globe and Mail doesn't have the stature of Jihadi watch - clearly the gold standard for journalism:
In a sense. Statistics show that the foreign-born in Sweden, as in most European countries, do have a higher rate of criminal charges than the native-born, in everything from shoplifting to murder (though not enough to affect the crime rate by more than a tiny margin). The opposite is true in North America, where immigrants have lower-than-average crime rates.

Why the difference? Because people who go to Sweden are poorer, and crime rates are mostly a product not of ethnicity but of class. In a 2013 analysis of 63,000 Swedish residents, Prof. Sarnecki and his colleagues found that 75 per cent of the difference in foreign-born crime is accounted for by income and neighbourhood, both indicators of poverty. Among the Swedish-born children of immigrants, the crime rate falls in half (and is almost entirely concentrated in lesser property crimes) and is 100-per-cent attributable to class – they are no more likely to commit crimes, including rape, than ethnic Swedes of the same family income.


Bottom line, Europe has a horrific set of problems right now, which are different from our issues in the US. But just like here, there is lots of hype and scary looking scarves there as well. Fear drives perception - this is different from actual truth in what is occurring. Yes, there are horrific things refugees and migrants have done - this is clearly different from a blanket statement that everyone who believes in a certain religion are most likely raping terrorists. In fact, the vast vast majority are anything but. And the policies in place now prevent those from getting through, at least from the Refugee process.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,678
And1: 5,263
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Political Roundtable Part XII 

Post#960 » by tontoz » Fri Feb 3, 2017 12:19 am

Nonsense. I am pretty sure they had poor people in Sweden before they were hit with a wave of Muslim migrants, but they didn't have a rape problem until recently.

But as the government has welcomed tens of thousands of Muslim migrants to be resettled in the Scandinavian country, some are wondering if Swedes may soon have to revert back to separate swimming arrangements.

The reason is simple, reports Swedish journalist Ingrid Carlqvist, a fellow at the Gatestone Institute.

Women are faced with a new reality when they show up for a swim at any number of public pools.

“Young male asylum seekers have turned Sweden’s public swimming pools into ordeals of rape and sexual assault,” Carlqvist writes. “More and more Swedes are now avoiding the pools all together.”

Swedish politicians seem convinced that some education on ‘equality’ will change the ways of men, who, since childhood, have been taught that it is the responsibility of women not to arouse them – and therefore the woman’s fault if the man feels like raping her,” observed Carlqvist in her latest article.

In 1975, before Sweden began experimenting with a multicultural immigration strategy, it was one of the safest countries in the world.

Sweden and Denmark now have the highest rates of sexual assault in the European Union, according to a study by the European Agency for Fundamental Rights. The findings were based on data from 2012 that was published in 2014



Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/swedish-rape-crisis-boils-over-as-media-stays-silent/#Fept6tWe4zKT2tFM.99



http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/swedish-rape-crisis-boils-over-as-media-stays-silent/

It isn't just an issue in Sweden. Abuse of women by Muslims is routine all across Europe. Even here many Muslim women cover themselves from head to toe in public and it isnt because they are poor.

“It should come as surprise to no one that men from the Middle East and North Africa have quite a different view of women than Swedish men do. The only mystery is why Swedish politicians have got it in their heads that everyone who sets foot on Swedish soil will immediately embrace our values, our view of women and our traditions.”

Bikini-clad women seen as inviting sex

The largest ethnic groups coming to Sweden are Afghan, Iraqi, Somali and Syrian – the same groups that are now coming to the U.S. as refugees, although in smaller numbers as a percentage of total population.

She said Swedish politicians may be surprised to learn that many of these foreign men think women who run around in bikinis are fair game, but they cannot admit that the difference has anything to do with being raised under Islam.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/swedish-rape-crisis-boils-over-as-media-stays-silent/#Fept6tWe4zKT2tFM.99
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD

Return to Washington Wizards